Life cycle assessment of a partially renewable blend for bi-fuel passenger cars and comparison with petrol and battery electric cars

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Stefano Puricelli, Michelle Eid, Simone Casadei, Giovanni Dolci, Simone Lixi, Anne van den Oever, Lucia Rigamonti, Mario Grosso
{"title":"Life cycle assessment of a partially renewable blend for bi-fuel passenger cars and comparison with petrol and battery electric cars","authors":"Stefano Puricelli, Michelle Eid, Simone Casadei, Giovanni Dolci, Simone Lixi, Anne van den Oever, Lucia Rigamonti, Mario Grosso","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study assesses the environmental impacts of the life cycle of B- and C-segment passenger cars fuelled by a blend of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) (60% m/m), bio-LPG (20% m/m), and renewable dimethyl ether (20% m/m), comparing them to petrol cars and battery electric vehicles. In the EU, this blend could be implemented to reduce the greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions of the 8.3 million passenger cars currently fuelled with LPG. The blend exploits the transformation of waste products such as used cooking oils, organic wastes, and non-recyclable plastics into fuels, thus helping the transition to a circular economy. Practical use of the blend is possible, as its use resulted in compliance with the standards on marketing (EN 589:2018) and use (Euro 6) of LPG in passenger cars. According to the results of this study, for all the impact categories, the magnitude of impacts increases as the car size increases. Depending on the car segment, the blend reduces GHG emissions by 16-21% compared to petrol, and it shows preference over petrol in 5 impact categories out of 16, while being disadvantageous in 2-5 categories. Electric cars outperform petrol in the same 5 categories (reducing GHG emissions by 36-38% compared to petrol) but are detrimental in ten others. The study revealed increases higher than 200% in water consumption, for all the alternative propulsion systems. Future efforts should focus on fully renewable blends and address the potential limitations of waste feedstock availability used as input for the blend production.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145347","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assesses the environmental impacts of the life cycle of B- and C-segment passenger cars fuelled by a blend of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) (60% m/m), bio-LPG (20% m/m), and renewable dimethyl ether (20% m/m), comparing them to petrol cars and battery electric vehicles. In the EU, this blend could be implemented to reduce the greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions of the 8.3 million passenger cars currently fuelled with LPG. The blend exploits the transformation of waste products such as used cooking oils, organic wastes, and non-recyclable plastics into fuels, thus helping the transition to a circular economy. Practical use of the blend is possible, as its use resulted in compliance with the standards on marketing (EN 589:2018) and use (Euro 6) of LPG in passenger cars. According to the results of this study, for all the impact categories, the magnitude of impacts increases as the car size increases. Depending on the car segment, the blend reduces GHG emissions by 16-21% compared to petrol, and it shows preference over petrol in 5 impact categories out of 16, while being disadvantageous in 2-5 categories. Electric cars outperform petrol in the same 5 categories (reducing GHG emissions by 36-38% compared to petrol) but are detrimental in ten others. The study revealed increases higher than 200% in water consumption, for all the alternative propulsion systems. Future efforts should focus on fully renewable blends and address the potential limitations of waste feedstock availability used as input for the blend production.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信