From 'Sovereign Self-Proclaimed Experts' to 'Impressionable Sceptics'-Developing a Patient Typology to Distinguish Patients' Interactions With Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in Germany.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Katharina Achstetter, Miriam Blümel, Julia Röttger, Julia Köppen, Katherine Polin, Reinhard Busse
{"title":"From 'Sovereign Self-Proclaimed Experts' to 'Impressionable Sceptics'-Developing a Patient Typology to Distinguish Patients' Interactions With Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in Germany.","authors":"Katharina Achstetter, Miriam Blümel, Julia Röttger, Julia Köppen, Katherine Polin, Reinhard Busse","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-centredness in health systems puts patients and their preferences at the centre of healthcare. However, there is not an 'one size fits all' approach as patients are heterogenous and have varying interactions with and perceptions of healthcare, and assessments of the health system performance. This study aims to explore these patient differences by (1) identifying core attributes of patients that shape their general approach to and interactions with healthcare and (2) deriving specific patient types based on these core attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The qualitative study included content analysis of semi-structured, problem-oriented interviews with 27 participants selected with the aim of maximum variation and heterogeneity (e.g., regarding age, gender, health status, place of living) from the Berlin-Brandenburg region of Germany.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the interviews with the participants, three core patient attributes were found that shape interactions with healthcare: (1) taking care of health and illness, (2) the self-assigned patient role, and (3) the patient-assigned healthcare provider role. Seven patient types were identified across (opposing) manifestations of these core attributes, ranging from 'sovereign self-proclaimed experts' (focussing-autonomous-fulfiller) to 'impressionable sceptics' (ignoring-heteronomous-seller).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consideration of the identified patient types and their different ways of engaging with healthcare providers and their varying perceptions of the health system can help to develop strategies to promote person-centredness in health systems. Furthermore, this typology can inform providers about the diverse ways in which patients may perceive healthcare interactions, and it can be useful for the training of future physicians and other healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Person-centredness in health systems puts patients and their preferences at the centre of healthcare. However, there is not an 'one size fits all' approach as patients are heterogenous and have varying interactions with and perceptions of healthcare, and assessments of the health system performance. This study aims to explore these patient differences by (1) identifying core attributes of patients that shape their general approach to and interactions with healthcare and (2) deriving specific patient types based on these core attributes.

Methods: The qualitative study included content analysis of semi-structured, problem-oriented interviews with 27 participants selected with the aim of maximum variation and heterogeneity (e.g., regarding age, gender, health status, place of living) from the Berlin-Brandenburg region of Germany.

Results: Based on the interviews with the participants, three core patient attributes were found that shape interactions with healthcare: (1) taking care of health and illness, (2) the self-assigned patient role, and (3) the patient-assigned healthcare provider role. Seven patient types were identified across (opposing) manifestations of these core attributes, ranging from 'sovereign self-proclaimed experts' (focussing-autonomous-fulfiller) to 'impressionable sceptics' (ignoring-heteronomous-seller).

Conclusion: Consideration of the identified patient types and their different ways of engaging with healthcare providers and their varying perceptions of the health system can help to develop strategies to promote person-centredness in health systems. Furthermore, this typology can inform providers about the diverse ways in which patients may perceive healthcare interactions, and it can be useful for the training of future physicians and other healthcare professionals.

从“主权自封的专家”到“易受影响的怀疑论者”——发展一种患者类型来区分患者与医疗保健的互动:德国的一项定性研究。
背景:卫生系统以人为本,将患者及其偏好置于卫生保健的中心。然而,并没有一种“放之四海而皆准”的方法,因为患者是异质的,与医疗保健的相互作用和看法以及对卫生系统绩效的评估各不相同。本研究旨在通过(1)确定患者的核心属性来探索这些患者差异,这些核心属性塑造了他们与医疗保健的一般方法和互动,(2)基于这些核心属性派生出特定的患者类型。方法:质性研究包括半结构化、问题导向访谈的内容分析,选取来自德国柏林-勃兰登堡地区的27名参与者,以最大差异和异质性(如年龄、性别、健康状况、居住地)为目的。结果:基于对参与者的访谈,发现了三个核心患者属性:(1)照顾健康和疾病,(2)自我指定的患者角色,(3)患者指定的医疗保健提供者角色。在这些核心属性的(相反的)表现中,确定了七种患者类型,从“主权自封的专家”(专注-自主-履行者)到“易受影响的怀疑论者”(忽视-异己-卖方)。结论:考虑已确定的患者类型及其与卫生保健提供者接触的不同方式以及他们对卫生系统的不同看法,有助于制定促进卫生系统以人为本的策略。此外,这种类型可以告知提供者关于患者可能感知医疗保健互动的不同方式,并且它可以用于培训未来的医生和其他医疗保健专业人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信