Have the recent advancements in wound repair and scar management technology improved the quality of life in burn patients?

IF 3.2 3区医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE

Burns Pub Date : 2025-03-07 DOI:10.1016/j.burns.2025.107443

Bishara Atiyeh, Tarek F. El Hachem, Rawad Chalhoub, Saif E. Emsieh

{"title":"Have the recent advancements in wound repair and scar management technology improved the quality of life in burn patients?","authors":"Bishara Atiyeh, Tarek F. El Hachem, Rawad Chalhoub, Saif E. Emsieh","doi":"10.1016/j.burns.2025.107443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The negative physical and psychosocial impact of scars, in particular burn scars, has been well documented. Altered personal appearance together with impaired function related to pain, heat intolerance, and contracture formation may last a lifetime and eventually can lead to low self-esteem and poor social and psychological adjustments. Though most patients recover within the first years and many report generally good life satisfaction and moderate quality of life (QoL), some severely burned patients continue to report impaired QoL almost 10 years after injury. It is repeatedly mentioned in the literature that patients’ QoL and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be improved by improving wound healing and burn scar quality. Determining whether advances in burn wound healing and scar management modalities are positively impacting the lives of surviving patients is the aim of this review.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic literature review was used to identify studies measuring QoL of patients surviving severe burn injuries following various interventions to improve burn wound healing and scar quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A limited number of studies was identified. Given the limited available data, a narrative review approach including qualitative studies and reviews in addition to identifying common themes, trends, and gaps in the existing literature was deemed more appropriate for a comprehensive analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The assumption that progress made in recent decades to improve burn wound healing and scar quality would improve QoL remains largely hypothetical. Except for functional release of burn scar contractures, improved scar aesthetic quality does not necessarily translate into improved QoL of surviving patients. Well-designed comparative studies are largely lacking.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50717,"journal":{"name":"Burns","volume":"51 4","pages":"Article 107443"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305417925000725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The negative physical and psychosocial impact of scars, in particular burn scars, has been well documented. Altered personal appearance together with impaired function related to pain, heat intolerance, and contracture formation may last a lifetime and eventually can lead to low self-esteem and poor social and psychological adjustments. Though most patients recover within the first years and many report generally good life satisfaction and moderate quality of life (QoL), some severely burned patients continue to report impaired QoL almost 10 years after injury. It is repeatedly mentioned in the literature that patients’ QoL and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can be improved by improving wound healing and burn scar quality. Determining whether advances in burn wound healing and scar management modalities are positively impacting the lives of surviving patients is the aim of this review.

Methods

A systematic literature review was used to identify studies measuring QoL of patients surviving severe burn injuries following various interventions to improve burn wound healing and scar quality.

Results

A limited number of studies was identified. Given the limited available data, a narrative review approach including qualitative studies and reviews in addition to identifying common themes, trends, and gaps in the existing literature was deemed more appropriate for a comprehensive analysis.

Conclusion

The assumption that progress made in recent decades to improve burn wound healing and scar quality would improve QoL remains largely hypothetical. Except for functional release of burn scar contractures, improved scar aesthetic quality does not necessarily translate into improved QoL of surviving patients. Well-designed comparative studies are largely lacking.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Burns 医学-皮肤病学

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

18.50%

发文量

304

审稿时长

72 days

期刊介绍： Burns aims to foster the exchange of information among all engaged in preventing and treating the effects of burns. The journal focuses on clinical, scientific and social aspects of these injuries and covers the prevention of the injury, the epidemiology of such injuries and all aspects of treatment including development of new techniques and technologies and verification of existing ones. Regular features include clinical and scientific papers, state of the art reviews and descriptions of burn-care in practice. Topics covered by Burns include: the effects of smoke on man and animals, their tissues and cells; the responses to and treatment of patients and animals with chemical injuries to the skin; the biological and clinical effects of cold injuries; surgical techniques which are, or may be relevant to the treatment of burned patients during the acute or reconstructive phase following injury; well controlled laboratory studies of the effectiveness of anti-microbial agents on infection and new materials on scarring and healing; inflammatory responses to injury, effectiveness of related agents and other compounds used to modify the physiological and cellular responses to the injury; experimental studies of burns and the outcome of burn wound healing; regenerative medicine concerning the skin.