Arif Yılmaz, Bilge Kağan Yılmaz, Çiğdem Karaca, Necmettin Karasu
{"title":"Investigation of the Effect of Preconditioning with Ultrasound on Fat Graft Survival.","authors":"Arif Yılmaz, Bilge Kağan Yılmaz, Çiğdem Karaca, Necmettin Karasu","doi":"10.1007/s00266-025-04771-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of fat grafts in plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery has been increasing. Although fat grafting has many advantages, there is limited evidence regarding its survival rates. Current studies focus on improving fat graft survival rates. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of therapeutic ultrasound (TERUS) application on fat graft survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 42 adult male Wistar Albino rats, which were randomly divided into seven groups of six rats each: Group 1 served as the control group and received only fat grafting; Group 2 received preoperative daily TERUS for one week, followed by fat grafting; Group 3 underwent preoperative daily massage for one week, followed by fat grafting; Group 4 received preoperative daily TERUS for one week, followed by fat grafting and postoperative daily TERUS for one week; Group 5 underwent preoperative daily massage for one week, followed by fat grafting and postoperative daily massage for one week; Group 6 received postoperative daily TERUS for one week; and Group 7 received postoperative daily massage for one week. After volume and weight measurements, immunohistochemical evaluation was conducted using perilipin and PECAM-1. Apoptosis was assessed using the TUNEL method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in the macroscopic measurements. While TERUS increased the vascularization of fat grafts, it did not improve survival rates. The mean fat graft survival rate in the preoperative-postoperative massage group (Group 5) was statistically significantly higher than in the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study suggest that the massage effect of TERUS, independent of ultrasonic energy, may be beneficial for fat graft survival. Although TERUS increases the vascularity of fat grafts, it does not improve fat graft survival rates.</p><p><strong>No level assigned: </strong>This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .</p>","PeriodicalId":7609,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-025-04771-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The use of fat grafts in plastic, reconstructive, and aesthetic surgery has been increasing. Although fat grafting has many advantages, there is limited evidence regarding its survival rates. Current studies focus on improving fat graft survival rates. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of therapeutic ultrasound (TERUS) application on fat graft survival.
Methods: The study involved 42 adult male Wistar Albino rats, which were randomly divided into seven groups of six rats each: Group 1 served as the control group and received only fat grafting; Group 2 received preoperative daily TERUS for one week, followed by fat grafting; Group 3 underwent preoperative daily massage for one week, followed by fat grafting; Group 4 received preoperative daily TERUS for one week, followed by fat grafting and postoperative daily TERUS for one week; Group 5 underwent preoperative daily massage for one week, followed by fat grafting and postoperative daily massage for one week; Group 6 received postoperative daily TERUS for one week; and Group 7 received postoperative daily massage for one week. After volume and weight measurements, immunohistochemical evaluation was conducted using perilipin and PECAM-1. Apoptosis was assessed using the TUNEL method.
Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the macroscopic measurements. While TERUS increased the vascularization of fat grafts, it did not improve survival rates. The mean fat graft survival rate in the preoperative-postoperative massage group (Group 5) was statistically significantly higher than in the other groups.
Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that the massage effect of TERUS, independent of ultrasonic energy, may be beneficial for fat graft survival. Although TERUS increases the vascularity of fat grafts, it does not improve fat graft survival rates.
No level assigned: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
期刊介绍：
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is a publication of the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and the official journal of the European Association of Societies of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (EASAPS), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Plastica Ricostruttiva ed Estetica (SICPRE), Vereinigung der Deutschen Aesthetisch Plastischen Chirurgen (VDAPC), the Romanian Aesthetic Surgery Society (RASS), Asociación Española de Cirugía Estética Plástica (AECEP), La Sociedad Argentina de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reparadora (SACPER), the Rhinoplasty Society of Europe (RSE), the Iranian Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgeons (ISPAS), the Singapore Association of Plastic Surgeons (SAPS), the Australasian Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons (ASAPS), the Egyptian Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (ESPRS), and the Sociedad Chilena de Cirugía Plástica, Reconstructiva y Estética (SCCP).
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery provides a forum for original articles advancing the art of aesthetic plastic surgery. Many describe surgical craftsmanship; others deal with complications in surgical procedures and methods by which to treat or avoid them. Coverage includes "second thoughts" on established techniques, which might be abandoned, modified, or improved. Also included are case histories; improvements in surgical instruments, pharmaceuticals, and operating room equipment; and discussions of problems such as the role of psychosocial factors in the doctor-patient and the patient-public interrelationships.
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery is covered in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, SciSearch, Research Alert, Index Medicus-Medline, and Excerpta Medica/Embase.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
