Sex-specific radiation-associated lung cancer mortality risks as impacted by smoking among US radiologic technologists.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cato M Milder, Elizabeth K Cahoon, Sara J Schonfeld, Dale L Preston, Bruce H Alexander, Martha S Linet, Cari M Kitahara
{"title":"Sex-specific radiation-associated lung cancer mortality risks as impacted by smoking among US radiologic technologists.","authors":"Cato M Milder, Elizabeth K Cahoon, Sara J Schonfeld, Dale L Preston, Bruce H Alexander, Martha S Linet, Cari M Kitahara","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Life Span Study of Japanese atomic bomb survivors estimated greater risks of radiation-associated lung cancer among females than males, with direct implications for occupational radiation safety policy. To evaluate replicability of these findings in radiation workers, we assessed sex-specific radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality in a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from four questionnaires (1983-2013), we reconstructed lifetime smoking history for 83,715 female and 26,650 male technologists. We estimated individual lung occupational radiation doses using badge dose and questionnaire data. We used Poisson regression to investigate joint radiation-smoking effects on sex-averaged and sex-specific lung cancer mortality risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 1243 female and 607 male technologists who died from lung cancer, median cumulative lung dose was 16.2mGy (non-cases: 7.7mGy) and 24.5mGy (non-cases: 10.1mGy), respectively. Excess risk of lung cancer increased with increasing radiation dose. However, smoking modified this effect: the radiation effect at 100mGy increased until 16 cigarettes/day, after which it declined. Excess relative risk (ERR) per 100mGy was greater among males (never smoking additive ERR = 1.98; 95%CI = 0.34, 6.25) than females (never smoking additive ERR = 0.40; 95%CI=-0.02, 1.21); sex-differences persisted up to ∼40 cigarettes/day.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality were stronger in males than females, in contrast to the Life Span Study. However, both studies found radiation-associated risks were highest in workers with light-to-moderate smoking intensity. Altogether, these findings reinforce the importance of rigorous radiation protection measures for all radiation workers, regardless of sex, alongside interventions to support smoking cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Life Span Study of Japanese atomic bomb survivors estimated greater risks of radiation-associated lung cancer among females than males, with direct implications for occupational radiation safety policy. To evaluate replicability of these findings in radiation workers, we assessed sex-specific radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality in a large cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists.

Methods: Using data from four questionnaires (1983-2013), we reconstructed lifetime smoking history for 83,715 female and 26,650 male technologists. We estimated individual lung occupational radiation doses using badge dose and questionnaire data. We used Poisson regression to investigate joint radiation-smoking effects on sex-averaged and sex-specific lung cancer mortality risk.

Results: For 1243 female and 607 male technologists who died from lung cancer, median cumulative lung dose was 16.2mGy (non-cases: 7.7mGy) and 24.5mGy (non-cases: 10.1mGy), respectively. Excess risk of lung cancer increased with increasing radiation dose. However, smoking modified this effect: the radiation effect at 100mGy increased until 16 cigarettes/day, after which it declined. Excess relative risk (ERR) per 100mGy was greater among males (never smoking additive ERR = 1.98; 95%CI = 0.34, 6.25) than females (never smoking additive ERR = 0.40; 95%CI=-0.02, 1.21); sex-differences persisted up to ∼40 cigarettes/day.

Conclusions: Our results indicated radiation-associated risks of lung cancer mortality were stronger in males than females, in contrast to the Life Span Study. However, both studies found radiation-associated risks were highest in workers with light-to-moderate smoking intensity. Altogether, these findings reinforce the importance of rigorous radiation protection measures for all radiation workers, regardless of sex, alongside interventions to support smoking cessation.

美国放射技师吸烟对性别特异性辐射相关肺癌死亡风险的影响
背景:对日本原子弹幸存者的寿命研究估计,女性患辐射相关肺癌的风险高于男性,这对职业辐射安全政策具有直接影响。为了评估这些发现在放射工作人员中的可重复性,我们在一大批美国放射技术人员中评估了性别特异性辐射相关的肺癌死亡率风险。方法:利用1983-2013年4份问卷的数据,重建83715名女性和26650名男性技术人员的终生吸烟史。我们使用胸牌剂量和问卷数据估计个体肺部职业辐射剂量。我们使用泊松回归来研究辐射吸烟对性别平均和性别特异性肺癌死亡风险的联合影响。结果:死于肺癌的1243名女性技师和607名男性技师中,肺累积剂量中位数分别为16.2mGy(非病例:7.7mGy)和24.5mGy(非病例:10.1mGy)。肺癌的过度风险随着辐射剂量的增加而增加。然而,吸烟改变了这种效应:100mGy的辐射效应增加到16支/天,之后下降。每100mGy的过量相对危险度(ERR)在男性中更高(从不吸烟的累加性ERR = 1.98;95%CI = 0.34, 6.25)高于女性(从不吸烟的添加剂ERR = 0.40;95% ci = -0.02, 1.21);性别差异持续到40支/天。结论:我们的研究结果表明,与寿命研究相反,辐射相关的肺癌死亡风险在男性中强于女性。然而,两项研究都发现,与辐射相关的风险在轻度至中度吸烟强度的工人中最高。总之,这些发现强调了对所有辐射工作人员采取严格辐射防护措施的重要性,无论性别,以及支持戒烟的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信