The Experiences of Patients With Vanishing Twin Syndrome: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Patient Satisfaction and Miscarriage Information.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Nichole M Cubbage, Nicholas Embleton, Carly Levy
{"title":"The Experiences of Patients With Vanishing Twin Syndrome: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Patient Satisfaction and Miscarriage Information.","authors":"Nichole M Cubbage, Nicholas Embleton, Carly Levy","doi":"10.1017/thg.2025.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Vanishing twin syndrome is a miscarriage of multiples where one or more fetuses 'vanishes' (i.e., partial or full resorption or via calcification) during pregnancy, often before detection via ultrasound. It affects 30-50% of multifetal pregnancies, with most cases resulting in full resorption within the first trimester. Despite its recognition since 1945 and rising occurrence in both natural and assisted pregnancies, standardized clinical guidelines remain inadequate, leading to inconsistent diagnosis, counseling, and communication from healthcare providers. This study examines the experiences of mothers and gestational carriers diagnosed with VTS, focusing on patient-provider communication, risks, and symptom disclosure. A global online survey collected qualitative and quantitative data from 153 participants across 17 countries. Results show that most patients with formal diagnoses experienced negative interactions with healthcare providers, with an average sentiment score of -0.7 (on a scale from -2 to 2). Over 53.4% rated their communication experience as -1, and the average satisfaction score for the amount of information received was 3.5/10. Additionally, 43% of respondents were not informed about chorionicity, a key factor affecting fetal outcomes. Significant discrepancies in care were observed across different countries. The findings highlight major gaps in patient-provider communication and inconsistent clinical practices regarding VTS. Addressing these issues through improved education, clearer protocols, and standardized guidelines could enhance patient experiences and decision-making. Future research should focus on provider training and evidence-based strategies to improve the management of VTS and other types of miscarriage and death of multiples during pregnancy and postpartum.</p>","PeriodicalId":23446,"journal":{"name":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Twin Research and Human Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/thg.2025.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vanishing twin syndrome is a miscarriage of multiples where one or more fetuses 'vanishes' (i.e., partial or full resorption or via calcification) during pregnancy, often before detection via ultrasound. It affects 30-50% of multifetal pregnancies, with most cases resulting in full resorption within the first trimester. Despite its recognition since 1945 and rising occurrence in both natural and assisted pregnancies, standardized clinical guidelines remain inadequate, leading to inconsistent diagnosis, counseling, and communication from healthcare providers. This study examines the experiences of mothers and gestational carriers diagnosed with VTS, focusing on patient-provider communication, risks, and symptom disclosure. A global online survey collected qualitative and quantitative data from 153 participants across 17 countries. Results show that most patients with formal diagnoses experienced negative interactions with healthcare providers, with an average sentiment score of -0.7 (on a scale from -2 to 2). Over 53.4% rated their communication experience as -1, and the average satisfaction score for the amount of information received was 3.5/10. Additionally, 43% of respondents were not informed about chorionicity, a key factor affecting fetal outcomes. Significant discrepancies in care were observed across different countries. The findings highlight major gaps in patient-provider communication and inconsistent clinical practices regarding VTS. Addressing these issues through improved education, clearer protocols, and standardized guidelines could enhance patient experiences and decision-making. Future research should focus on provider training and evidence-based strategies to improve the management of VTS and other types of miscarriage and death of multiples during pregnancy and postpartum.

双胎消失综合征患者的经历:患者满意度和流产信息的混合方法探索。
消失双胞胎综合征是指妊娠期间一个或多个胎儿“消失”(即部分或全部吸收或通过钙化)的多胎流产,通常在超声检测之前发生。它影响30-50%的多胎妊娠,大多数病例在妊娠头三个月导致完全吸收。尽管自1945年以来人们就认识到这一点,并且自然妊娠和辅助妊娠的发生率都在上升,但标准化的临床指南仍然不足,导致医疗保健提供者的诊断、咨询和沟通不一致。本研究考察了被诊断为VTS的母亲和妊娠携带者的经历,重点关注患者与提供者的沟通、风险和症状披露。一项全球在线调查收集了来自17个国家153名参与者的定性和定量数据。结果显示,大多数正式诊断的患者与医疗服务提供者的互动都是负面的,平均情绪得分为-0.7(从-2到2)。超过53.4%的患者将他们的沟通体验评为-1,所收到的信息量的平均满意度得分为3.5/10。此外,43%的受访者没有被告知绒毛膜性,这是影响胎儿结局的关键因素。不同国家在护理方面存在显著差异。研究结果突出了关于VTS的患者与提供者沟通的主要差距和不一致的临床实践。通过改进教育、更清晰的协议和标准化的指导方针来解决这些问题,可以改善患者的体验和决策。未来的研究应侧重于提供者培训和循证战略,以改善VTS和其他类型的流产和多胎妊娠和产后死亡的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Twin Research and Human Genetics
Twin Research and Human Genetics 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Twin Research and Human Genetics is the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies. Twin Research and Human Genetics covers all areas of human genetics with an emphasis on twin studies, genetic epidemiology, psychiatric and behavioral genetics, and research on multiple births in the fields of epidemiology, genetics, endocrinology, fetal pathology, obstetrics and pediatrics. Through Twin Research and Human Genetics the society aims to publish the latest research developments in twin studies throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信