[Estimation of Vegetation Carbon Source/sink and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Loess Plateau,A Case Study of Yanhe River Basin].

Q2 Environmental Science
Ya-Bing Guan, Jun Wang, Li Tan, Sheng-Tian Yang, Wen-Wu Zhao, Ke Chen, Xi-Tong Zhang
{"title":"[Estimation of Vegetation Carbon Source/sink and Its Response to Land Use Change in the Loess Plateau,A Case Study of Yanhe River Basin].","authors":"Ya-Bing Guan, Jun Wang, Li Tan, Sheng-Tian Yang, Wen-Wu Zhao, Ke Chen, Xi-Tong Zhang","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202312169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The transformation of ecosystem types caused by land use change plays an extremely important role in the regional carbon cycle. Studying the response of vegetation carbon source/sink systems to land use change is helpful to improve the understanding of the vegetation carbon sink effect in the process of land use change. However, few studies have focused on the response of vegetation carbon sources/sinks to land use change. The CASA model and soil microbial respiration model were combined to estimate the net ecosystem productivity (NEP) of vegetation in the Yanhe River Basin in the Chinese Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2020 based on remote sensing, meteorological, and land use data. The spatiotemporal pattern evolution characteristics of the carbon source/sink and land use were identified using a significance test, univariate linear regression analysis, and land use status transition matrix methods, and the response of the carbon source/sink to land use change was further analyzed. The results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the multi-year average NEP in the Yanhe River Basin showed a spatial distribution pattern of lower in the upstream and higher in the midstream and downstream. The Yanhe River Basin belonged to a weak carbon sink area as a whole, with this type of area accounting for 88.81% of the basin area. The annual NEP of the basin showed a significant increase trend in fluctuations, and the carbon sequestration capacity was gradually improving. The areas with significant and extremely significant increases in annual NEP accounted for 65.78% of the basin area, and the types of annual NEP restoration, basic stability, and degradation accounted for 79.70%, 10.15%, and 10.15% of the basin area, respectively. Over the past 20 years, the land use transformation of Yanhe River Basin mainly included five types, that is, cropland was converted into grassland, woodland, and construction land, and grassland was converted into cropland and woodland. The land use in the Yanhe River Basin was mainly shifting towards promoting the improvement of the carbon sink capacity, and the transformation of land type to woodland had a more significant effect on improving carbon sink capacity. During the five main land use transformation processes in the Yanhe River Basin, the area ratio of NEP recovery-recovery type for cropland shifting to woodland was the highest at 80.78%. The area ratios of NEP recovery-recovery type for grassland shifting to cropland and cropland shifting to grassland were relatively low, at 48.05% and 51.97%, respectively. The stability of NEP restoration when shifting cropland to woodland was the strongest, and the fluctuation of NEP restoration when shifting between cropland and grassland mutually was strong. When adjusting cropland and grassland mutually, attention should be paid to select suitable vegetation types and increase vegetation coverage reasonably to improve carbon sequestration and sink enhancement capabilities, so as to avoid carbon losses during land transformations. The research methods and results in this study can provide reference for land management departments to formulate scientific and reasonable land use decisions to promote vegetation carbon sequestration and sink enhancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 3","pages":"1657-1665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202312169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transformation of ecosystem types caused by land use change plays an extremely important role in the regional carbon cycle. Studying the response of vegetation carbon source/sink systems to land use change is helpful to improve the understanding of the vegetation carbon sink effect in the process of land use change. However, few studies have focused on the response of vegetation carbon sources/sinks to land use change. The CASA model and soil microbial respiration model were combined to estimate the net ecosystem productivity (NEP) of vegetation in the Yanhe River Basin in the Chinese Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2020 based on remote sensing, meteorological, and land use data. The spatiotemporal pattern evolution characteristics of the carbon source/sink and land use were identified using a significance test, univariate linear regression analysis, and land use status transition matrix methods, and the response of the carbon source/sink to land use change was further analyzed. The results showed that from 2000 to 2020, the multi-year average NEP in the Yanhe River Basin showed a spatial distribution pattern of lower in the upstream and higher in the midstream and downstream. The Yanhe River Basin belonged to a weak carbon sink area as a whole, with this type of area accounting for 88.81% of the basin area. The annual NEP of the basin showed a significant increase trend in fluctuations, and the carbon sequestration capacity was gradually improving. The areas with significant and extremely significant increases in annual NEP accounted for 65.78% of the basin area, and the types of annual NEP restoration, basic stability, and degradation accounted for 79.70%, 10.15%, and 10.15% of the basin area, respectively. Over the past 20 years, the land use transformation of Yanhe River Basin mainly included five types, that is, cropland was converted into grassland, woodland, and construction land, and grassland was converted into cropland and woodland. The land use in the Yanhe River Basin was mainly shifting towards promoting the improvement of the carbon sink capacity, and the transformation of land type to woodland had a more significant effect on improving carbon sink capacity. During the five main land use transformation processes in the Yanhe River Basin, the area ratio of NEP recovery-recovery type for cropland shifting to woodland was the highest at 80.78%. The area ratios of NEP recovery-recovery type for grassland shifting to cropland and cropland shifting to grassland were relatively low, at 48.05% and 51.97%, respectively. The stability of NEP restoration when shifting cropland to woodland was the strongest, and the fluctuation of NEP restoration when shifting between cropland and grassland mutually was strong. When adjusting cropland and grassland mutually, attention should be paid to select suitable vegetation types and increase vegetation coverage reasonably to improve carbon sequestration and sink enhancement capabilities, so as to avoid carbon losses during land transformations. The research methods and results in this study can provide reference for land management departments to formulate scientific and reasonable land use decisions to promote vegetation carbon sequestration and sink enhancement.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信