Sex-specific radiation-associated lung cancer mortality risks as impacted by smoking among US radiologic technologists.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cato M Milder, Elizabeth K Cahoon, Sara J Schonfeld, Dale L Preston, Bruce H Alexander, Martha S Linet, Cari M Kitahara
{"title":"Sex-specific radiation-associated lung cancer mortality risks as impacted by smoking among US radiologic technologists.","authors":"Cato M Milder, Elizabeth K Cahoon, Sara J Schonfeld, Dale L Preston, Bruce H Alexander, Martha S Linet, Cari M Kitahara","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Life Span Study of Japanese atomic bomb survivors estimated greater risks of radiation-associated lung cancer among females than males, with direct implications for occupational radiation safety policy. To evaluate replicability of these findings in radiation workers, we assessed sex-specific radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality in a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from four questionnaires (1983-2013), we reconstructed lifetime smoking history for 83,715 female and 26,650 male technologists. We estimated individual lung occupational radiation doses using badge dose and questionnaire data. We used Poisson regression to investigate joint radiation-smoking effects on sex-averaged and sex-specific lung cancer mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 1243 female and 607 male technologists who died from lung cancer, median cumulative lung dose was 16.2mGy (non-cases: 7.7mGy) and 24.5mGy (non-cases: 10.1mGy), respectively. Excess risk of lung cancer increased with increasing radiation dose. However, smoking modified this effect: the radiation effect at 100mGy increased until 16 cigarettes/day, after which it declined. Excess relative risk (ERR) per 100mGy was greater among males (never smoking additive ERR = 1.98; 95%CI = 0.34, 6.25) than females (never smoking additive ERR = 0.40; 95%CI=-0.02, 1.21); sex-differences persisted up to ∼40 cigarettes/day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality were stronger in males than females, in contrast to the Life Span Study. However, both studies found radiation-associated risks were highest in workers with light-to-moderate smoking intensity. Altogether, these findings reinforce the importance of rigorous radiation protection measures for all radiation workers, regardless of sex, alongside interventions to support smoking cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Life Span Study of Japanese atomic bomb survivors estimated greater risks of radiation-associated lung cancer among females than males, with direct implications for occupational radiation safety policy. To evaluate replicability of these findings in radiation workers, we assessed sex-specific radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality in a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.

Methods: Using data from four questionnaires (1983-2013), we reconstructed lifetime smoking history for 83,715 female and 26,650 male technologists. We estimated individual lung occupational radiation doses using badge dose and questionnaire data. We used Poisson regression to investigate joint radiation-smoking effects on sex-averaged and sex-specific lung cancer mortality risk.

Results: For 1243 female and 607 male technologists who died from lung cancer, median cumulative lung dose was 16.2mGy (non-cases: 7.7mGy) and 24.5mGy (non-cases: 10.1mGy), respectively. Excess risk of lung cancer increased with increasing radiation dose. However, smoking modified this effect: the radiation effect at 100mGy increased until 16 cigarettes/day, after which it declined. Excess relative risk (ERR) per 100mGy was greater among males (never smoking additive ERR = 1.98; 95%CI = 0.34, 6.25) than females (never smoking additive ERR = 0.40; 95%CI=-0.02, 1.21); sex-differences persisted up to ∼40 cigarettes/day.

Conclusions: Our results indicated radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality were stronger in males than females, in contrast to the Life Span Study. However, both studies found radiation-associated risks were highest in workers with light-to-moderate smoking intensity. Altogether, these findings reinforce the importance of rigorous radiation protection measures for all radiation workers, regardless of sex, alongside interventions to support smoking cessation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信