Biological sex differences in fatigue in resistance-trained individuals: A scoping review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Christian Houmann Amdi, Jackson Fyfe, SangHoon Yoon, Greg Nuckols, Martin Refalo
{"title":"Biological sex differences in fatigue in resistance-trained individuals: A scoping review.","authors":"Christian Houmann Amdi, Jackson Fyfe, SangHoon Yoon, Greg Nuckols, Martin Refalo","doi":"10.1055/a-2563-9449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Females may experience less neuromuscular fatigue and improved recovery following resistance training than males, however, it is unclear whether this applies to resistance-trained individuals. A systematic scoping review was performed to map the evidence on sex differences in fatigue during and following resistance training in trained participants. PubMed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered. 4020 identified articles, 34 were included. These studies assessed sex differences in fatigue using various measures during single and multiple RT sets, performance relative to baseline at various time points (0-5 min, 1-6 h, 24 h, and 48-96 h after RT), and metabolic responses. Substantial heterogeneity in study design and results were observed. Together, most studies found minor-to-no sex differences in neuromuscular fatigue, but some evidence of greater fatigability in males during or immediately following RT were found when i) more complex free-weight exercises were performed with moderate loads, ii) rest periods were shorter, and iii) males were substantially stronger than females in relative terms, among others. Future investigations should explore the impact of training variables and habitual training on fatigue in males and females of comparable relative strength and technical proficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2563-9449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Females may experience less neuromuscular fatigue and improved recovery following resistance training than males, however, it is unclear whether this applies to resistance-trained individuals. A systematic scoping review was performed to map the evidence on sex differences in fatigue during and following resistance training in trained participants. PubMed, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus were searched following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. The protocol was prospectively registered. 4020 identified articles, 34 were included. These studies assessed sex differences in fatigue using various measures during single and multiple RT sets, performance relative to baseline at various time points (0-5 min, 1-6 h, 24 h, and 48-96 h after RT), and metabolic responses. Substantial heterogeneity in study design and results were observed. Together, most studies found minor-to-no sex differences in neuromuscular fatigue, but some evidence of greater fatigability in males during or immediately following RT were found when i) more complex free-weight exercises were performed with moderate loads, ii) rest periods were shorter, and iii) males were substantially stronger than females in relative terms, among others. Future investigations should explore the impact of training variables and habitual training on fatigue in males and females of comparable relative strength and technical proficiency.

抗阻训练个体疲劳的生理性别差异:范围综述。
与男性相比,女性在抗阻训练后可能会经历更少的神经肌肉疲劳和更好的恢复,然而,尚不清楚这是否适用于抗阻训练的个体。进行了系统的范围审查,以绘制在训练参与者的阻力训练期间和之后疲劳的性别差异的证据。PubMed, CINAHL和SPORTDiscus按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行检索。该方案被前瞻性注册。4020件鉴定物品,包括34件。这些研究通过在单次和多次放疗期间使用各种测量方法评估疲劳的性别差异,在不同时间点(放疗后0-5分钟、1-6小时、24小时和48-96小时)相对于基线的表现,以及代谢反应。在研究设计和结果中观察到大量的异质性。总的来说,大多数研究发现神经肌肉疲劳的性别差异很小,甚至没有差异,但一些证据表明,男性在RT期间或之后更容易疲劳,当i)更复杂的自由重量运动在中等负荷下进行,ii)休息时间更短,iii)相对而言,男性比女性强壮得多,等等。未来的调查应探讨训练变量和习惯训练对相对力量和技术熟练程度可比性的男性和女性的疲劳的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信