Implementation, effectiveness, and barriers of obstetric triage in reducing waiting time: a scoping review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Abel F Dadi, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Subash Thapa, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Tahir A Hassen, Abdulbasit Seid, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Meless G Bore, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Daniel Bogale Odo, Erkihun Amsalu, Sewunet Admasu Belachew, Desalegn Markos Shifti, Kedir Y Ahmed
{"title":"Implementation, effectiveness, and barriers of obstetric triage in reducing waiting time: a scoping review.","authors":"Zemenu Yohannes Kassa, Abel F Dadi, Habtamu Mellie Bizuayehu, Subash Thapa, Getiye Dejenu Kibret, Tahir A Hassen, Abdulbasit Seid, Daniel Bekele Ketema, Meless G Bore, Teketo Kassaw Tegegne, Daniel Bogale Odo, Erkihun Amsalu, Sewunet Admasu Belachew, Desalegn Markos Shifti, Kedir Y Ahmed","doi":"10.1186/s12978-025-01982-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The assessment of a pregnant woman typically begins at obstetric triage, where healthcare providers evaluate whether life-altering decisions are necessary for the woman and her unborn baby. This scoping review aimed to assess the lack of comprehensive evaluation of across diverse settings of the evidence on the effectiveness, implementation, and barriers to the successful implementation of obstetric triage during pregnancy and childbirth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodological framework and Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual were applied to conduct the scoping review. The Population, Concept, and Context strategy (PCC) was used to develop the review questions, eligibility criteria, and research strategy, incorporating findings from both quantitative and qualitative research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Extension for Scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) was implemented. A scoping review search was conducted using four databases by specific key words for example: \"pregnant woman\" OR \"postnatal woman\" AND \"triage\" OR \"obstetric emergency service\" OR \"health facility\" AND \"delivery\" OR \"childbirth\" OR \"obstetric\" OR \"prenatal care\" OR \"parturition\" OR \"pregnancy\" OR \"maternal health services\" OR \"perinatal care\" OR \"postnatal care\". Further additional studies or references were culled from included primary studies to identify relevant studies that were missed in the initial search.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy generated an initial list of 622 studies of which 15 studies were included. The findings revealed that the implementation of obstetric triage can substantially reduce delays in getting care (delay 3) during birth. The barriers within the department which hindered the successful implementation of obstetric triage included shortages of staff and space, burnout and fatigue among health professionals, inadequate knowledge, resistance to change, lack of commitment and responsibility, unclear task descriptions, insufficient supplies, and deficient communications system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore that the effective implementation of triage was linked to reduced costs, such as decreased waiting times for women, across six countries. However, identified factors frequently hampered the successful implementation of obstetric triage during pregnancy and childbirth. Given that implementing obstetric triage can substantially reduce delays in getting care during pregnancy and childbirth, linked to reducing costs, and the identified barriers need to be addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20899,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-025-01982-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The assessment of a pregnant woman typically begins at obstetric triage, where healthcare providers evaluate whether life-altering decisions are necessary for the woman and her unborn baby. This scoping review aimed to assess the lack of comprehensive evaluation of across diverse settings of the evidence on the effectiveness, implementation, and barriers to the successful implementation of obstetric triage during pregnancy and childbirth.

Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley scoping review methodological framework and Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual were applied to conduct the scoping review. The Population, Concept, and Context strategy (PCC) was used to develop the review questions, eligibility criteria, and research strategy, incorporating findings from both quantitative and qualitative research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses: Extension for Scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) was implemented. A scoping review search was conducted using four databases by specific key words for example: "pregnant woman" OR "postnatal woman" AND "triage" OR "obstetric emergency service" OR "health facility" AND "delivery" OR "childbirth" OR "obstetric" OR "prenatal care" OR "parturition" OR "pregnancy" OR "maternal health services" OR "perinatal care" OR "postnatal care". Further additional studies or references were culled from included primary studies to identify relevant studies that were missed in the initial search.

Results: The search strategy generated an initial list of 622 studies of which 15 studies were included. The findings revealed that the implementation of obstetric triage can substantially reduce delays in getting care (delay 3) during birth. The barriers within the department which hindered the successful implementation of obstetric triage included shortages of staff and space, burnout and fatigue among health professionals, inadequate knowledge, resistance to change, lack of commitment and responsibility, unclear task descriptions, insufficient supplies, and deficient communications system.

Conclusion: Our findings underscore that the effective implementation of triage was linked to reduced costs, such as decreased waiting times for women, across six countries. However, identified factors frequently hampered the successful implementation of obstetric triage during pregnancy and childbirth. Given that implementing obstetric triage can substantially reduce delays in getting care during pregnancy and childbirth, linked to reducing costs, and the identified barriers need to be addressed.

产科分诊在减少等待时间方面的实施、有效性和障碍:范围审查。
背景:对孕妇的评估通常从产科分诊开始,医疗保健提供者评估改变生活的决定对妇女和未出生的婴儿是否必要。本综述旨在评估缺乏对妊娠和分娩期间成功实施产科分诊的有效性、实施和障碍的跨不同背景证据的综合评估。方法:应用Arksey和O' malley范围审查方法框架和Joanna Briggs研究所的审查者手册进行范围审查。使用人口、概念和背景策略(PCC)来制定审查问题、资格标准和研究策略,并结合定量和定性研究的结果。系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目:扩展范围评价(PRISMA-ScR)被实施。使用四个数据库按特定关键词进行了范围审查搜索,例如:“孕妇”或“产后妇女”与“分诊”或“产科急诊服务”或“卫生设施”与“分娩”或“分娩”或“产科”或“产前护理”或“分娩”或“怀孕”或“孕产妇保健服务”或“围产期护理”或“产后护理”。从纳入的主要研究中筛选更多的研究或参考文献,以确定在初始检索中遗漏的相关研究。结果:搜索策略生成了622项研究的初始列表,其中包括15项研究。调查结果显示,实施产科分诊可以大大减少分娩期间获得护理的延误(延误3)。部门内阻碍成功实施产科分诊的障碍包括人员和空间短缺、卫生专业人员的倦怠和疲劳、知识不足、抵制变革、缺乏承诺和责任、任务描述不明确、供应不足和通信系统不足。结论:我们的研究结果强调,在六个国家中,有效实施分诊与降低成本有关,例如减少妇女的等待时间。然而,已查明的因素往往阻碍了妊娠和分娩期间产科分诊的成功实施。鉴于实施产科分诊可以大大减少怀孕和分娩期间获得护理的延误,与降低成本有关,因此需要解决已确定的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
220
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Health focuses on all aspects of human reproduction. The journal includes sections dedicated to adolescent health, female fertility and midwifery and all content is open access. Reproductive health is defined as a state of physical, mental, and social well-being in all matters relating to the reproductive system, at all stages of life. Good reproductive health implies that people are able to have a satisfying and safe sex life, the capability to reproduce and the freedom to decide if, when, and how often to do so. Men and women should be informed about and have access to safe, effective, affordable, and acceptable methods of family planning of their choice, and the right to appropriate health-care services that enable women to safely go through pregnancy and childbirth.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信