How resource abundance and resource stochasticity affect organisms' range sizes.

IF 3.4 1区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Stefano Mezzini, Christen H Fleming, E Patrícia Medici, Michael J Noonan
{"title":"How resource abundance and resource stochasticity affect organisms' range sizes.","authors":"Stefano Mezzini, Christen H Fleming, E Patrícia Medici, Michael J Noonan","doi":"10.1186/s40462-025-00546-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>From megafauna to amoebas, the amount of space heterotrophic organisms use is thought to be tightly linked to the availability of resources within their habitats, such that organisms living in productive habitats generally require less space than those in resource-poor habitats. This hypothesis has widespread empirical support, but existing studies have focused primarily on responses to spatiotemporal changes in mean resources, while responses to unpredictable changes in resources (i.e., variance in resources or resource stochasticity) are still largely unknown. Since organisms adjust to variable environmental conditions, failing to consider the effects of resource unpredictability can result in an insufficient understanding of an organism's range size.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leverage the available literature to provide a unifying framework and hypothesis for the effects of resource abundance and stochasticity on organisms' range sizes. We then use simulated movement data to demonstrate how the combined effects of resource abundance and stochasticity interact to shape predictable patterns in range size. Finally, we test the hypothesis using real-world tracking data on a lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) from the Brazilian Cerrado.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Organisms' range sizes decrease nonlinearly with resource abundance and increase nonlinearly with resource stochasticity, and the effects of resource stochasticity depend strongly on resource abundance. Additionally, the distribution and predictability of resources can exacerbate the effects of other drivers of movement, such as resource depletion, competition, and predation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Accounting for resource abundance and stochasticity is crucial for understanding the movement behavior of free-ranging organisms. Failing to account for resource stochasticity can lead to an incomplete and incorrect understanding of how and why organisms move, particularly during periods of rapid change.</p>","PeriodicalId":54288,"journal":{"name":"Movement Ecology","volume":"13 1","pages":"20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-025-00546-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: From megafauna to amoebas, the amount of space heterotrophic organisms use is thought to be tightly linked to the availability of resources within their habitats, such that organisms living in productive habitats generally require less space than those in resource-poor habitats. This hypothesis has widespread empirical support, but existing studies have focused primarily on responses to spatiotemporal changes in mean resources, while responses to unpredictable changes in resources (i.e., variance in resources or resource stochasticity) are still largely unknown. Since organisms adjust to variable environmental conditions, failing to consider the effects of resource unpredictability can result in an insufficient understanding of an organism's range size.

Methods: We leverage the available literature to provide a unifying framework and hypothesis for the effects of resource abundance and stochasticity on organisms' range sizes. We then use simulated movement data to demonstrate how the combined effects of resource abundance and stochasticity interact to shape predictable patterns in range size. Finally, we test the hypothesis using real-world tracking data on a lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) from the Brazilian Cerrado.

Results: Organisms' range sizes decrease nonlinearly with resource abundance and increase nonlinearly with resource stochasticity, and the effects of resource stochasticity depend strongly on resource abundance. Additionally, the distribution and predictability of resources can exacerbate the effects of other drivers of movement, such as resource depletion, competition, and predation.

Conclusions: Accounting for resource abundance and stochasticity is crucial for understanding the movement behavior of free-ranging organisms. Failing to account for resource stochasticity can lead to an incomplete and incorrect understanding of how and why organisms move, particularly during periods of rapid change.

资源丰度和资源随机性如何影响生物的生存范围。
背景:从巨型动物到变形虫,异养生物使用的空间量被认为与其栖息地内资源的可用性密切相关,因此,生活在生产性栖息地的生物通常比生活在资源贫乏栖息地的生物需要更少的空间。这一假设得到了广泛的实证支持,但现有的研究主要集中在对平均资源时空变化的响应上,而对不可预测的资源变化(即资源方差或资源随机性)的响应在很大程度上仍然未知。由于生物体适应多变的环境条件,不考虑资源不可预测性的影响可能导致对生物体范围大小的理解不足。方法:利用现有文献,为资源丰度和随机性对生物范围大小的影响提供一个统一的框架和假设。然后,我们使用模拟运动数据来演示资源丰度和随机性的综合效应如何相互作用,以形成范围大小的可预测模式。最后,我们使用来自巴西塞拉多的低地貘(Tapirus terrestris)的真实跟踪数据来验证这一假设。结果:生物的活动范围随资源丰度呈非线性减小,随资源随机性呈非线性增大,且资源随机性的影响强烈依赖于资源丰度。此外,资源的分布和可预测性会加剧其他驱动因素的影响,如资源枯竭、竞争和捕食。结论:考虑资源丰度和随机性对理解自由放养生物的运动行为至关重要。不考虑资源的随机性可能导致对生物如何以及为什么移动的不完整和不正确的理解,特别是在快速变化期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement Ecology
Movement Ecology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
47
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Movement Ecology is an open-access interdisciplinary journal publishing novel insights from empirical and theoretical approaches into the ecology of movement of the whole organism - either animals, plants or microorganisms - as the central theme. We welcome manuscripts on any taxa and any movement phenomena (e.g. foraging, dispersal and seasonal migration) addressing important research questions on the patterns, mechanisms, causes and consequences of organismal movement. Manuscripts will be rigorously peer-reviewed to ensure novelty and high quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信