Comparison of brain volume increase in patients with intracranial hypertension after decompressive craniectomy and expansion craniotomy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Luigi Valentino Berra, Andres Rubiano, Guido Cedrone, Mattia Capobianco, Andrea Bassani, Antonio Santoro
{"title":"Comparison of brain volume increase in patients with intracranial hypertension after decompressive craniectomy and expansion craniotomy.","authors":"Luigi Valentino Berra, Andres Rubiano, Guido Cedrone, Mattia Capobianco, Andrea Bassani, Antonio Santoro","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03440-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intracranial hypertension is a critical condition often resulting from traumatic brain injury or malignant middle cerebral artery ischemia, necessitating surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. This study compares the efficacy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and expansion craniotomy (EC) in managing cerebral edema. Sixty-three patients, 52 undergoing DC and 11 undergoing EC, were evaluated for changes in brain volume, midline shift, and other key parameters using pre- and post-operative CT scans. Results indicated that brain volume increased significantly more in the EC group (100 ± 51 cm³) compared to the DC group (72 ± 51 cm³, p < 0.05). Both techniques effectively reduced midline displacement, but EC showed a superior capacity for brain expansion. The findings suggest that EC, which raises the cranial operculum to reduce soft tissue tension and provide hemostatic effects, may offer advantages over DC by allowing greater decompression and reducing the risk of complications such as epidural hematomas. These results support the potential of EC as a promising alternative to DC for treating intracranial hypertension. Future research should investigate long-term outcomes to further validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03440-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intracranial hypertension is a critical condition often resulting from traumatic brain injury or malignant middle cerebral artery ischemia, necessitating surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. This study compares the efficacy of decompressive craniectomy (DC) and expansion craniotomy (EC) in managing cerebral edema. Sixty-three patients, 52 undergoing DC and 11 undergoing EC, were evaluated for changes in brain volume, midline shift, and other key parameters using pre- and post-operative CT scans. Results indicated that brain volume increased significantly more in the EC group (100 ± 51 cm³) compared to the DC group (72 ± 51 cm³, p < 0.05). Both techniques effectively reduced midline displacement, but EC showed a superior capacity for brain expansion. The findings suggest that EC, which raises the cranial operculum to reduce soft tissue tension and provide hemostatic effects, may offer advantages over DC by allowing greater decompression and reducing the risk of complications such as epidural hematomas. These results support the potential of EC as a promising alternative to DC for treating intracranial hypertension. Future research should investigate long-term outcomes to further validate these findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信