Deconstructing Corporate Accelerator Programs: Insights From a Systematic Literature Review

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Benedikt Unger;Tobias Gutmann
{"title":"Deconstructing Corporate Accelerator Programs: Insights From a Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Benedikt Unger;Tobias Gutmann","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3541533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corporate accelerators (CAs) are corporate-run programs supporting startup development and growth while generating mutual benefits. Despite the considerable academic attention they have received, gaps in the discourse still persist. These include a lack of consistent understanding of what constitutes a CA within and across (emerging) subtypes and how they operate and can be configured to achieve specific outcomes. As a result, the precise operational and strategic logic of CAs remains unclear and fragmented, complicating theory development, empirical testing, and practical implementation. To address these shortcomings, we employ a context, interventions, mechanisms, outcomes (CIMO) logic rooted in the realist tradition to both systematically organize and synthesize existing findings. Specifically, this article advances the discourse on CAs by clarifying their conceptualization and operation within and across subtypes. Additionally, it links specific interventions and mechanisms to outcomes through generalizable propositions. The resulting framework offers theoretical insights for configuring CAs to fulfill specific strategic roles in various organizational settings, with implications for their effective use and paving the way for future empirical testing and performance evaluation.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"784-799"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10884715/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Corporate accelerators (CAs) are corporate-run programs supporting startup development and growth while generating mutual benefits. Despite the considerable academic attention they have received, gaps in the discourse still persist. These include a lack of consistent understanding of what constitutes a CA within and across (emerging) subtypes and how they operate and can be configured to achieve specific outcomes. As a result, the precise operational and strategic logic of CAs remains unclear and fragmented, complicating theory development, empirical testing, and practical implementation. To address these shortcomings, we employ a context, interventions, mechanisms, outcomes (CIMO) logic rooted in the realist tradition to both systematically organize and synthesize existing findings. Specifically, this article advances the discourse on CAs by clarifying their conceptualization and operation within and across subtypes. Additionally, it links specific interventions and mechanisms to outcomes through generalizable propositions. The resulting framework offers theoretical insights for configuring CAs to fulfill specific strategic roles in various organizational settings, with implications for their effective use and paving the way for future empirical testing and performance evaluation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信