Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Tumors up to Two Centimeters in Diameter in Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 0.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z
Hussain Sohail Rangwala, Hareer Fatima, Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syed Irtiza Imam, Syed Raza Abbas, Qurat Ul Ain Qazi, Muhammad Osama Iqbal
{"title":"Assessing Outcomes in Clinical Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Tumors up to Two Centimeters in Diameter in Segmentectomy vs. Lobectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Hussain Sohail Rangwala, Hareer Fatima, Muhammad Saqlain Mustafa, Muhammad Ashir Shafique, Syed Irtiza Imam, Syed Raza Abbas, Qurat Ul Ain Qazi, Muhammad Osama Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, <i>p</i> = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, <i>p</i> = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, <i>p</i> = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, <i>p</i> = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":46707,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"16 1","pages":"279-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11920525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13193-024-02080-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lung cancer, which accounted for 1.8 million fatalities in 2020, necessitates the investigation of optimal surgical approaches for early-stage cases. Although lobectomy has long been associated with successful results, the growing interest in segmentectomy as an alternative procedure warrants further examination. The primary objective of this study was to compare segmentectomy with lobectomy as a viable treatment option for early-stage lung cancer. Our systematic review of NSCLC studies comparing lobectomy to segmentectomy followed the PRISMA guidelines and used a random-effects model. We extracted the patient characteristics, outcomes (overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence), and postoperative complications. Statistical analyses included hazard ratios, risk ratios, sensitivity assessments, and bias evaluations, all of which were performed using a random-effects model to account for heterogeneity among studies. Twelve studies involving 6049 patients revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy demonstrated comparable overall survival (OS), with an HR of 0.99 (95% CI 0.81-1.21, p = 0.90). At 24 and 60 months, OS rates were RR = 0.95 (95% CI 0.92-0.97, p = 0.0001) and RR = 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.98, p = 0.03), respectively. Similarly, disease-free survival (DFS) results were comparable (HR = 1.01; 95% CI 0.86-1.19, p = 0.87). DFS at 24 and 60 months demonstrated RR = 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-1.0, p = 0.05) and RR = 0.82 (95% CI 0.70-0.97, p = 0.02), respectively. The risk of lung cancer recurrence was similar between the two groups (RR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30, p = 0.26). Our study revealed that segmentectomy and lobectomy had identical oncological outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. Although segmentectomy showed a slightly higher complication rate, further research is needed to draw definitive conclusions, emphasizing the importance of additional randomized trials.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to encourage and promote clinical and research activities pertaining to Surgical Oncology. It also aims to bring in the concept of multidisciplinary team approach in management of various cancers. The Journal would publish original article, point of technique, review article, case report, letter to editor, profiles of eminent teachers, surgeons and instititions - a short (up to 500 words) of the Cancer Institutions, departments, and oncologist, who founded new departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信