Subacute Stent Deformities as an Underlying Reason for Vessel Stenosis after Flow Diversion with the p64 Stent: Review and Discussion of Biologic Mechanisms and Consequences.

G Vladev, A Sirakov, S Matanov, K Sirakova, K Ninov, S Sirakov
{"title":"Subacute Stent Deformities as an Underlying Reason for Vessel Stenosis after Flow Diversion with the p64 Stent: Review and Discussion of Biologic Mechanisms and Consequences.","authors":"G Vladev, A Sirakov, S Matanov, K Sirakova, K Ninov, S Sirakov","doi":"10.3174/ajnr.A8564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Flow-diverter stents are a potent and efficient tool in the instrumentarium of neurointerventional radiologists for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. With their implementation, some adverse effects and complications such as hemorrhagic and ischemic ones, have been seen as a potential downfall of the method. In-stent stenosis is one such complication, which until now has not received enormous attention due to its seemingly benign characteristic. In our study we propose a different point of view on this matter and aim to establish a potential mechanism for its development: a subacute postprocedural stent deformation, due to segmental vessel constriction as a reaction to the implant.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We enrolled 48 patients between the ages of 31 and 71 (8 men) with aneurysms on the distal portions of the ICA, all of whom were treated with the p64 flow-diverter stent, to assess the incidence of this phenomenon, as well as establish a correlation between it and subsequent clinical symptoms. A protocol for short-term follow-up, consisting only of a high-dose fluoroscopy image of the implant (conducted on the 14th postprocedural day) was implemented to assess the state of the implant before endothelization was to be expected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stent deformities were seen in 58% of cases. One patient with an observed stent deformity presented with several episodes of acute contralateral 1-sided weakness of the limbs. Seventy-one percent of those patients presented with a mild/moderate unilateral headache postprocedurally. A correlation between the deformity and a subsequent narrowing of the parent vessel diameter was established on follow-ups. Notable in-stent stenosis was reported in 35% of all cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cases with subacute stent deformities are presented in a nonnegligible percent of flow-diversion therapies with the p64 stent. A statistically significant association between the observed deformation and subsequent in-stent stenosis was observed on follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":93863,"journal":{"name":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"712-719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Flow-diverter stents are a potent and efficient tool in the instrumentarium of neurointerventional radiologists for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. With their implementation, some adverse effects and complications such as hemorrhagic and ischemic ones, have been seen as a potential downfall of the method. In-stent stenosis is one such complication, which until now has not received enormous attention due to its seemingly benign characteristic. In our study we propose a different point of view on this matter and aim to establish a potential mechanism for its development: a subacute postprocedural stent deformation, due to segmental vessel constriction as a reaction to the implant.

Materials and methods: We enrolled 48 patients between the ages of 31 and 71 (8 men) with aneurysms on the distal portions of the ICA, all of whom were treated with the p64 flow-diverter stent, to assess the incidence of this phenomenon, as well as establish a correlation between it and subsequent clinical symptoms. A protocol for short-term follow-up, consisting only of a high-dose fluoroscopy image of the implant (conducted on the 14th postprocedural day) was implemented to assess the state of the implant before endothelization was to be expected.

Results: Stent deformities were seen in 58% of cases. One patient with an observed stent deformity presented with several episodes of acute contralateral 1-sided weakness of the limbs. Seventy-one percent of those patients presented with a mild/moderate unilateral headache postprocedurally. A correlation between the deformity and a subsequent narrowing of the parent vessel diameter was established on follow-ups. Notable in-stent stenosis was reported in 35% of all cases.

Conclusions: Cases with subacute stent deformities are presented in a nonnegligible percent of flow-diversion therapies with the p64 stent. A statistically significant association between the observed deformation and subsequent in-stent stenosis was observed on follow-up.

背景和目的:血流分流支架是神经介入放射科医生治疗颅内动脉瘤的有效工具。在使用过程中,一些不良反应和并发症,如出血性和缺血性并发症,被认为是该方法的潜在缺陷。支架内狭窄就是这样一种并发症,由于其看似良性的特点,迄今为止尚未引起人们的高度重视。在我们的研究中,我们对这一问题提出了不同的观点,并旨在确定其发生的潜在机制:亚急性术后支架变形,这是由于节段性血管收缩对植入物的反应:我们招募了 48 名年龄在 31 岁至 71 岁之间、患有主动脉远端动脉瘤的患者(8 名男性),所有患者均接受了 p64 分流支架治疗,以评估这种现象的发生率,并确定其与后续临床症状之间的相关性。此外,还实施了一项短期随访方案,仅对植入物进行高剂量透视成像(在术后第14天进行),以评估植入物在预计发生内皮化之前的状态:58%的病例出现支架变形。一名出现支架畸形的患者数次出现急性对侧单侧肢体无力。71%的患者在术后出现轻度/中度单侧头痛。随访结果表明,畸形与随后母血管直径变窄之间存在相关性。所有病例中有35%出现明显的支架内狭窄:结论:使用p64支架进行血流分流治疗的病例中,有相当一部分会出现支架亚急性变形。随访发现,观察到的变形与随后的支架内狭窄之间存在统计学意义上的重大关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信