Multi-modal artificial intelligence algorithm for the prediction of left atrial low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation patient based on sinus rhythm electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics: a retrospective, multicentre study.

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztae095
Yirao Tao, Deyun Zhang, Naidong Pang, Shijia Geng, Chen Tan, Ying Tian, Shenda Hong, XingPeng Liu
{"title":"Multi-modal artificial intelligence algorithm for the prediction of left atrial low-voltage areas in atrial fibrillation patient based on sinus rhythm electrocardiogram and clinical characteristics: a retrospective, multicentre study.","authors":"Yirao Tao, Deyun Zhang, Naidong Pang, Shijia Geng, Chen Tan, Ying Tian, Shenda Hong, XingPeng Liu","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztae095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm capable of accurately predicting the presence of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) based on sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study included 1133 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation procedures, with a total of 1787 12-lead ECG images analysed. Artificial intelligence-based algorithms were used to construct models for predicting the presence of LVAs. The DR-FLASH and APPLE clinical scores for LVAs prediction were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were used to evaluate model performance. Multicentre validation included 92 AF patients from five centres, with a total of 174 ECGs. The data obtained from the participants were split into training (<i>n</i> = 906), validation (<i>n</i> = 113), and test sets (<i>n</i> = 114). Low-voltage areas were detected in 47.4% of all participants. Using ECG alone, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.704, outperforming both the DR-FLASH score (AUROC = 0.601) and the APPLE score (AUROC = 0.589). Two multimodal AI models, which integrated ECG images and clinical features, demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (AUROC 0.816 and 0.796 for the CNN-Multimodal and CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal models, respectively). Our models also performed well in the multicentre validation dataset (AUROC 0.711, 0.785, and 0.879 for the ECG alone, CNN-Multimodal, and CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal models, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multimodal AI algorithm, which integrated ECG images and clinical features, predicted the presence of LVAs with a higher degree of accuracy than ECG alone and the clinical LVA scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 2","pages":"200-208"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztae095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm capable of accurately predicting the presence of left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) based on sinus rhythm electrocardiograms (ECGs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods and results: The study included 1133 patients with AF who underwent catheter ablation procedures, with a total of 1787 12-lead ECG images analysed. Artificial intelligence-based algorithms were used to construct models for predicting the presence of LVAs. The DR-FLASH and APPLE clinical scores for LVAs prediction were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and a calibration curve were used to evaluate model performance. Multicentre validation included 92 AF patients from five centres, with a total of 174 ECGs. The data obtained from the participants were split into training (n = 906), validation (n = 113), and test sets (n = 114). Low-voltage areas were detected in 47.4% of all participants. Using ECG alone, the convolutional neural network (CNN) model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.704, outperforming both the DR-FLASH score (AUROC = 0.601) and the APPLE score (AUROC = 0.589). Two multimodal AI models, which integrated ECG images and clinical features, demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (AUROC 0.816 and 0.796 for the CNN-Multimodal and CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal models, respectively). Our models also performed well in the multicentre validation dataset (AUROC 0.711, 0.785, and 0.879 for the ECG alone, CNN-Multimodal, and CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal models, respectively).

Conclusion: The multimodal AI algorithm, which integrated ECG images and clinical features, predicted the presence of LVAs with a higher degree of accuracy than ECG alone and the clinical LVA scores.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于窦性心律心电图和临床特征预测心房颤动患者左房低压区的多模态人工智能算法:一项回顾性、多中心研究。
目的:我们旨在开发一种人工智能(AI)算法,能够根据心房颤动(AF)患者的窦性心律心电图(ECGs)准确预测左房低压区(lva)的存在。方法和结果:本研究纳入1133例接受导管消融治疗的房颤患者,共分析了1787张12导联心电图图像。使用基于人工智能的算法构建预测lva存在的模型。计算预测LVAs的DR-FLASH和APPLE临床评分。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和校正曲线评价模型的性能。多中心验证包括来自5个中心的92例房颤患者,共174例心电图。从参与者获得的数据被分为训练集(n = 906)、验证集(n = 113)和测试集(n = 114)。47.4%的参与者被检测到低压区。单独使用ECG时,卷积神经网络(CNN)模型的ROC曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.704,优于DR-FLASH评分(AUROC = 0.601)和APPLE评分(AUROC = 0.589)。两种整合心电图像和临床特征的多模态人工智能模型的诊断准确率更高(CNN-Multimodal和CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal模型的AUROC分别为0.816和0.796)。我们的模型在多中心验证数据集中也表现良好(单独ECG、CNN-Multimodal和CNN-Random Forest-Multimodal模型的AUROC分别为0.711、0.785和0.879)。结论:综合心电图图像和临床特征的多模态AI算法预测LVA是否存在的准确率高于单纯心电图和临床LVA评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信