The Revolving Door Phenomenon in the Romanian Mental Health System.

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Alpha psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-02-28 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.31083/AP38789
Radu-Mihai Păun, Valentin Petre Matei, Cătălina Tudose
{"title":"The Revolving Door Phenomenon in the Romanian Mental Health System.","authors":"Radu-Mihai Păun, Valentin Petre Matei, Cătălina Tudose","doi":"10.31083/AP38789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized at least three times in a two-year period, have emerged as an unintended side effect of the deinstitutionalization of mental health in high-income countries. Guaranteeing access to high-quality outpatient services has shown to be the most effective method for alleviating the revolving door phenomenon. In Eastern Europe, deinstitutionalization is ongoing, 0 but the phenomenon has received little attention. The present cross-sectional study examined the revolving door phenomenon in the largest psychiatric inpatient unit in Bucharest, Romania.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Socio-demographic healthcare use and clinical characteristics of 144 patients were collected following admission to the \"Profesor Doctor Alexandru Obregia\" Psychiatric Hospital via an initial visit conducted between September 2022 and January 2023. A follow-up check occurred one year later to evaluate the number of readmissions and compare those who met the criteria for revolving door status at follow-up with those who did not. After identifying factors associated with revolving door status by univariate analysis, a bivariate model included the results to account for reciprocal moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 56 (38.9%) patients met the criteria for revolving door status. The number of lifetime hospitalizations was significantly higher in the revolving door group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.956, <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001), while involuntary admission on the initial visit decreased the odds of receiving a revolving door status on follow-up (OR = 0.188, <i>p</i> = 0.008). Revolving door patients had less time between readmissions than controls (OR = 0.991, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frequent hospitalization was the primary factor predicting revolving door status in the cohort studied, reflecting the Romanian mental health system's focus on inpatient care. This illustrates the need for reliable outpatient care as an alternative to hospital admission to avoid the self-perpetuating cycle of repeated admissions that are inefficient both from an economic and medical standpoint.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"26 1","pages":"38789"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11916060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/AP38789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalized at least three times in a two-year period, have emerged as an unintended side effect of the deinstitutionalization of mental health in high-income countries. Guaranteeing access to high-quality outpatient services has shown to be the most effective method for alleviating the revolving door phenomenon. In Eastern Europe, deinstitutionalization is ongoing, 0 but the phenomenon has received little attention. The present cross-sectional study examined the revolving door phenomenon in the largest psychiatric inpatient unit in Bucharest, Romania.

Methods: Socio-demographic healthcare use and clinical characteristics of 144 patients were collected following admission to the "Profesor Doctor Alexandru Obregia" Psychiatric Hospital via an initial visit conducted between September 2022 and January 2023. A follow-up check occurred one year later to evaluate the number of readmissions and compare those who met the criteria for revolving door status at follow-up with those who did not. After identifying factors associated with revolving door status by univariate analysis, a bivariate model included the results to account for reciprocal moderating effects.

Results: In total, 56 (38.9%) patients met the criteria for revolving door status. The number of lifetime hospitalizations was significantly higher in the revolving door group (odds ratio (OR) = 3.956, p ≤ 0.001), while involuntary admission on the initial visit decreased the odds of receiving a revolving door status on follow-up (OR = 0.188, p = 0.008). Revolving door patients had less time between readmissions than controls (OR = 0.991, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Frequent hospitalization was the primary factor predicting revolving door status in the cohort studied, reflecting the Romanian mental health system's focus on inpatient care. This illustrates the need for reliable outpatient care as an alternative to hospital admission to avoid the self-perpetuating cycle of repeated admissions that are inefficient both from an economic and medical standpoint.

背景:在高收入国家,两年内至少住院三次是精神健康非住院化的一个意外副作用。事实证明,保证高质量的门诊服务是缓解 "旋转门 "现象的最有效方法。在东欧,非机构化正在进行中0,但这一现象很少受到关注。本横断面研究考察了罗马尼亚布加勒斯特最大的精神病住院部的旋转门现象:方法:通过 2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 1 月期间的首次访问,收集了 "亚历山德鲁-奥布莱吉亚教授医生 "精神病医院收治的 144 名患者的社会人口学保健使用情况和临床特征。一年后进行了随访检查,以评估再次入院的人数,并将随访时符合 "旋转门 "标准的患者与不符合标准的患者进行比较。通过单变量分析确定与旋转门状态相关的因素后,将结果纳入双变量模型,以考虑相互调节作用:共有 56 名(38.9%)患者符合 "旋转门 "状态的标准。旋转门组终生住院次数明显较多(比值比 (OR) = 3.956,P ≤ 0.001),而初次就诊时的非自愿入院则降低了随访时获得旋转门状态的几率(比值比 = 0.188,P = 0.008)。与对照组相比,旋转门患者再次入院的间隔时间较短(OR = 0.991,p < 0.001):结论:在所研究的人群中,频繁住院是预测 "旋转门 "状态的主要因素,这反映了罗马尼亚精神卫生系统对住院治疗的重视。这说明需要可靠的门诊治疗来替代住院治疗,以避免重复入院的自我循环,因为从经济和医疗角度来看,重复入院都是低效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信