Ibrahim Serag, Mohamed Abouzid, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Jaber H Jaradat, Mohamed Hendawy, Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Judy Ahmed Abdullah, Mona Mahmoud Elsakka, Muneeb Ahmad Muneer, Marwa Aboelhassan Elnagar, Mohamed Adel Fakher, Aya J Elkenani, Abdallah Abbas
{"title":"Vaccines for Alzheimer's disease: a brief scoping review.","authors":"Ibrahim Serag, Mohamed Abouzid, Mostafa Hossam El Din Moawad, Jaber H Jaradat, Mohamed Hendawy, Nada Ibrahim Hendi, Ibraheem M Alkhawaldeh, Judy Ahmed Abdullah, Mona Mahmoud Elsakka, Muneeb Ahmad Muneer, Marwa Aboelhassan Elnagar, Mohamed Adel Fakher, Aya J Elkenani, Abdallah Abbas","doi":"10.1007/s10072-025-08073-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia among older adults. Existing treatments-such as cholinesterase inhibitors, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, and monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid beta-can improve functional and neuropsychiatric outcomes but fail to prevent disease onset, halt progression, or adequately reduce amyloid-beta burden. Consequently, research efforts have shifted to primary prevention through immunization, although the efficacy of these strategies remains uncertain. This review explores the efficacy, safety, and adverse events of current immunotherapies for AD and discusses future research and clinical implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SR) checklist. A systematic search was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 145 studies were included. Preclinical research often employed transgenic mouse models to investigate AD pathology and vaccine benefits, while Phase I and II clinical trials centered on safety and preliminary efficacy in humans. Most studies were conducted in the USA, China, and Japan, highlighting these countries' strong clinical trial infrastructure. Vaccination frequently reduced amyloid-beta or tau pathology in preclinical settings, although cognitive outcomes were inconsistent. Clinical trials primarily focused on safety and immune response, with newer vaccines such as ABvac40 demonstrating encouraging results and minimal adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although AD vaccines show promise in preclinical settings, longer and more comprehensive clinical trials are necessary to determine their long-term efficacy and safety. Standardized protocols and efforts to reduce regional disparities in research would facilitate better comparability and generalizability of findings, thereby guiding the future development of effective immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":19191,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-025-08073-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder and the most common cause of dementia among older adults. Existing treatments-such as cholinesterase inhibitors, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, and monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid beta-can improve functional and neuropsychiatric outcomes but fail to prevent disease onset, halt progression, or adequately reduce amyloid-beta burden. Consequently, research efforts have shifted to primary prevention through immunization, although the efficacy of these strategies remains uncertain. This review explores the efficacy, safety, and adverse events of current immunotherapies for AD and discusses future research and clinical implications.
Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-SR) checklist. A systematic search was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Results: A total of 145 studies were included. Preclinical research often employed transgenic mouse models to investigate AD pathology and vaccine benefits, while Phase I and II clinical trials centered on safety and preliminary efficacy in humans. Most studies were conducted in the USA, China, and Japan, highlighting these countries' strong clinical trial infrastructure. Vaccination frequently reduced amyloid-beta or tau pathology in preclinical settings, although cognitive outcomes were inconsistent. Clinical trials primarily focused on safety and immune response, with newer vaccines such as ABvac40 demonstrating encouraging results and minimal adverse events.
Conclusion: Although AD vaccines show promise in preclinical settings, longer and more comprehensive clinical trials are necessary to determine their long-term efficacy and safety. Standardized protocols and efforts to reduce regional disparities in research would facilitate better comparability and generalizability of findings, thereby guiding the future development of effective immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease.
期刊介绍:
Neurological Sciences is intended to provide a medium for the communication of results and ideas in the field of neuroscience. The journal welcomes contributions in both the basic and clinical aspects of the neurosciences. The official language of the journal is English. Reports are published in the form of original articles, short communications, editorials, reviews and letters to the editor. Original articles present the results of experimental or clinical studies in the neurosciences, while short communications are succinct reports permitting the rapid publication of novel results. Original contributions may be submitted for the special sections History of Neurology, Health Care and Neurological Digressions - a forum for cultural topics related to the neurosciences. The journal also publishes correspondence book reviews, meeting reports and announcements.