[Predictive value of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity parameters for malignant arrhythmias in children with viral myocarditis].

Q3 Medicine
X L Lian, T Sun, H X Wang, J Y Xu, Y M Wang, J P Yang
{"title":"[Predictive value of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity parameters for malignant arrhythmias in children with viral myocarditis].","authors":"X L Lian, T Sun, H X Wang, J Y Xu, Y M Wang, J P Yang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241115-02564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the construction and clinical value of a predictive model for malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) in children with viral myocarditis (VMC) based on parameters of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 99 children with VMC admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2019 to February 2023 as the training set, and 38 children with VMC admitted from March 2023 to May 2024 as the external validation set in a cross-sectional study. Patients were divided into MVA and non-MVA groups based on the occurrence of MVA. We measured QT interval (QT), corrected QT interval (QTc), T-wave peak-end interval (TpTe), and heart rate-corrected TpTe (TpTec) in all children using conventional electrocardiography and Holter monitoring. Multi-variate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the occurrence of MVA in children with VMC and the efficacy of models predicting MVA with cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and different electrocardiographic parameters was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The predictive power of the models was internally and externally validated through C-index, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, ROC curves, and decision curve analysis. <b>Results:</b> There were 99 children in the training set and 38 in the external validation set, with no significant differences in age [(6.9±3.7) vs (6.9±3.4) years] and gender (boys: 46.5% vs 50.0%) between the two groups (all <i>P</i>>0.05). In the training set, there were 47 cases (47.5%) in the MVA group, and there were 20 cases (52.6%) in the MVA group in the external validation set. In both the training and external validation sets, there were statistically significant differences in cTnI, QTc, TpTec, and TpTe/QT between the MVA and non-MVA groups (<i>P</i><0.01). TpTec [<i>OR</i> (95%<i>CI</i>): 1.123 (1.067-1.183)] and TpTe/QT [<i>OR</i> (95%<i>CI</i>): 1.026 (1.008-1.045)] were both associated with the occurrence of MVA in children with VMC. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the predicted and observed values (<i>P</i>=0.294). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) (95%<i>CI</i>) for cTnI to predict MVA in VMC children was 0.651 (0.540-0.763), with a sensitivity of 0.617 and a specificity of 0.865 when the Youden's index was maximized (2 475.000). For TpTec, the AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) was 0.917 (0.859-0.975), with a sensitivity of 0.723 and a specificity of 0.981 when the Youden's index was maximized (110.500). For TpTe/QT, the AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) was 0.825 (0.746-0.905), with a sensitivity of 0.745 and a specificity of 0.750 when the Youden's index was maximized (0.265). The AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) for the combination of TpTec and TpTe/QT was 0.939 (0.892-0.987), with a sensitivity of 0.894 and a specificity of 0.865 when the Youden's index was maximized (0.472), which was higher than that of TpTe/QT (<i>P<</i>0.01). In the validation set, the accuracy and fit of the TpTec combined with TpTe/QT model were also good (<i>P</i>=0.800), and the AUC (95%<i>CI</i>) for predicting MVA was 0.992 (0.972-1.000), with a sensitivity of 0.936 and a specificity of 0.904 when the Youden's index was maximized (0.557). <b>Conclusions:</b> TpTec≥110.50 ms and TpTe/QT≥0.265 indicate a potential risk of MVA in children with VMC, requiring close clinical attention. The predictive value of the combined TpTec and TpTe/QT for MVA in children with VMC is higher than that of TpTe/QT alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":24023,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","volume":"105 12","pages":"912-918"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua yi xue za zhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20241115-02564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the construction and clinical value of a predictive model for malignant ventricular arrhythmias (MVA) in children with viral myocarditis (VMC) based on parameters of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 99 children with VMC admitted to Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2019 