Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Manrui Zhang, Brocha Z Stern, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Neil Jordan, Anne Deutsch
{"title":"Organizational and Service Management Interventions for Improving the Patient Experience With Care: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness.","authors":"Tiago S Jesus, Dongwook Lee, Manrui Zhang, Brocha Z Stern, Jan Struhar, Allen W Heinemann, Neil Jordan, Anne Deutsch","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare managers and administrators increasingly need to develop systems, structures and operations capable of improving the patient experience performance of their organisations or service delivery units.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To systematically review the effectiveness of organizational and service management interventions on standardized patient experience measure scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six scientific databases, speciality journals and snowballing were used to identify English-language, peer-reviewed, contemporary studies (2015-2023) that examined the impact of service management or organizational interventions on the patient experience as a primary outcome. The studies needed to include inferential statistics on standardized, patient-reported experience measures. Two independent reviewers performed the eligibility decisions and risk-of-bias appraisals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine papers were finally included. Three papers were on discrete, service-level interventions, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one pre-post study; one RCT achieved significant improvements by delaying the timing of bedside rounding versus maintaining the early morning schedule. One non-randomized controlled study and two pre-post studies addressed organisation-wide approaches. Among those, one pre-post study achieved significant improvements by having site managers meet regularly with an organizational oversight committee to compare the units' patient-experience performance and setting improvement expectations. Finally, three observational, multi-site comparative studies were included. These addressed self-reported improvement approaches, implementation of a nursing excellence certification programme, and implementation of Patient Experience Offices. The latter was significantly associated with improved patient experience performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Selected discrete service-level interventions and organizational approaches can lead to better patient experience outcomes, even though the evidence from the pre-post and observational studies should be interpreted with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Healthcare managers and administrators increasingly need to develop systems, structures and operations capable of improving the patient experience performance of their organisations or service delivery units.
Aim: To systematically review the effectiveness of organizational and service management interventions on standardized patient experience measure scores.
Methods: Six scientific databases, speciality journals and snowballing were used to identify English-language, peer-reviewed, contemporary studies (2015-2023) that examined the impact of service management or organizational interventions on the patient experience as a primary outcome. The studies needed to include inferential statistics on standardized, patient-reported experience measures. Two independent reviewers performed the eligibility decisions and risk-of-bias appraisals.
Results: Nine papers were finally included. Three papers were on discrete, service-level interventions, including two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one pre-post study; one RCT achieved significant improvements by delaying the timing of bedside rounding versus maintaining the early morning schedule. One non-randomized controlled study and two pre-post studies addressed organisation-wide approaches. Among those, one pre-post study achieved significant improvements by having site managers meet regularly with an organizational oversight committee to compare the units' patient-experience performance and setting improvement expectations. Finally, three observational, multi-site comparative studies were included. These addressed self-reported improvement approaches, implementation of a nursing excellence certification programme, and implementation of Patient Experience Offices. The latter was significantly associated with improved patient experience performance.
Conclusion: Selected discrete service-level interventions and organizational approaches can lead to better patient experience outcomes, even though the evidence from the pre-post and observational studies should be interpreted with caution.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.