Enhanced glomerular thrombosis in pronated animals with ARDS.

IF 2.8 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Silvia Marchesi, Elin Lundström, Elin Lindström, Jonas Ödmark, Mark Lubberink, Håkan Ahlström, Miklós Lipcsey
{"title":"Enhanced glomerular thrombosis in pronated animals with ARDS.","authors":"Silvia Marchesi, Elin Lundström, Elin Lindström, Jonas Ödmark, Mark Lubberink, Håkan Ahlström, Miklós Lipcsey","doi":"10.1186/s40635-025-00747-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prone positioning is part of the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has been demonstrated to successfully improve the ventilation-perfusion match and reduce mortality in patients with severe respiratory failure. However, the effect of pronation on other organs than the lungs has not been widely studied. This study aimed to compare abdominal edema, perfusion and inflammation in supine and prone positioning in a porcine ARDS model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen piglets were randomized into two groups: a supine group (n = 9) and a prone group (n = 8). Both groups received endotoxemic infusion and were observed for 6 h. Three animals per group underwent positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI) for imaging acquisition. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recorded throughout the protocol. Inflammation was assessed by measuring cytokine concentrations in blood, ascites and the abdominal organs' tissue. The edema in abdominal organs was assessed by wet-dry ratio and pathophysiological analysis of tissue samples and by MRI and PET measurements from volumes of interest (VOIs) delineated in abdominal organ in MRI and PET images. The abdominal organs' perfusion was also assessed by MRI and PET measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prone group had a faster CO<sub>2</sub> washout and needed a lower positive end-expiratory pressure to maintain the desired oxygenation. In the prone group duodenal edema was lower (measured with wet-dry ratio) and renal perfusion, by both MRI and PET measurements, was lower than half compared to the supine group (MRI, perfusion fraction, f: supine group 0.13; prone group 0.03; p-value 0.002. PET Flow: supine group 1.7; prone group 0.4 ml/cm<sup>3</sup>/min; p-value 0.002). In addition, the histopathological samples of the kidneys showed a higher incidence and extent of glomerular thrombosis in the prone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a porcine ARDS model, prone positioning was associated with enhanced glomerular thrombosis and low renal perfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":13750,"journal":{"name":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","volume":"13 1","pages":"36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926287/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive Care Medicine Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40635-025-00747-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prone positioning is part of the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and has been demonstrated to successfully improve the ventilation-perfusion match and reduce mortality in patients with severe respiratory failure. However, the effect of pronation on other organs than the lungs has not been widely studied. This study aimed to compare abdominal edema, perfusion and inflammation in supine and prone positioning in a porcine ARDS model.

Methods: Seventeen piglets were randomized into two groups: a supine group (n = 9) and a prone group (n = 8). Both groups received endotoxemic infusion and were observed for 6 h. Three animals per group underwent positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging (PET-MRI) for imaging acquisition. Hemodynamic and respiratory parameters were recorded throughout the protocol. Inflammation was assessed by measuring cytokine concentrations in blood, ascites and the abdominal organs' tissue. The edema in abdominal organs was assessed by wet-dry ratio and pathophysiological analysis of tissue samples and by MRI and PET measurements from volumes of interest (VOIs) delineated in abdominal organ in MRI and PET images. The abdominal organs' perfusion was also assessed by MRI and PET measurements.

Results: The prone group had a faster CO2 washout and needed a lower positive end-expiratory pressure to maintain the desired oxygenation. In the prone group duodenal edema was lower (measured with wet-dry ratio) and renal perfusion, by both MRI and PET measurements, was lower than half compared to the supine group (MRI, perfusion fraction, f: supine group 0.13; prone group 0.03; p-value 0.002. PET Flow: supine group 1.7; prone group 0.4 ml/cm3/min; p-value 0.002). In addition, the histopathological samples of the kidneys showed a higher incidence and extent of glomerular thrombosis in the prone group.

Conclusions: In a porcine ARDS model, prone positioning was associated with enhanced glomerular thrombosis and low renal perfusion.

ARDS前翻动物肾小球血栓形成增强。
背景:俯卧位是急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)治疗的一部分,已被证明可以成功改善严重呼吸衰竭患者的通气灌注匹配,降低死亡率。然而,除肺外,旋前对其他器官的影响尚未得到广泛研究。本研究旨在比较猪ARDS模型中仰卧位和俯卧位的腹部水肿、灌注和炎症。方法:17头仔猪随机分为仰卧位组(n = 9)和俯卧位组(n = 8)。两组均给予内毒素输注,观察6小时。每组3只动物行正电子发射断层扫描-磁共振成像(PET-MRI)成像采集。在整个过程中记录血液动力学和呼吸参数。通过测量血液、腹水和腹部器官组织中的细胞因子浓度来评估炎症。通过组织样本的干湿比和病理生理分析,以及通过MRI和PET图像中腹部器官的感兴趣体积(VOIs)测量来评估腹部器官的水肿。通过MRI和PET测量腹部脏器灌注情况。结果:俯卧组CO2洗脱更快,需要较低的呼气末正压来维持所需的氧合。俯卧组十二指肠水肿较低(以干湿比测量),通过MRI和PET测量,肾脏灌注低于仰卧组的一半(MRI,灌注分数,f:仰卧组0.13;倾向组0.03;假定值0.002。PET流量:仰卧位组1.7;俯卧组0.4 ml/cm3/min;假定值0.002)。此外,肾脏的组织病理学样本显示,肾小球血栓形成的发生率和程度在易感组较高。结论:在猪急性呼吸窘迫综合征模型中,俯卧位与肾小球血栓形成增强和肾灌注降低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信