High-Accuracy Augmented Reality Guidance for Intracranial Drain Placement Using a Standalone Head-Worn Navigation System: First-in-Human Results.

IF 3.9 2区医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY

Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1227/neu.0000000000003401

Frederick Van Gestel, Taylor Frantz, Félix Buyck, Anthony G Gallagher, Wietse Geens, Quentin Neuville, Michael Bruneau, Bart Jansen, Thierry Scheerlinck, Jef Vandemeulebroucke, Johnny Duerinck

{"title":"High-Accuracy Augmented Reality Guidance for Intracranial Drain Placement Using a Standalone Head-Worn Navigation System: First-in-Human Results.","authors":"Frederick Van Gestel, Taylor Frantz, Félix Buyck, Anthony G Gallagher, Wietse Geens, Quentin Neuville, Michael Bruneau, Bart Jansen, Thierry Scheerlinck, Jef Vandemeulebroucke, Johnny Duerinck","doi":"10.1227/neu.0000000000003401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is often performed freehand, a technique subpar to accurate yet impractical image-guided methods, yielding optimal placement in only 70%. The aim of this study was to address shortcomings in EVD placement and image guidance technologies by implementing high-accuracy augmented reality (AR) guidance.Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical pilot study to assess feasibility, safety, and clinical performance of EVD placement using a standalone AR headset equipped with high-accuracy inside-out infrared tracking and software addressing EVD placement. Placement quality was reported using a newly defined extended modified Kakarla scale, and dichotomized into clinically relevant outcome parameters. Results were compared with a nonconcurrent freehand control group using one-sided Fisher exact tests.Results: Eleven AR-guided EVD placements were performed, achieving functional placement in all cases on the first attempt, vs 7 (64%) in the control group (P = .045); successful placement in 9 (82%) vs 5 (45%); optimal in 8 (73%) vs 3 (27%) (P = .043); suboptimal in 2 (18%) vs 5 (45%); and failed in 0 vs 1 (9%). No AR-guided placements required revision, whereas the freehand group had a 36% reintervention rate (P = .045). Procedure-related complications occurred in 2 AR-guided cases (18%), vs 5 (45%) freehand (all post-reintervention).Conclusion: This study presents the first clinical use case of EVD placement using high-accuracy AR guidance contained in a standalone head-worn navigation system. Safe and reliable outcomes using a validated pipeline were demonstrated, eliminating stick-and-poke attempts and resulting in improved quality, increased single attempt success rates, and reduced revision and complication rates. Based on these results, a multicenter randomized controlled trial will be initiated.","PeriodicalId":19276,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000003401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: External ventricular drain (EVD) placement is often performed freehand, a technique subpar to accurate yet impractical image-guided methods, yielding optimal placement in only 70%. The aim of this study was to address shortcomings in EVD placement and image guidance technologies by implementing high-accuracy augmented reality (AR) guidance.

Methods: We conducted a prospective clinical pilot study to assess feasibility, safety, and clinical performance of EVD placement using a standalone AR headset equipped with high-accuracy inside-out infrared tracking and software addressing EVD placement. Placement quality was reported using a newly defined extended modified Kakarla scale, and dichotomized into clinically relevant outcome parameters. Results were compared with a nonconcurrent freehand control group using one-sided Fisher exact tests.

Results: Eleven AR-guided EVD placements were performed, achieving functional placement in all cases on the first attempt, vs 7 (64%) in the control group (P = .045); successful placement in 9 (82%) vs 5 (45%); optimal in 8 (73%) vs 3 (27%) (P = .043); suboptimal in 2 (18%) vs 5 (45%); and failed in 0 vs 1 (9%). No AR-guided placements required revision, whereas the freehand group had a 36% reintervention rate (P = .045). Procedure-related complications occurred in 2 AR-guided cases (18%), vs 5 (45%) freehand (all post-reintervention).

Conclusion: This study presents the first clinical use case of EVD placement using high-accuracy AR guidance contained in a standalone head-worn navigation system. Safe and reliable outcomes using a validated pipeline were demonstrated, eliminating stick-and-poke attempts and resulting in improved quality, increased single attempt success rates, and reduced revision and complication rates. Based on these results, a multicenter randomized controlled trial will be initiated.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学

CiteScore

8.20

自引率

6.20%

发文量

898

审稿时长

2-4 weeks

期刊介绍： Neurosurgery, the official journal of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, publishes research on clinical and experimental neurosurgery covering the very latest developments in science, technology, and medicine. For professionals aware of the rapid pace of developments in the field, this journal is nothing short of indispensable as the most complete window on the contemporary field of neurosurgery. Neurosurgery is the fastest-growing journal in the field, with a worldwide reputation for reliable coverage delivered with a fresh and dynamic outlook.