Collaborative recall changes the global organization of memory: A representational similarity analysis of social influences on individual and collective memory organization.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Jingwen Jin, Hae-Yoon Choi, Garrett D Greeley, Nicholas W Pepe, Elizabeth A Kensinger, Aprajita Mohanty, Suparna Rajaram
{"title":"Collaborative recall changes the global organization of memory: A representational similarity analysis of social influences on individual and collective memory organization.","authors":"Jingwen Jin, Hae-Yoon Choi, Garrett D Greeley, Nicholas W Pepe, Elizabeth A Kensinger, Aprajita Mohanty, Suparna Rajaram","doi":"10.1037/xge0001698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The last 25 years of research have revealed that recalling the past with others changes memory. A key finding is that former group members show increased memory overlap or collective memory. Beyond memory content, we ask whether collaborative recall changes the organization of memory. How we organize information has far-reaching consequences on learning and remembering, and research has produced sophisticated theories and measures of memory organization when people recall alone. However, research remains sparse on how social influences shape memory organization. Furthermore, studies document local changes only (small segments in recall), raising the question whether collaboration produces global changes (positional relations among all items) in memory organization that can inform how people construct memory narratives. It is also unclear whether collaboration affects memory organization differently for different emotional contents despite the well-established influence of emotion on memory. We address these questions by focusing on two important advances. Using representational similarity analysis, we seek a deeper understanding of collaborative recall on memory organization at the global level and how emotional valence influences memory organization. Comparing two collaborative recall sequences, collaborative-collaborative-individual and individual-collaborative-individual, with individual-individual-individual (baseline sequence), we replicated better memory for emotional than neutral content and collective memory for content. Novel to our aims, collaborative recall changed global memory organization, both at individual and collective levels and for neutral and emotional contents. These quantitative indices for holistic changes in memory organization reveal the depth of social influences in reshaping memory, with implications for remembering, beliefs, education, and national narratives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":15698,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: General","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001698","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The last 25 years of research have revealed that recalling the past with others changes memory. A key finding is that former group members show increased memory overlap or collective memory. Beyond memory content, we ask whether collaborative recall changes the organization of memory. How we organize information has far-reaching consequences on learning and remembering, and research has produced sophisticated theories and measures of memory organization when people recall alone. However, research remains sparse on how social influences shape memory organization. Furthermore, studies document local changes only (small segments in recall), raising the question whether collaboration produces global changes (positional relations among all items) in memory organization that can inform how people construct memory narratives. It is also unclear whether collaboration affects memory organization differently for different emotional contents despite the well-established influence of emotion on memory. We address these questions by focusing on two important advances. Using representational similarity analysis, we seek a deeper understanding of collaborative recall on memory organization at the global level and how emotional valence influences memory organization. Comparing two collaborative recall sequences, collaborative-collaborative-individual and individual-collaborative-individual, with individual-individual-individual (baseline sequence), we replicated better memory for emotional than neutral content and collective memory for content. Novel to our aims, collaborative recall changed global memory organization, both at individual and collective levels and for neutral and emotional contents. These quantitative indices for holistic changes in memory organization reveal the depth of social influences in reshaping memory, with implications for remembering, beliefs, education, and national narratives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

协同回忆改变记忆的整体组织:社会对个人和集体记忆组织影响的表征相似性分析。
过去25年的研究表明,与他人一起回忆过去会改变记忆。一个重要的发现是,前小组成员表现出更多的记忆重叠或集体记忆。除了记忆内容,我们还探讨了协同回忆是否会改变记忆的组织。我们如何组织信息对学习和记忆有着深远的影响,研究已经产生了复杂的理论和衡量人们单独回忆时记忆组织的方法。然而,关于社会影响如何塑造记忆组织的研究仍然很少。此外,研究只记录了局部变化(回忆中的小片段),这就提出了一个问题,即合作是否会在记忆组织中产生全局变化(所有项目之间的位置关系),从而告诉人们如何构建记忆叙事。尽管情绪对记忆的影响已被证实,但合作对不同情绪内容的记忆组织是否有不同的影响尚不清楚。我们通过关注两个重要进展来解决这些问题。通过表征相似性分析,我们寻求在整体层面上对协作回忆对记忆组织的影响以及情绪效价对记忆组织的影响有更深入的了解。比较两种协作记忆序列,即协作-协作-个体和个体-协作-个体,以及个体-个体-个体(基线序列),我们复制了情绪性记忆优于中性内容的记忆和内容的集体记忆。与我们的目标不同,协作回忆改变了个人和集体层面以及中性和情感内容的全球记忆组织。这些记忆组织整体变化的量化指标揭示了重塑记忆的社会影响的深度,对记忆、信仰、教育和国家叙事都有影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: General publishes articles describing empirical work that bridges the traditional interests of two or more communities of psychology. The work may touch on issues dealt with in JEP: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, JEP: Human Perception and Performance, JEP: Animal Behavior Processes, or JEP: Applied, but may also concern issues in other subdisciplines of psychology, including social processes, developmental processes, psychopathology, neuroscience, or computational modeling. Articles in JEP: General may be longer than the usual journal publication if necessary, but shorter articles that bridge subdisciplines will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信