The There that is There and the There that is Not: Reflections on Taking Stock of Communication & Sport as a Disciplinary Project

IF 2.8 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Lawrence A. Wenner
{"title":"The There that is There and the There that is Not: Reflections on Taking Stock of Communication & Sport as a Disciplinary Project","authors":"Lawrence A. Wenner","doi":"10.1177/21674795251328939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, the founding editor of <jats:italic>Communication &amp;</jats:italic> Sport considers an important study by Cummins and Hahn of the first ten years of research published in the journal. In framing the essay, the larger enterprise of research at the nexus of communication is situated on the larger playing and more established playing fields of the social sciences and humanities. It is argued that the twin fields that comprise this disciplinary focus—communication and sport—have been perpetually plagued by a “need for legitimization” complex and that this need may be driving the focus of this ten year assessment on questions of method and theory. In reacting to findings of continued focus on content-focused studies, obstacles of research approval, garnering samples, and gaining access are both noted and need to be overcome. In assessing the “critical turn” in research method, the evidence suggests that the death of empirical analysis has been greatly exaggerated. In reacting to “theoretical messiness” found in the ten year assessment, it is argued that such concerns are less important in establishing the field than an audit of <jats:italic>what drives the questions we ask</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>why our answers matter</jats:italic> . The essay closes by research models that might better assess whether we are asking the right questions and what is at the heart of the research enterprise for <jats:italic>Communication &amp; Sport</jats:italic> .","PeriodicalId":46882,"journal":{"name":"Communication & Sport","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication & Sport","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21674795251328939","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, the founding editor of Communication & Sport considers an important study by Cummins and Hahn of the first ten years of research published in the journal. In framing the essay, the larger enterprise of research at the nexus of communication is situated on the larger playing and more established playing fields of the social sciences and humanities. It is argued that the twin fields that comprise this disciplinary focus—communication and sport—have been perpetually plagued by a “need for legitimization” complex and that this need may be driving the focus of this ten year assessment on questions of method and theory. In reacting to findings of continued focus on content-focused studies, obstacles of research approval, garnering samples, and gaining access are both noted and need to be overcome. In assessing the “critical turn” in research method, the evidence suggests that the death of empirical analysis has been greatly exaggerated. In reacting to “theoretical messiness” found in the ten year assessment, it is argued that such concerns are less important in establishing the field than an audit of what drives the questions we ask and why our answers matter . The essay closes by research models that might better assess whether we are asking the right questions and what is at the heart of the research enterprise for Communication & Sport .
存在的存在与不存在的存在:关于将传播与体育作为一个学科项目进行评估的思考
在本文中,《传播》杂志的创始编辑;Sport考虑了康明斯和哈恩在该杂志上发表的前十年研究的一项重要研究。在这篇文章的框架中,研究交流关系的更大的企业位于社会科学和人文科学的更大的和更成熟的竞争领域。有人认为,构成这一学科焦点的两个领域——传播和体育——一直受到“合法化需求”情结的困扰,这种需求可能推动了这一十年评估的重点,即方法和理论问题。在对继续关注以内容为中心的研究的结果作出反应时,研究批准、收集样本和获得访问的障碍都被注意到,并且需要克服。在评估研究方法的“关键转折”时,有证据表明,实证分析的死亡被大大夸大了。在回应十年评估中发现的“理论混乱”时,有人认为,在建立这一领域方面,这些担忧不如审计我们提出问题的原因以及我们的答案为什么重要来得重要。本文以研究模型结束,这些模型可以更好地评估我们是否提出了正确的问题,以及研究企业的核心是什么。运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信