Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Focused Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Based on Rupture Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Meah T Ahmed, Anand Kaul, Joanna Roy, Basel Musmar, Santiago D Mendoza-Ayús, Morena P Koorie, Cheritesh R Amaravadi, Antony A Fuleihan, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Michael R Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal Jabbour
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Stereotactic Radiosurgery Focused Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Based on Rupture Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Meah T Ahmed, Anand Kaul, Joanna Roy, Basel Musmar, Santiago D Mendoza-Ayús, Morena P Koorie, Cheritesh R Amaravadi, Antony A Fuleihan, Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris, Michael R Gooch, Robert H Rosenwasser, Pascal Jabbour","doi":"10.1007/s12975-025-01339-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive treatment option for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). However, SRS cures are delayed, making it less favorable for higher risk ruptured bAVMs (rbAVMs) than unruptured (ubAVMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the long-term outcomes of SRS-focused protocols for rbAVMs and ubAVMs. This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and hand-search on January 30th, 2025. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies: distinguishing cohorts by rupture status, reporting post-SRS outcomes, and without overlapping series. Pooled analysis was performed from 24 articles using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. All analyses were performed using R. For rbAVMs, the pooled rupture, obliteration, and mortality rates were 7.14% (95% CI: 5.76%-8.64%), 65.0% (95% CI: 57.2%-72.4%), and 0.87% (95% CI: 0.00%-5.14%), respectively, and for ubAVMs, 6.13% (95% CI: 4.71%-7.69%), 59.5% (95% CI: 51.3%-67.3%), and 0.89% (95% CI: 0.00%-3.82%), respectively. Subgroup meta-analyses of rupture rates and obliteration rates showed no significant differences based on prior treatments (Q = 2.47, p = 0.48; Q = 4.34, p = 0.23; respectively) or volume-staging protocols (Q = 4.90, p = 0.18; Q = 1.12, p = 0.77, respectively). Meta-regression analysis for rbAVMs demonstrated a positive correlation between intranidal aneurysms and rupture rate (p < 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 100%), an inverse correlation between Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I-II bAVMs and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 68.6%), and a positive correlation between SM grade III-V bAVMs and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 68.0%). Meta-regression analysis for ubAVMs demonstrated an inverse correlation between eloquent-region lesions and rupture rate (p < 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 31.3%), and surprisingly a positive correlation between mean age and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R<sup>2</sup> = 23.8%). SRS-focused studies show similar long-term outcomes regardless of rupture status, but presence of underlying factors indicates the need for individualized risk-benefit analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01339-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a non-invasive treatment option for brain arteriovenous malformations (bAVMs). However, SRS cures are delayed, making it less favorable for higher risk ruptured bAVMs (rbAVMs) than unruptured (ubAVMs). This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the long-term outcomes of SRS-focused protocols for rbAVMs and ubAVMs. This study adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and hand-search on January 30th, 2025. The inclusion criteria encompassed studies: distinguishing cohorts by rupture status, reporting post-SRS outcomes, and without overlapping series. Pooled analysis was performed from 24 articles using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were also conducted. All analyses were performed using R. For rbAVMs, the pooled rupture, obliteration, and mortality rates were 7.14% (95% CI: 5.76%-8.64%), 65.0% (95% CI: 57.2%-72.4%), and 0.87% (95% CI: 0.00%-5.14%), respectively, and for ubAVMs, 6.13% (95% CI: 4.71%-7.69%), 59.5% (95% CI: 51.3%-67.3%), and 0.89% (95% CI: 0.00%-3.82%), respectively. Subgroup meta-analyses of rupture rates and obliteration rates showed no significant differences based on prior treatments (Q = 2.47, p = 0.48; Q = 4.34, p = 0.23; respectively) or volume-staging protocols (Q = 4.90, p = 0.18; Q = 1.12, p = 0.77, respectively). Meta-regression analysis for rbAVMs demonstrated a positive correlation between intranidal aneurysms and rupture rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 100%), an inverse correlation between Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade I-II bAVMs and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 68.6%), and a positive correlation between SM grade III-V bAVMs and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 68.0%). Meta-regression analysis for ubAVMs demonstrated an inverse correlation between eloquent-region lesions and rupture rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 31.3%), and surprisingly a positive correlation between mean age and obliteration rate (p < 0.05, R2 = 23.8%). SRS-focused studies show similar long-term outcomes regardless of rupture status, but presence of underlying factors indicates the need for individualized risk-benefit analysis.

基于破裂状态的立体定向放射外科聚焦治疗脑动静脉畸形的长期疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
立体定向放射外科(SRS)是脑动静脉畸形(bAVMs)的一种非侵入性治疗选择。然而,SRS治疗延迟,使得其对高风险的破裂性脑血管瘤(rbavm)比未破裂性脑血管瘤(ubavm)更不利。本系统综述和荟萃分析探讨了以srs为重点的rbavm和ubavm方案的长期结果。本研究遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。文献检索于2025年1月30日使用PubMed, Ovid Medline, Scopus和hand-search进行。纳入标准包括研究:根据破裂状态区分队列,报告srs后结果,无重叠系列。采用dersimonan - laird随机效应模型对24篇文章进行了汇总分析。并进行亚组和元回归分析。所有分析均使用r进行。对于rbavm,合并破裂、闭塞和死亡率分别为7.14% (95% CI: 5.76%-8.64%)、65.0% (95% CI: 57.2%-72.4%)和0.87% (95% CI: 0.00%-5.14%),对于ubavm,分别为6.13% (95% CI: 4.71%-7.69%)、59.5% (95% CI: 51.3%-67.3%)和0.89% (95% CI: 0.00%-3.82%)。亚组荟萃分析显示,先前治疗的破裂率和闭塞率无显著差异(Q = 2.47, p = 0.48;Q = 4.34, p = 0.23;分别)或卷分期方案(Q = 4.90, p = 0.18;Q = 1.12, p = 0.77)。meta -回归分析显示,膜内动脉瘤与破裂率呈正相关(p 2 = 100%), Spetzler-Martin (SM) I-II级动脉瘤与闭塞率呈负相关(p 2 = 68.6%), SM III-V级动脉瘤与闭塞率呈正相关(p 2 = 68.0%)。uavms的meta回归分析显示雄辩区病变与破裂率呈负相关(p 2 = 31.3%),令人惊讶的是,平均年龄与闭塞率呈正相关(p 2 = 23.8%)。以srs为重点的研究表明,无论破裂状态如何,长期结果相似,但潜在因素的存在表明需要进行个性化的风险-收益分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信