Guaranteed income and health in the U.S. and Canada: A scoping review.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Holly M Nishimura, Sevly Snguon, Marik Moen, Lorraine T Dean
{"title":"Guaranteed income and health in the U.S. and Canada: A scoping review.","authors":"Holly M Nishimura, Sevly Snguon, Marik Moen, Lorraine T Dean","doi":"10.1093/epirev/mxaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the economic impact of guaranteed income (recurring, unconditional, and unrestricted cash transfers intended to supplement the income of participants) is well-studied, much less is known about how guaranteed income may impact health, especially in the context of high-income countries like the U.S. and Canada. We searched five electronic databases for terms related to \"guaranteed income\" and \"cash transfer\" through April 23, 2022. Among 5,340 records originally identified, 25 met our inclusion criteria and represented 16 unique guaranteed income initiatives. Most included studies used a quantitative approach (n=22, 88%), were published between 2000-2022 (n=21, 84%), and were in the U.S. (n=15, 60%). Health outcomes included: maternal and child health (e.g., pre-term births, breastfeeding initiation), healthcare utilization (e.g., hospital admissions), mental health (e.g., depression), physical health (e.g., body mass index) and behavioral health (e.g., substance use). Maternal, infant, and child health were most highly represented health outcomes. Guaranteed income initiatives generally had significant positive impacts on health outcomes, with the largest impact seen among the most vulnerable recipients. There was a notable absence of data on neighborhood-level health outcomes, chronic and infectious diseases, potential unintended consequences, and long-term impacts of guaranteed income on health. While studies on the impact of guaranteed income and health studies are few, they suggest guaranteed income has the potential to positively impact many, but not all, health outcomes. Rigorous assessment of health outcomes is still needed, and additional health outcomes should be considered in the design and evaluation of guaranteed income initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":50510,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologic Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxaf003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the economic impact of guaranteed income (recurring, unconditional, and unrestricted cash transfers intended to supplement the income of participants) is well-studied, much less is known about how guaranteed income may impact health, especially in the context of high-income countries like the U.S. and Canada. We searched five electronic databases for terms related to "guaranteed income" and "cash transfer" through April 23, 2022. Among 5,340 records originally identified, 25 met our inclusion criteria and represented 16 unique guaranteed income initiatives. Most included studies used a quantitative approach (n=22, 88%), were published between 2000-2022 (n=21, 84%), and were in the U.S. (n=15, 60%). Health outcomes included: maternal and child health (e.g., pre-term births, breastfeeding initiation), healthcare utilization (e.g., hospital admissions), mental health (e.g., depression), physical health (e.g., body mass index) and behavioral health (e.g., substance use). Maternal, infant, and child health were most highly represented health outcomes. Guaranteed income initiatives generally had significant positive impacts on health outcomes, with the largest impact seen among the most vulnerable recipients. There was a notable absence of data on neighborhood-level health outcomes, chronic and infectious diseases, potential unintended consequences, and long-term impacts of guaranteed income on health. While studies on the impact of guaranteed income and health studies are few, they suggest guaranteed income has the potential to positively impact many, but not all, health outcomes. Rigorous assessment of health outcomes is still needed, and additional health outcomes should be considered in the design and evaluation of guaranteed income initiatives.

美国和加拿大的保障收入和健康:范围审查。
虽然保证收入(旨在补充参与者收入的经常性、无条件和不受限制的现金转移)的经济影响已经得到了充分的研究,但关于保证收入如何影响健康,特别是在美国和加拿大等高收入国家的背景下,所知甚少。我们在五个电子数据库中搜索了2022年4月23日之前与“保证收入”和“现金转移”相关的术语。在最初确定的5,340个记录中,有25个符合我们的纳入标准,代表了16个独特的保证收入计划。大多数纳入的研究采用定量方法(n= 22,88%),发表于2000-2022年之间(n= 21,84%),并且在美国(n= 15,60%)。健康结果包括:孕产妇和儿童健康(如早产、开始母乳喂养)、医疗保健利用(如住院)、精神健康(如抑郁症)、身体健康(如体重指数)和行为健康(如物质使用)。孕产妇、婴儿和儿童健康是最具代表性的健康结果。保障收入举措通常对健康结果产生重大的积极影响,对最脆弱的接受者的影响最大。值得注意的是,缺乏关于社区一级的健康结果、慢性和传染病、潜在的意外后果以及有保障的收入对健康的长期影响的数据。虽然关于保证收入和健康研究影响的研究很少,但它们表明,保证收入有可能对许多(但不是全部)健康结果产生积极影响。仍然需要严格评估健康结果,在设计和评估有保障收入举措时应考虑到其他健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epidemiologic Reviews
Epidemiologic Reviews 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Epidemiologic Reviews is a leading review journal in public health. Published once a year, issues collect review articles on a particular subject. Recent issues have focused on The Obesity Epidemic, Epidemiologic Research on Health Disparities, and Epidemiologic Approaches to Global Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信