to February 2023 as the training set, and 38 children with VMC admitted from March 2023 to May 2024 as the external validation set in a cross-sectional study. Patients were divided into MVA and non-MVA groups based on the occurrence of MVA. We measured QT interval (QT), corrected QT interval (QTc), T-wave peak-end interval (TpTe), and heart rate-corrected TpTe (TpTec) in all children using conventional electrocardiography and Holter monitoring. Multi-variate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing the occurrence of MVA in children with VMC and the efficacy of models predicting MVA with cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and different electrocardiographic parameters was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The predictive power of the models was internally and externally validated through C-index, Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test, ROC curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: There were 99 children in the training set and 38 in the external validation set, with no significant differences in age [(6.9±3.7) vs (6.9±3.4) years] and gender (boys: 46.5% vs 50.0%) between the two groups (all P>0.05). In the training set, there were 47 cases (47.5%) in the MVA group, and there were 20 cases (52.6%) in the MVA group in the external validation set. In both the training and external validation sets, there were statistically significant differences in cTnI, QTc, TpTec, and TpTe/QT between the MVA and non-MVA groups (P<0.01). TpTec [OR (95%CI): 1.123 (1.067-1.183)] and TpTe/QT [OR (95%CI): 1.026 (1.008-1.045)] were both associated with the occurrence of MVA in children with VMC. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the predicted and observed values (P=0.294). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) (95%CI) for cTnI to predict MVA in VMC children was 0.651 (0.540-0.763), with a sensitivity of 0.617 and a specificity of 0.865 when the Youden's index was maximized (2 475.000). For TpTec, the AUC (95%CI) was 0.917 (0.859-0.975), with a sensitivity of 0.723 and a specificity of 0.981 when the Youden's index was maximized (110.500). For TpTe/QT, the AUC (95%CI) was 0.825 (0.746-0.905), with a sensitivity of 0.745 and a specificity of 0.750 when the Youden's index was maximized (0.265). The AUC (95%CI) for the combination of TpTec and TpTe/QT was 0.939 (0.892-0.987), with a sensitivity of 0.894 and a specificity of 0.865 when the Youden's index was maximized (0.472), which was higher than that of TpTe/QT (P<0.01). In the validation set, the accuracy and fit of the TpTec combined with TpTe/QT model were also good (P=0.800), and the AUC (95%CI) for predicting MVA was 0.992 (0.972-1.000), with a sensitivity of 0.936 and a specificity of 0.904 when the Youden's index was maximized (0.557). Conclusions: TpTec≥110.50 ms and TpTe/QT≥0.265 indicate a potential risk of MVA in children with VMC, requiring close clinical attention. The predictive value of the combined TpTec and TpTe/QT for MVA in children with VMC is higher than that of TpTe/QT alone.

[病毒性心肌炎患儿心室复极异质参数对恶性心律失常的预测价值]。
目的:探讨基于心室复极异质性参数的病毒性心肌炎(VMC)患儿恶性室性心律失常(MVA)预测模型的构建及临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2019年1月至2023年2月河南省人民医院收治的99例VMC患儿作为训练集,2023年3月至2024年5月收治的38例VMC患儿作为外部验证集,采用横断面研究方法。根据MVA的发生情况将患者分为MVA组和非MVA组。我们测量了所有儿童的QT间期(QT)、校正QT间期(QTc)、t波峰端间期(TpTe)和心率校正TpTe (TpTec),采用常规心电图和动态心电图监测。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定影响VMC患儿MVA发生的因素,并采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价心肌肌钙蛋白I (cTnI)和不同心电图参数预测MVA的模型的有效性。通过c指数、Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验、ROC曲线、决策曲线分析对模型的预测能力进行内外验证。结果:训练组患儿99例,外部验证组患儿38例,两组间年龄[(6.9±3.7)岁vs(6.9±3.4)岁]、性别(男孩46.5% vs 50.0%)差异无统计学意义(P均为0.05)。在训练集中,MVA组有47例(47.5%),外部验证集中MVA组有20例(52.6%)。在训练组和外部验证组中,MVA组和非MVA组的cTnI、QTc、TpTec和TpTe/QT差异均有统计学意义(POR (95%CI): 1.123 (1.067-1.183)), TpTe/QT [OR (95%CI): 1.026(1.008-1.045)]均与VMC患儿MVA的发生有关。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验显示预测值与实测值无统计学差异(P=0.294)。cTnI预测VMC患儿MVA的ROC曲线下面积(AUC) (95%CI)为0.651(0.54 -0.763),约登指数最大时的敏感性为0.617,特异性为0.865(2 475.000)。TpTec的AUC (95%CI)为0.917(0.859 ~ 0.975),当约登指数达到最大值(110.500)时,敏感性为0.723,特异性为0.981。TpTe/QT的AUC (95%CI)为0.825(0.746 ~ 0.905),约登指数最大(0.265)时的敏感性为0.745,特异性为0.750。TpTec与TpTe/QT联合应用的AUC (95%CI)为0.939(0.892 ~ 0.987),约登指数最大时的敏感性为0.894,特异性为0.865(0.472),均高于TpTe/QT联合应用(P0.01)。在验证集中,TpTec联合TpTe/QT模型的准确性和拟合性也较好(P=0.800),预测MVA的AUC (95%CI)为0.992(0.972 ~ 1.000),当约登指数最大化(0.557)时,敏感性为0.936,特异性为0.904。结论:TpTec≥110.50 ms, TpTe/QT≥0.265提示VMC患儿存在MVA的潜在风险,需要密切关注。联合TpTec和TpTe/QT对VMC患儿MVA的预测价值高于单独TpTe/QT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi
Zhonghua yi xue za zhi Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
400
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信