Multi-joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: Reliability and precision in school-aged children

IF 4.1 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Nina Jacobs, Maud van den Bogaart, Ann Hallemans, Pieter Meyns
{"title":"Multi-joint approach for assessing lower limb proprioception: Reliability and precision in school-aged children","authors":"Nina Jacobs,&nbsp;Maud van den Bogaart,&nbsp;Ann Hallemans,&nbsp;Pieter Meyns","doi":"10.1111/nyas.15305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The joint position reproduction (JPR) approach is commonly used to assess joint position sense (JPS), but its psychometric properties in children remain unexplored. This study aimed to assess the reliability and precision of a multi-joint JPR protocol for assessing lower-limb JPS in typically developing (TD) children. Ankle, knee, and hip JPS were assessed in TD children (aged 5–12 years), on two different days, by a single rater using a standardized JPR protocol. The mean and best error (joint reproduction error, °) between the target and reproduction angle were calculated from three-dimensional kinematics for each joint across three trials. Total, joint, and limb JRE scores were provided. For JPR reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 2.1) was reported. For JPR precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. Across 270 JPR trials (15 children, 8.6 ± 1.2 years, 8 boys), the mean and best JRE were 3.7° and 2.5°, respectively. The ICC ranged from poor to fair (0.01–0.44) for mean JRE, and fair to very good (0.46–0.77) for best JRE. The SEM ranged from 0.8° to 1.8°. The SDD was less than 5°, ranging from 2.3° to 4.5°. Evaluating ankle, knee, and hip JPS in children using passive JPR is more reliable and precise when using the best JRE. This study highlights the need for a multi-joint JPR approach and provide joint- and limb-specific SEM and SDD values.</p>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1546 1","pages":"144-156"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.15305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The joint position reproduction (JPR) approach is commonly used to assess joint position sense (JPS), but its psychometric properties in children remain unexplored. This study aimed to assess the reliability and precision of a multi-joint JPR protocol for assessing lower-limb JPS in typically developing (TD) children. Ankle, knee, and hip JPS were assessed in TD children (aged 5–12 years), on two different days, by a single rater using a standardized JPR protocol. The mean and best error (joint reproduction error, °) between the target and reproduction angle were calculated from three-dimensional kinematics for each joint across three trials. Total, joint, and limb JRE scores were provided. For JPR reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 2.1) was reported. For JPR precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable difference (SDD) were calculated. Across 270 JPR trials (15 children, 8.6 ± 1.2 years, 8 boys), the mean and best JRE were 3.7° and 2.5°, respectively. The ICC ranged from poor to fair (0.01–0.44) for mean JRE, and fair to very good (0.46–0.77) for best JRE. The SEM ranged from 0.8° to 1.8°. The SDD was less than 5°, ranging from 2.3° to 4.5°. Evaluating ankle, knee, and hip JPS in children using passive JPR is more reliable and precise when using the best JRE. This study highlights the need for a multi-joint JPR approach and provide joint- and limb-specific SEM and SDD values.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

多关节方法评估学龄期儿童下肢本体感觉:可靠性和精确性
关节位置再现法(JPR)是一种常用的评估关节位置感的方法,但其在儿童中的心理测量特性尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估多关节JPR方案用于评估典型发育(TD)儿童下肢JPS的可靠性和准确性。在两个不同的日子,由单一评分者使用标准化的JPR方案评估TD儿童(5-12岁)的踝关节、膝关节和髋关节JPS。从三次试验中每个关节的三维运动学出发,计算目标与再现角之间的平均误差和最佳误差(关节再现误差,°)。提供总体、关节和肢体JRE评分。对于JPR信度,报告了类内相关系数(ICC, 2.1)。对于JPR精度,计算了测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测差(SDD)。在270项JPR试验中(15名儿童,8.6±1.2岁,8名男孩),平均JRE和最佳JRE分别为3.7°和2.5°。对于普通JRE, ICC从差到一般(0.01-0.44),对于最佳JRE, ICC从一般到非常好(0.46-0.77)。扫描电镜范围为0.8°~ 1.8°。SDD小于5°,范围为2.3°~ 4.5°。当使用最佳JRE时,使用被动JPR评估儿童踝关节、膝关节和髋关节JPS更可靠和准确。该研究强调了多关节JPR方法的必要性,并提供了关节和肢体特定的SEM和SDD值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
1.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信