Ten years after Regulation 536/2014: ethical reflection on the role of Ethics Committees in Italy.

Chiara Mannelli, Giovanna Floridia, Sabina Gainotti, Luciana Riva, Carlo Petrini
{"title":"Ten years after Regulation 536/2014: ethical reflection on the role of Ethics Committees in Italy.","authors":"Chiara Mannelli, Giovanna Floridia, Sabina Gainotti, Luciana Riva, Carlo Petrini","doi":"10.4415/ANN_25_01_10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since their institution, Ethics Committees (ECs) dedicated to the ethical evaluation of research protocols have been traditionally entrusted with the role of finding a delicate balance between protecting research participants' rights and avoiding the hampering of scientific progress. In Europe, these bodies have evolved significantly over time, shaped by a dynamic regulatory framework culminating in Regulation (EU) 536/2014, which has been fully applied since 2022. Focusing on the Italian scenario, a decade after the adoption of the Regulation (2014-2024), this paper is aimed at shedding light on the extent to which the evolution of the pertinent normative framework has affected ECs' space for reflection within the ethics review process of clinical trials, essential to protect the rights of research participants. Although focused on the Italian scenario, the analysis holds relevance for the broader European context, since the Regulation is unique and developments in a single Member State may impact the others.</p>","PeriodicalId":502090,"journal":{"name":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","volume":"61 1","pages":"82-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4415/ANN_25_01_10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since their institution, Ethics Committees (ECs) dedicated to the ethical evaluation of research protocols have been traditionally entrusted with the role of finding a delicate balance between protecting research participants' rights and avoiding the hampering of scientific progress. In Europe, these bodies have evolved significantly over time, shaped by a dynamic regulatory framework culminating in Regulation (EU) 536/2014, which has been fully applied since 2022. Focusing on the Italian scenario, a decade after the adoption of the Regulation (2014-2024), this paper is aimed at shedding light on the extent to which the evolution of the pertinent normative framework has affected ECs' space for reflection within the ethics review process of clinical trials, essential to protect the rights of research participants. Although focused on the Italian scenario, the analysis holds relevance for the broader European context, since the Regulation is unique and developments in a single Member State may impact the others.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信