How Do Network Embeddedness and Node Attributes Identify Key Inventors? A Dynamic fsQCA Analysis

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Ke-Chiun Chang;Shuyu Zhang;Yiman Zhang;Yen-Chun Lai
{"title":"How Do Network Embeddedness and Node Attributes Identify Key Inventors? A Dynamic fsQCA Analysis","authors":"Ke-Chiun Chang;Shuyu Zhang;Yiman Zhang;Yen-Chun Lai","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3527539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network embeddedness and node attributes are widely regarded as important dimensions for the formation of key inventors, but few studies have clarified the mechanism of identifying key inventors from a dynamic perspective. Based on a sample of nano-energy and dynamic fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, results show that multiple causal configurations equally explain the conditions for identifying key inventors, in which novelty of knowledge combination is always the core condition in the four time periods, but tie strength is never present. In terms of interconditional relationship patterns, novelty of knowledge combination and knowledge depth remain relatively stable across all time periods, with knowledge depth and knowledge scope mutually reinforcing each other within the same period. The association between structural holes and conditions within node attributes has been progressively diminishing since the high efficiency R&D period. Theoretically, this study provides a dynamic research framework for identifying key inventors, but also challenges the paradoxical view of network embeddedness and the opposing view of knowledge recombination. Practical insights for managers and policymakers to identify and cultivate key inventors are provided by offering conditions and configurations evolution trajectory.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"619-633"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10834596/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network embeddedness and node attributes are widely regarded as important dimensions for the formation of key inventors, but few studies have clarified the mechanism of identifying key inventors from a dynamic perspective. Based on a sample of nano-energy and dynamic fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis, results show that multiple causal configurations equally explain the conditions for identifying key inventors, in which novelty of knowledge combination is always the core condition in the four time periods, but tie strength is never present. In terms of interconditional relationship patterns, novelty of knowledge combination and knowledge depth remain relatively stable across all time periods, with knowledge depth and knowledge scope mutually reinforcing each other within the same period. The association between structural holes and conditions within node attributes has been progressively diminishing since the high efficiency R&D period. Theoretically, this study provides a dynamic research framework for identifying key inventors, but also challenges the paradoxical view of network embeddedness and the opposing view of knowledge recombination. Practical insights for managers and policymakers to identify and cultivate key inventors are provided by offering conditions and configurations evolution trajectory.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信