Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Conventional Oxygen Therapy for High-Risk Patients During Bronchoscopy Examination: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hao Qin, Jie Li, Jun Wang, Yu-Guang Yang, Guo-Qiang Jing, Rong-Zhang Chen, Wei Tan, Yong-Qi Zhang, Tian Li, Jun-Ci Yang, Bing Dai, Qin Wang, Yang Jiao, Yang Xia, Hai-Dong Huang, Qiang Li, Yu-Chao Dong, Chong Bai, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Conventional Oxygen Therapy for High-Risk Patients During Bronchoscopy Examination: A Multi-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hao Qin, Jie Li, Jun Wang, Yu-Guang Yang, Guo-Qiang Jing, Rong-Zhang Chen, Wei Tan, Yong-Qi Zhang, Tian Li, Jun-Ci Yang, Bing Dai, Qin Wang, Yang Jiao, Yang Xia, Hai-Dong Huang, Qiang Li, Yu-Chao Dong, Chong Bai, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1109OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Despite the increasing use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy during endoscopy examination, its impact on high-risk patients remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>we aimed to compare HFNC and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) during nasal bronchoscopy in patients at high-risk for desaturation (morbid obesity, narrow trachea, or baseline hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>In this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients scheduled for bronchoscopy and presenting with any high-risk factors were randomly assigned to receive HFNC or COT after providing written consent. Vital signs, pulse oximetry (SpO<sub>2</sub>), and transcutaneous carbon dioxide (PtCO<sub>2</sub>) were continuously monitored. The occurrence of desaturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>≤90% lasted >10s), frequency of examination interruption and treatment escalation were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 148 initially enrolled patients, six withdrew, leaving 72 and 70 in the HFNC and COT groups, respectively. Most of the patients had airway stenosis. HFNC significantly reduced desaturation occurrence during bronchoscopy (34.7 vs. 61.4%, p=0.016), with fewer instances of examination interruption (26.4 vs. 58.6%, p<0.001) and less frequent treatment escalation (30.6 vs. 57.1%, p=0.001). During the examination, the lowest SpO<sub>2</sub> was higher with HFNC (94[IQR, 87-98] vs 87.5[79-93]%, p=0.001), while the highest PtCO<sub>2</sub> was lower (64.6[56.8-70.1] vs 68.3[62.3-77.0] mmHg, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed regarding the time to the first desaturation, bronchoscopy withdrawal, durations of desaturation and bronchoscopy examination, or occurrence of other adverse events between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a high-risk population with predominantly airway stenosis, HFNC significantly reduced desaturation occurrence, examination interruption, and treatment escalation during nasal bronchoscopy examination in high-risk patients. Clinical trial registration available at www.ChiCTR.org.cn, ID: ChiCTR2100055038.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202410-1109OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Despite the increasing use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy during endoscopy examination, its impact on high-risk patients remains uncertain.

Objectives: we aimed to compare HFNC and conventional oxygen therapy (COT) during nasal bronchoscopy in patients at high-risk for desaturation (morbid obesity, narrow trachea, or baseline hypoxemia and/or hypercapnia).

Measurements: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT), patients scheduled for bronchoscopy and presenting with any high-risk factors were randomly assigned to receive HFNC or COT after providing written consent. Vital signs, pulse oximetry (SpO2), and transcutaneous carbon dioxide (PtCO2) were continuously monitored. The occurrence of desaturation (SpO2≤90% lasted >10s), frequency of examination interruption and treatment escalation were compared between groups.

Results: Of 148 initially enrolled patients, six withdrew, leaving 72 and 70 in the HFNC and COT groups, respectively. Most of the patients had airway stenosis. HFNC significantly reduced desaturation occurrence during bronchoscopy (34.7 vs. 61.4%, p=0.016), with fewer instances of examination interruption (26.4 vs. 58.6%, p<0.001) and less frequent treatment escalation (30.6 vs. 57.1%, p=0.001). During the examination, the lowest SpO2 was higher with HFNC (94[IQR, 87-98] vs 87.5[79-93]%, p=0.001), while the highest PtCO2 was lower (64.6[56.8-70.1] vs 68.3[62.3-77.0] mmHg, p=0.04). No significant differences were observed regarding the time to the first desaturation, bronchoscopy withdrawal, durations of desaturation and bronchoscopy examination, or occurrence of other adverse events between groups.

Conclusions: In a high-risk population with predominantly airway stenosis, HFNC significantly reduced desaturation occurrence, examination interruption, and treatment escalation during nasal bronchoscopy examination in high-risk patients. Clinical trial registration available at www.ChiCTR.org.cn, ID: ChiCTR2100055038.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信