Risk factors and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric intensive care.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Müge Seval, Emine Uzuntarla Güney, Tülay Kuzlu Ayyıldız, Nazife Şirin Kuzlu Alkan
{"title":"Risk factors and prevalence of medical device-related pressure injuries in pediatric intensive care.","authors":"Müge Seval, Emine Uzuntarla Güney, Tülay Kuzlu Ayyıldız, Nazife Şirin Kuzlu Alkan","doi":"10.1016/j.pedn.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the incidence of pressure injuries (PI) in patients connected to medical devices during their treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), the risk factors, and the most accurate scale that assesses PI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study adhering to STROBE guidelines. It was carried out with 70 children connected to medical devices during their treatment in the PICU between 12.01.2023 and 06.30.2024. The PI development risk statuses of the patients associated with medical devices were evaluated using the Braden Q Scale, the BUCH Scale, the Glamorgan Pediatric PI Risk Assessment Scale, and an Injury Monitoring Form.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDPI) in the PICU was 12.8 %. MDPI developed the most frequently in the nasal and oral regions, and 61.5 % of these injuries were Stage 1. The equipment with the highest rates of contribution to PI included nasogastric tubes, orogastric feeding equipment, and oral intubation tubes. The Braden Q, BUCH, and Glamorgan Scales had AUC values of 0.91, 0.83, and 0.80, sensitivity values of 77 %, 77 %, and 66 %, and specificity values of 82 %, 69 %, and 62 %, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study highlight that medical devices used to support the recovery of critically ill children in the PICU pose a significant risk for PI development.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>Determining incidence and risk factors is important to prevent PI. Appropriate protocols, interventions, and strategies can be developed to manage the identified MDPI risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":48899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Nursing-Nursing Care of Children & Families","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2025.03.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the incidence of pressure injuries (PI) in patients connected to medical devices during their treatment in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), the risk factors, and the most accurate scale that assesses PI.

Methods: A cross-sectional study adhering to STROBE guidelines. It was carried out with 70 children connected to medical devices during their treatment in the PICU between 12.01.2023 and 06.30.2024. The PI development risk statuses of the patients associated with medical devices were evaluated using the Braden Q Scale, the BUCH Scale, the Glamorgan Pediatric PI Risk Assessment Scale, and an Injury Monitoring Form.

Results: The incidence of medical device-related pressure injuries (MDPI) in the PICU was 12.8 %. MDPI developed the most frequently in the nasal and oral regions, and 61.5 % of these injuries were Stage 1. The equipment with the highest rates of contribution to PI included nasogastric tubes, orogastric feeding equipment, and oral intubation tubes. The Braden Q, BUCH, and Glamorgan Scales had AUC values of 0.91, 0.83, and 0.80, sensitivity values of 77 %, 77 %, and 66 %, and specificity values of 82 %, 69 %, and 62 %, respectively.

Conclusions: The results of this study highlight that medical devices used to support the recovery of critically ill children in the PICU pose a significant risk for PI development.

Implications for clinical practice: Determining incidence and risk factors is important to prevent PI. Appropriate protocols, interventions, and strategies can be developed to manage the identified MDPI risk factors.

儿科重症监护中与医疗器械相关的压力损伤的风险因素和发生率。
研究目的本研究旨在确定在儿科重症监护室(PICU)接受治疗期间,与医疗设备相连的患者压力损伤(PI)的发生率、风险因素以及评估 PI 的最准确量表:方法:根据 STROBE 指南进行横断面研究。研究对象为 2023 年 1 月 12 日至 2024 年 6 月 30 日在儿童重症监护室接受治疗期间连接了医疗设备的 70 名儿童。使用布莱登 Q 量表、BUCH 量表、格拉摩根儿科 PI 风险评估量表和损伤监测表评估了与医疗设备相关的患者的 PI 发展风险状况:结果:儿童重症监护病房中与医疗设备相关的压力损伤(MDPI)发生率为 12.8%。MDPI最常发生在鼻腔和口腔区域,61.5%的损伤为第一阶段。造成压力损伤率最高的设备包括鼻胃管、口胃喂养设备和口腔插管。Braden Q、BUCH 和格拉摩根量表的 AUC 值分别为 0.91、0.83 和 0.80,灵敏度值分别为 77 %、77 % 和 66 %,特异性值分别为 82 %、69 % 和 62 %:本研究结果表明,用于支持重症监护病房重症患儿康复的医疗设备极易引发 PI:对临床实践的启示:确定发病率和风险因素对预防 PI 非常重要。可以制定适当的方案、干预措施和策略来管理已确定的 MDPI 风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
291
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society (PENS) The Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of Children and Families (JPN) is interested in publishing evidence-based practice, quality improvement, theory, and research papers on a variety of topics from US and international authors. JPN is the official journal of the Society of Pediatric Nurses and the Pediatric Endocrinology Nursing Society. Cecily L. Betz, PhD, RN, FAAN is the Founder and Editor in Chief. Journal content covers the life span from birth to adolescence. Submissions should be pertinent to the nursing care needs of healthy and ill infants, children, and adolescents, addressing their biopsychosocial needs. JPN also features the following regular columns for which authors may submit brief papers: Hot Topics and Technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信