Social organization and physical environment shape the microbiome of harvester ants.

IF 4.9 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Denisse Alejandra Gamboa, Peter J Flynn, Eva Sofia Horna-Lowell, Noa Pinter-Wollman
{"title":"Social organization and physical environment shape the microbiome of harvester ants.","authors":"Denisse Alejandra Gamboa, Peter J Flynn, Eva Sofia Horna-Lowell, Noa Pinter-Wollman","doi":"10.1186/s42523-025-00390-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All animals harbor microbiomes, which are obtained from the surrounding environment and are impacted by host behavior and life stage. To determine how two non-mutually exclusive drivers - physical environment and social organization - affect an organism's microbiome, we examined the bacterial communities within and around nests of harvester ants (Veromessor andrei). We collected soil and nest content samples from five different ant nests. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing and calculated alpha and beta diversity to compare bacterial diversity and community composition across samples. To test the hypotheses that physical environment and/or social organization impact ant colonies' community of microbes we compared our samples across (i) sample types (ants, brood, seeds and reproductives (winged alates), and soil), (ii) soil inside and outside the nest, and (iii) soil from different chamber types. Interestingly, we found that both the environment and social organization impact the bacterial communities of the microbiome of V. andrei colonies. Soil from the five nests differed from one another in a way that mapped onto their geographical distance. Furthermore, soil from inside the nests resembled the surrounding soil, supporting the physical environment hypothesis. However, the bacterial communities associated with the contents within the nest chambers, i.e., ants, brood, seeds, and reproductives, differed from one another and from the surrounding soil, supporting the social organization hypotheses. This study highlights the importance of considering environmental and social factors in understanding microbiome dynamics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72201,"journal":{"name":"Animal microbiome","volume":"7 1","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal microbiome","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42523-025-00390-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All animals harbor microbiomes, which are obtained from the surrounding environment and are impacted by host behavior and life stage. To determine how two non-mutually exclusive drivers - physical environment and social organization - affect an organism's microbiome, we examined the bacterial communities within and around nests of harvester ants (Veromessor andrei). We collected soil and nest content samples from five different ant nests. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing and calculated alpha and beta diversity to compare bacterial diversity and community composition across samples. To test the hypotheses that physical environment and/or social organization impact ant colonies' community of microbes we compared our samples across (i) sample types (ants, brood, seeds and reproductives (winged alates), and soil), (ii) soil inside and outside the nest, and (iii) soil from different chamber types. Interestingly, we found that both the environment and social organization impact the bacterial communities of the microbiome of V. andrei colonies. Soil from the five nests differed from one another in a way that mapped onto their geographical distance. Furthermore, soil from inside the nests resembled the surrounding soil, supporting the physical environment hypothesis. However, the bacterial communities associated with the contents within the nest chambers, i.e., ants, brood, seeds, and reproductives, differed from one another and from the surrounding soil, supporting the social organization hypotheses. This study highlights the importance of considering environmental and social factors in understanding microbiome dynamics.

社会组织和自然环境塑造了收获蚁的微生物群。
所有动物体内都有微生物群,它们是从周围环境中获得的,并受到宿主行为和生命阶段的影响。为了确定两个不相互排斥的驱动因素——物理环境和社会组织——如何影响生物体的微生物群,我们检查了收获蚁巢穴内部和周围的细菌群落。我们从五个不同的蚂蚁巢穴中收集了土壤和巢穴成分样本。我们使用16S rRNA基因测序并计算α和β多样性来比较不同样品的细菌多样性和群落组成。为了验证物理环境和/或社会组织影响蚁群微生物群落的假设,我们比较了我们的样品(i)样品类型(蚂蚁、幼虫、种子和繁殖物(有翅的alates)和土壤),(ii)巢内外土壤,(iii)不同室型土壤。有趣的是,我们发现环境和社会组织都会影响V. andrei菌落微生物组的细菌群落。五个巢穴的土壤各不相同,在某种程度上反映了它们的地理距离。此外,巢内的土壤与周围的土壤相似,这支持了物理环境假说。然而,与巢室内的内容物相关的细菌群落,即蚂蚁、幼虫、种子和生殖动物,彼此不同,与周围的土壤也不同,支持了社会组织假说。这项研究强调了在理解微生物组动力学中考虑环境和社会因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信