From 'Sovereign Self-Proclaimed Experts' to 'Impressionable Sceptics'-Developing a Patient Typology to Distinguish Patients' Interactions With Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in Germany.
Katharina Achstetter, Miriam Blümel, Julia Röttger, Julia Köppen, Katherine Polin, Reinhard Busse
{"title":"From 'Sovereign Self-Proclaimed Experts' to 'Impressionable Sceptics'-Developing a Patient Typology to Distinguish Patients' Interactions With Healthcare: A Qualitative Study in Germany.","authors":"Katharina Achstetter, Miriam Blümel, Julia Röttger, Julia Köppen, Katherine Polin, Reinhard Busse","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Person-centredness in health systems puts patients and their preferences at the centre of healthcare. However, there is not an 'one size fits all' approach as patients are heterogenous and have varying interactions with and perceptions of healthcare, and assessments of the health system performance. This study aims to explore these patient differences by (1) identifying core attributes of patients that shape their general approach to and interactions with healthcare and (2) deriving specific patient types based on these core attributes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The qualitative study included content analysis of semi-structured, problem-oriented interviews with 27 participants selected with the aim of maximum variation and heterogeneity (e.g., regarding age, gender, health status, place of living) from the Berlin-Brandenburg region of Germany.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on the interviews with the participants, three core patient attributes were found that shape interactions with healthcare: (1) taking care of health and illness, (2) the self-assigned patient role, and (3) the patient-assigned healthcare provider role. Seven patient types were identified across (opposing) manifestations of these core attributes, ranging from 'sovereign self-proclaimed experts' (focussing-autonomous-fulfiller) to 'impressionable sceptics' (ignoring-heteronomous-seller).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Consideration of the identified patient types and their different ways of engaging with healthcare providers and their varying perceptions of the health system can help to develop strategies to promote person-centredness in health systems. Furthermore, this typology can inform providers about the diverse ways in which patients may perceive healthcare interactions, and it can be useful for the training of future physicians and other healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Person-centredness in health systems puts patients and their preferences at the centre of healthcare. However, there is not an 'one size fits all' approach as patients are heterogenous and have varying interactions with and perceptions of healthcare, and assessments of the health system performance. This study aims to explore these patient differences by (1) identifying core attributes of patients that shape their general approach to and interactions with healthcare and (2) deriving specific patient types based on these core attributes.
Methods: The qualitative study included content analysis of semi-structured, problem-oriented interviews with 27 participants selected with the aim of maximum variation and heterogeneity (e.g., regarding age, gender, health status, place of living) from the Berlin-Brandenburg region of Germany.
Results: Based on the interviews with the participants, three core patient attributes were found that shape interactions with healthcare: (1) taking care of health and illness, (2) the self-assigned patient role, and (3) the patient-assigned healthcare provider role. Seven patient types were identified across (opposing) manifestations of these core attributes, ranging from 'sovereign self-proclaimed experts' (focussing-autonomous-fulfiller) to 'impressionable sceptics' (ignoring-heteronomous-seller).
Conclusion: Consideration of the identified patient types and their different ways of engaging with healthcare providers and their varying perceptions of the health system can help to develop strategies to promote person-centredness in health systems. Furthermore, this typology can inform providers about the diverse ways in which patients may perceive healthcare interactions, and it can be useful for the training of future physicians and other healthcare professionals.
期刊介绍:
Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.