Morphometric disparities in skull size and shape of capuchin monkeys (Cebidae: Cebus) in northern South America and Central America.

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Sebastián García-Restrepo, Andrés Link, Jessica W Lynch
{"title":"Morphometric disparities in skull size and shape of capuchin monkeys (Cebidae: Cebus) in northern South America and Central America.","authors":"Sebastián García-Restrepo, Andrés Link, Jessica W Lynch","doi":"10.1007/s10329-025-01188-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Taxonomic classifications of the gracile capuchin monkeys, Cebus, have traditionally been based on cranio-dental and pelage characters. Advances in molecular biology have provided information on the evolutionary history of the genus but the taxonomy and distribution limits of taxa in the northern Andes are still under debate. To assess morphometric disparities and compare the results with hypotheses based on genetic evidence for Cebus taxonomy, we used 2D geometric morphometrics on 206 adult specimens (127 males, 77 females, 2 unsexed) belonging to 12 taxa by assigning Type I landmarks in the frontal (11), lateral (18) and ventral (16) views of the skull, and 14 in the mandible. Our results show that skull shape is more variable than centroid size and that morphometric disparities exist across and within all three geographic groups (Central America, Andes, and Amazon). Although skull shape in Cebus tends to vary slightly, our results suggest differences among some taxa and highlight the utility of studying shape in addition to methods that have focused on size. Some results concur with the taxonomic classifications based on molecular evidence but it is important to note that Cebus species are wide-ranging with high inter- and intraspecific phenotypic variability in diverse ecological conditions. This makes it difficult to provide species diagnoses based just on morphometric or morphological characters and suggests the need to integrate different sources of evidence to resolve uncertainties about the taxonomy and the evolutionary relationships in the genus.</p>","PeriodicalId":20468,"journal":{"name":"Primates","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primates","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10329-025-01188-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxonomic classifications of the gracile capuchin monkeys, Cebus, have traditionally been based on cranio-dental and pelage characters. Advances in molecular biology have provided information on the evolutionary history of the genus but the taxonomy and distribution limits of taxa in the northern Andes are still under debate. To assess morphometric disparities and compare the results with hypotheses based on genetic evidence for Cebus taxonomy, we used 2D geometric morphometrics on 206 adult specimens (127 males, 77 females, 2 unsexed) belonging to 12 taxa by assigning Type I landmarks in the frontal (11), lateral (18) and ventral (16) views of the skull, and 14 in the mandible. Our results show that skull shape is more variable than centroid size and that morphometric disparities exist across and within all three geographic groups (Central America, Andes, and Amazon). Although skull shape in Cebus tends to vary slightly, our results suggest differences among some taxa and highlight the utility of studying shape in addition to methods that have focused on size. Some results concur with the taxonomic classifications based on molecular evidence but it is important to note that Cebus species are wide-ranging with high inter- and intraspecific phenotypic variability in diverse ecological conditions. This makes it difficult to provide species diagnoses based just on morphometric or morphological characters and suggests the need to integrate different sources of evidence to resolve uncertainties about the taxonomy and the evolutionary relationships in the genus.

南美洲北部和中美洲卷尾猴(卷尾猴科:卷尾猴)颅骨大小和形状的形态学差异。
纤巧的卷尾猴(Cebus)的分类传统上是基于颅牙和皮毛的特征。分子生物学的进展为该属的进化历史提供了信息,但在安第斯山脉北部分类群的分类和分布界限仍存在争议。为了评估形态学差异,并将结果与基于遗传证据的Cebus分类学假设进行比较,我们对属于12个分类群的206个成年标本(127个雄性,77个雌性,2个无性别)进行了二维几何形态学测量,并在颅骨的正面(11)、侧面(18)和腹侧(16)视图和下颌骨的14个视图中分配了I型标志。我们的研究结果表明,头骨形状比质心大小变化更大,并且形态测量差异存在于所有三个地理群体(中美洲、安第斯山脉和亚马逊)之间。虽然Cebus的头骨形状往往略有不同,但我们的结果表明一些分类群之间存在差异,并突出了除了研究大小的方法之外研究形状的效用。部分结果与基于分子证据的分类学分类一致,但值得注意的是,在不同的生态条件下,Cebus种分布广泛,种间和种内表型变异性高。这使得仅根据形态特征或形态特征提供物种诊断变得困难,并表明需要整合不同来源的证据来解决属中分类和进化关系的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primates
Primates 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Primates is an international journal of primatology whose aim is to provide a forum for the elucidation of all aspects of primates. The oldest primatological journal, Primates publishes original papers that advance the scientific study of primates, and its scope embraces work in diverse fields covering biological bases of behavior, socio-ecology, learning and cognition, social processes, systematics, evolution, and medicine. Contributions relevant to conservation of natural populations and welfare of captive primates are welcome. Studies focusing on nonprimate species may be considered if their relevance to primatology is clear. Original Articles as well as Review Articles, News and Perspectives, and Book Reviews are included. All manuscripts received are initially screened for suitability by members of the Editorial Board, taking into account style and ethical issues, leading to a swift decision about whether to send the manuscript for external review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信