Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise?

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ria Resti Fauziah , Ari Metalin Ika Puspita , Ivo Yuliana , Fiena Saadatul Ummah , Siti Mufarochah , Erfan Ramadhani
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise?","authors":"Ria Resti Fauziah ,&nbsp;Ari Metalin Ika Puspita ,&nbsp;Ivo Yuliana ,&nbsp;Fiena Saadatul Ummah ,&nbsp;Siti Mufarochah ,&nbsp;Erfan Ramadhani","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This letter discusses findings from a recent study comparing AI-generated and humanwritten neurosurgery articles. The study reveals that AI-generated articles exhibit higher readability scores (Lix: 35 vs. 26, Flesch-Kincaid: 10 vs. 8) but may lack depth in analysis. Evaluators could correctly identify AI authorship with 61 % accuracy, and preferences were nearly even between AI-generated (47 %) and human-written (44 %) articles. While AI improves accessibility and efficiency in academic writing, its limitations in clinical experience, originality, and nuanced analysis highlight the need for human oversight. The integration of AI should be as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for human expertise. Future research should focus on refining AI’s analytical capabilities and ensuring ethical use in scientific publishing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 111193"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825001651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter discusses findings from a recent study comparing AI-generated and humanwritten neurosurgery articles. The study reveals that AI-generated articles exhibit higher readability scores (Lix: 35 vs. 26, Flesch-Kincaid: 10 vs. 8) but may lack depth in analysis. Evaluators could correctly identify AI authorship with 61 % accuracy, and preferences were nearly even between AI-generated (47 %) and human-written (44 %) articles. While AI improves accessibility and efficiency in academic writing, its limitations in clinical experience, originality, and nuanced analysis highlight the need for human oversight. The integration of AI should be as a complementary tool rather than a replacement for human expertise. Future research should focus on refining AI’s analytical capabilities and ensuring ethical use in scientific publishing.
学术写作中的人工智能:增强还是取代人类专业知识?
这封信讨论了最近一项比较人工智能生成和人类撰写的神经外科文章的研究结果。该研究表明,人工智能生成的文章具有更高的可读性得分(Lix: 35比26,Flesch-Kincaid: 10比8),但可能缺乏深度分析。评估人员正确识别人工智能作者的准确率为61%,人工智能生成(47%)和人工撰写(44%)的文章之间的偏好几乎相等。虽然人工智能提高了学术写作的可访问性和效率,但它在临床经验、独创性和细致分析方面的局限性突出了人类监督的必要性。人工智能的整合应该作为一种补充工具,而不是替代人类的专业知识。未来的研究应侧重于完善人工智能的分析能力,并确保科学出版中的伦理使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信