Ethical dilemmas and decision-making in emergency and critical care nursing in Western Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-method qualitative study.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Mastewal Ayehu Sinshaw
{"title":"Ethical dilemmas and decision-making in emergency and critical care nursing in Western Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia: a multi-method qualitative study.","authors":"Abebe Dilie Afenigus, Mastewal Ayehu Sinshaw","doi":"10.1186/s12912-025-02958-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ethical dilemmas in emergency and critical care nursing often involve complex decision-making that impacts patient outcomes, emotional well-being of healthcare providers, and team dynamics. Understanding these dilemmas and the decision-making processes involved is crucial for improving nursing practices and patient outcomes in this context.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes of emergency and critical care nurses, using the Four Box. Method ethical decision-making framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-method qualitative approach was employed, incorporating in-depth individual interviews (IDI), focus group discussions (FGD), and case studies to capture diverse perspectives. Data were collected from 28 nurses working in emergency and critical care settings at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital through purposive sampling. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, translated into English, and entered into OpenCode software for analysis. Inductive thematic analysis method was applied to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed several key ethical dilemmas faced by nurses, including balancing patient autonomy with beneficence, and the allocation of limited resources during crises, opioid administration for pain management vs. respiratory depression, and conflicts regarding informed consent. Nurses reported emotional and professional impacts from these dilemmas, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and ethical fatigue. Nurses emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and structured decision-making frameworks to navigate these challenges. However, the lack of consistent access to ethics consultations and peer support during critical moments was noted as a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and recommendation: </strong>Nurses encounter complex ethical dilemmas that impact their emotional well-being and job satisfaction. Effective decision-making requires applying ethical principles, adhering to guidelines, and consulting peers. The study reveals the need for improved support systems, including more frequent and comprehensive ethics training, better access to ethics consultations, and structured frameworks to guide decision-making in high-pressure situations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>The study is not a clinical trial, a clinical trial number is not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924746/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-02958-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ethical dilemmas in emergency and critical care nursing often involve complex decision-making that impacts patient outcomes, emotional well-being of healthcare providers, and team dynamics. Understanding these dilemmas and the decision-making processes involved is crucial for improving nursing practices and patient outcomes in this context.

Objective: This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas and decision-making processes of emergency and critical care nurses, using the Four Box. Method ethical decision-making framework.

Methods: A multi-method qualitative approach was employed, incorporating in-depth individual interviews (IDI), focus group discussions (FGD), and case studies to capture diverse perspectives. Data were collected from 28 nurses working in emergency and critical care settings at Tibebe Ghion Specialized Hospital and Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital through purposive sampling. The interviews and focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim in Amharic, translated into English, and entered into OpenCode software for analysis. Inductive thematic analysis method was applied to analyze the data.

Results: The study revealed several key ethical dilemmas faced by nurses, including balancing patient autonomy with beneficence, and the allocation of limited resources during crises, opioid administration for pain management vs. respiratory depression, and conflicts regarding informed consent. Nurses reported emotional and professional impacts from these dilemmas, contributing to moral distress, burnout, and ethical fatigue. Nurses emphasized the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and structured decision-making frameworks to navigate these challenges. However, the lack of consistent access to ethics consultations and peer support during critical moments was noted as a significant barrier.

Conclusion and recommendation: Nurses encounter complex ethical dilemmas that impact their emotional well-being and job satisfaction. Effective decision-making requires applying ethical principles, adhering to guidelines, and consulting peers. The study reveals the need for improved support systems, including more frequent and comprehensive ethics training, better access to ethics consultations, and structured frameworks to guide decision-making in high-pressure situations.

Clinical trial registration: The study is not a clinical trial, a clinical trial number is not applicable.

埃塞俄比亚西北部西阿姆哈拉地区急诊和重症护理中的伦理困境与决策:一项采用多种方法的定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信