An Integrated Framework of Multidisciplinary Decision Making Under Uncertainty for Sustainable Infrastructure Development

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Bin Xue;Kexin Chang;Yufeng Fan;Xingbin Chen;Tae Wan Kim;Bingsheng Liu
{"title":"An Integrated Framework of Multidisciplinary Decision Making Under Uncertainty for Sustainable Infrastructure Development","authors":"Bin Xue;Kexin Chang;Yufeng Fan;Xingbin Chen;Tae Wan Kim;Bingsheng Liu","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2025.3540270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Uncertainty management in multidisciplinary decision making (MDM) involving stakeholders with discipline-specific expertise is imperative for the operations of developing urban infrastructure projects with multidimensional sustainability goals. Preference uncertainty and outcome uncertainty must be addressed simultaneously for theorizing and modeling in such MDM processes. Thus, in this article, we formalize an integrated MDM (iMDM) system to consistently mitigate preference uncertainty in decision alternative evaluation and expeditiously manage outcome uncertainty in decision alternative selection. Unlike the existing decision-making methods that often overlook different uncertainty characteristics in multidisciplinary operations management, the proposed system accounts for both uncertainties by specified information representation and integrated information optimization to enlarge decision spaces. Empirical evaluations in three real-world scenarios indicate that the iMDM system can mitigate and manage uncertainty to derive distinguishable alternative rankings and to generate optimized Pareto alternative sets. We further validate the effectiveness of the system using Charrette tests by quantifying the consistency and expeditiousness of both managing uncertainty and deriving desirable decision alternatives. Our contributions build upon the theoretical foundation of MDM under uncertainty and extend sustainable operations management science by clarifying decision information rationales from an uncertainty management perspective. Practically, findings benefit infrastructure operations’ managers and urban planners in making sustainability decisions in visualized, integrated, and automated manners.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"72 ","pages":"751-767"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10878794/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uncertainty management in multidisciplinary decision making (MDM) involving stakeholders with discipline-specific expertise is imperative for the operations of developing urban infrastructure projects with multidimensional sustainability goals. Preference uncertainty and outcome uncertainty must be addressed simultaneously for theorizing and modeling in such MDM processes. Thus, in this article, we formalize an integrated MDM (iMDM) system to consistently mitigate preference uncertainty in decision alternative evaluation and expeditiously manage outcome uncertainty in decision alternative selection. Unlike the existing decision-making methods that often overlook different uncertainty characteristics in multidisciplinary operations management, the proposed system accounts for both uncertainties by specified information representation and integrated information optimization to enlarge decision spaces. Empirical evaluations in three real-world scenarios indicate that the iMDM system can mitigate and manage uncertainty to derive distinguishable alternative rankings and to generate optimized Pareto alternative sets. We further validate the effectiveness of the system using Charrette tests by quantifying the consistency and expeditiousness of both managing uncertainty and deriving desirable decision alternatives. Our contributions build upon the theoretical foundation of MDM under uncertainty and extend sustainable operations management science by clarifying decision information rationales from an uncertainty management perspective. Practically, findings benefit infrastructure operations’ managers and urban planners in making sustainability decisions in visualized, integrated, and automated manners.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信