eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: an international consensus study.

IF 3.5 3区医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY

European Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1007/s41999-025-01170-7

Jules J M Kraaijkamp, Anke Persoon, Niels H Chavannes, Wilco P Achterberg, Mohamed-Amine Choukou, Frances Dockery, Hyub Kim, Laura M Pérez, José E Pompeu, Eva Topinkova, Mark A Vassallo, Andrea B Maier, Clemens Becker, Yoshiaki Amagasa, Marije S Holstege, Jolanda van Haastregt, Eléonore F van Dam van Isselt

{"title":"eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation: an international consensus study.","authors":"Jules J M Kraaijkamp, Anke Persoon, Niels H Chavannes, Wilco P Achterberg, Mohamed-Amine Choukou, Frances Dockery, Hyub Kim, Laura M Pérez, José E Pompeu, Eva Topinkova, Mark A Vassallo, Andrea B Maier, Clemens Becker, Yoshiaki Amagasa, Marije S Holstege, Jolanda van Haastregt, Eléonore F van Dam van Isselt","doi":"10.1007/s41999-025-01170-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Current evidence on the use of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation is limited. This aim of this study was to achieve international consensus on three key eHealth-related topics in geriatric rehabilitation: the use, domains, and scientific evaluation of eHealth. Additionally, we developed a model that provides insight into the use of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation.Methods: An international, two-round Delphi study was conducted. Two models served as a framework for the initial statement draft, with a total of 28 statements based on our systematic review results, an international survey, and expert opinion. Eligible healthcare professionals working in geriatric rehabilitation facilities were recruited across 10 countries.Results: Eighty healthcare professionals participated in round one and 47 in round two. In the first round, consensus was obtained for 20 of the 28 statements (71%). Prior to round two, four statements were revised, two statements were combined, and one statement was removed. In round two, consensus was obtained on six statements, bringing the total to 26: three related to the use of eHealth, five to the domains of eHealth, and 18 related to the scientific evaluation of eHealth.Conclusion: International consensus has been reached on the use, domains, and scientific evaluation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation. This first step in generating reliable knowledge and understandable information will help promote a consistent approach to the development, implementation, and scientific evaluation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation.","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-025-01170-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Current evidence on the use of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation is limited. This aim of this study was to achieve international consensus on three key eHealth-related topics in geriatric rehabilitation: the use, domains, and scientific evaluation of eHealth. Additionally, we developed a model that provides insight into the use of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation.

Methods: An international, two-round Delphi study was conducted. Two models served as a framework for the initial statement draft, with a total of 28 statements based on our systematic review results, an international survey, and expert opinion. Eligible healthcare professionals working in geriatric rehabilitation facilities were recruited across 10 countries.

Results: Eighty healthcare professionals participated in round one and 47 in round two. In the first round, consensus was obtained for 20 of the 28 statements (71%). Prior to round two, four statements were revised, two statements were combined, and one statement was removed. In round two, consensus was obtained on six statements, bringing the total to 26: three related to the use of eHealth, five to the domains of eHealth, and 18 related to the scientific evaluation of eHealth.

Conclusion: International consensus has been reached on the use, domains, and scientific evaluation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation. This first step in generating reliable knowledge and understandable information will help promote a consistent approach to the development, implementation, and scientific evaluation of eHealth in geriatric rehabilitation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-

CiteScore

6.70

自引率

2.60%

发文量

114

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.