Soil biome variation of Lupinus nipomensis in wet-cool vs. dry-warm microhabitats and greenhouse

IF 2.4 2区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Peter T. Nguyen, Justin C. Luong, Van Wishingrad, Lisa Stratton, Michael E. Loik, Rachel S. Meyer
{"title":"Soil biome variation of Lupinus nipomensis in wet-cool vs. dry-warm microhabitats and greenhouse","authors":"Peter T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Justin C. Luong,&nbsp;Van Wishingrad,&nbsp;Lisa Stratton,&nbsp;Michael E. Loik,&nbsp;Rachel S. Meyer","doi":"10.1002/ajb2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Premise</h3>\n \n <p>Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used to determine the composition of the soil biome community, revealing beneficial and antagonistic microbes and invertebrates associated with plants. eDNA analyses can complement traditional soil community studies, offering more comprehensive information for conservation practitioners. Studies are also needed to examine differences between field and greenhouse soil biomes because greenhouse-grown plants are often transplanted in the field during restoration efforts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used eDNA multilocus metabarcoding to test how the soil biome of the federally and state-endangered species, <i>Lupinus nipomensis</i>, differed between wet-cool and dry-warm microhabitats. At Arroyo Grande, California, 20 experimental plots were sampled, representing a factorial combination of wet-cool vs. dry-warm soil and plots that did or did not contain <i>L. nipomensis</i>. In a simultaneous greenhouse study, <i>L. nipomensis</i> was grown in drought and well-watered conditions to compare soil communities between field and greenhouse.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A diversity of carbon-cycling microorganisms but not nitrogen-fixers were overrepresented in the field, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria were overrepresented in some greenhouse treatments. The microbial communities in the field soils were more species-rich and evenly distributed than in greenhouse communities. In field plots, microhabitats significantly influenced community beta diversity, while field plots with or without <i>L. nipomensis</i> had no significant differences in alpha or beta diversity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study shows the utility of eDNA soil analysis in elucidating soil biome community differences for conservation and highlights the influence of plant microhabitats on soil microbe associations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7691,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Botany","volume":"112 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajb2.70020","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Botany","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajb2.70020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Premise

Environmental DNA (eDNA) can be used to determine the composition of the soil biome community, revealing beneficial and antagonistic microbes and invertebrates associated with plants. eDNA analyses can complement traditional soil community studies, offering more comprehensive information for conservation practitioners. Studies are also needed to examine differences between field and greenhouse soil biomes because greenhouse-grown plants are often transplanted in the field during restoration efforts.

Methods

We used eDNA multilocus metabarcoding to test how the soil biome of the federally and state-endangered species, Lupinus nipomensis, differed between wet-cool and dry-warm microhabitats. At Arroyo Grande, California, 20 experimental plots were sampled, representing a factorial combination of wet-cool vs. dry-warm soil and plots that did or did not contain L. nipomensis. In a simultaneous greenhouse study, L. nipomensis was grown in drought and well-watered conditions to compare soil communities between field and greenhouse.

Results

A diversity of carbon-cycling microorganisms but not nitrogen-fixers were overrepresented in the field, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria were overrepresented in some greenhouse treatments. The microbial communities in the field soils were more species-rich and evenly distributed than in greenhouse communities. In field plots, microhabitats significantly influenced community beta diversity, while field plots with or without L. nipomensis had no significant differences in alpha or beta diversity.

Conclusions

Our study shows the utility of eDNA soil analysis in elucidating soil biome community differences for conservation and highlights the influence of plant microhabitats on soil microbe associations.

Abstract Image

湿冷与干暖微生境和温室中羽扇豆的土壤生物群落变化。
前提:环境DNA (Environmental DNA, eDNA)可以用来确定土壤生物群落的组成,揭示与植物相关的有益和拮抗微生物和无脊椎动物。eDNA分析可以补充传统的土壤群落研究,为土壤保护从业者提供更全面的信息。还需要研究田间和温室土壤生物群系的差异,因为在恢复过程中,温室种植的植物经常被移植到田间。方法:采用eDNA多位点元条形码技术,对联邦濒危物种和州濒危物种Lupinus niomensis土壤生物群落在湿冷和干暖微生境中的差异进行了研究。在加利福尼亚州阿罗约格兰德,对20个试验田进行了采样,代表了湿冷与干暖土壤的因子组合,以及是否含有L. nipomensis的地块。在同时进行的温室研究中,在干旱和水分充足的条件下生长,比较大田和温室土壤群落。结果:土壤中碳循环微生物多样性高,固氮菌多样性不高,某些温室处理中固氮菌多样性高。田间土壤微生物群落种类丰富,分布均匀。在野外样地中,微生境对群落β多样性有显著影响,而在野外样地中,有或没有羊草对群落α和β多样性无显著影响。结论:我们的研究显示了eDNA土壤分析在阐明土壤生物群系差异保护方面的实用性,并强调了植物微生境对土壤微生物关联的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Botany
American Journal of Botany 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
171
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Botany (AJB), the flagship journal of the Botanical Society of America (BSA), publishes peer-reviewed, innovative, significant research of interest to a wide audience of plant scientists in all areas of plant biology (structure, function, development, diversity, genetics, evolution, systematics), all levels of organization (molecular to ecosystem), and all plant groups and allied organisms (cyanobacteria, algae, fungi, and lichens). AJB requires authors to frame their research questions and discuss their results in terms of major questions of plant biology. In general, papers that are too narrowly focused, purely descriptive, natural history, broad surveys, or that contain only preliminary data will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信