Long-Term Engagement of Diverse Study Cohorts in Decentralized Research: Longitudinal Analysis of "All of Us" Research Program Data.

IF 1.9 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Vijay Yadav, Elias Chaibub Neto, Megan Doerr, Abhishek Pratap, Larsson Omberg
{"title":"Long-Term Engagement of Diverse Study Cohorts in Decentralized Research: Longitudinal Analysis of \"All of Us\" Research Program Data.","authors":"Vijay Yadav, Elias Chaibub Neto, Megan Doerr, Abhishek Pratap, Larsson Omberg","doi":"10.2196/56803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The generalizability of clinical research hinges on robust study designs, which include the recruitment and maintenance of a representative study population. This study examines the evolution of the demographic characteristics of 329,038 participants who enrolled and participated in The All of Us Research Program (AoURP), a decentralized study aimed at representing the diversity of the United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objectives of this study were to assess alterations in the demographic composition of the cohort at different protocol stages within AoURP, while analyzing completion rates and timeframes for survey and substudy completion. Additionally, we examined how participant interactions with the program impacted engagement and survey responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a longitudinal analysis of the AoURP data, tracking changes in demographic composition, completion rates, and completion times for surveys and substudies. Comparative analyses were performed to assess differences in engagement and survey completion based on sociodemographic characteristics of participants involved in postenrollment study components.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sociodemographic composition of the cohort that participated in the postenrollment study (eg, optional components) differed significantly from that of the recruited population. The proportion of self-identified White participants increased by 21.2%, whereas the proportion of Black or African American participants decreased by 12.18% (P=.02). Participants who identified as White (n=93,614, 52.7%) and NonHispanic (n=109,279, 42.21%) were more engaged compared to those identifying as Black or African American (n=10,887, 15.76%), Asian (n=4274, 38.72%), or Hispanic (n=12,530, 20.7%; P=.006). Participants' response times to study surveys and completeness varied across all demographic groups (P<.001). Furthermore, those identifying as White skipped fewer survey questions (1.19) compared to those identifying as Black or African American (1.40) or other racial and ethnic identities (P<.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AoURP dataset serves as an exceptional resource for investigating diverse public health concerns. However, the longitudinal analysis of participant-level data underscores a significant skew in population diversity, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to enhance engagement and retention across all groups. Ensuring diversity in the cohort is essential for maintaining the study's representativeness and the broad applicability of its findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"e56803"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The generalizability of clinical research hinges on robust study designs, which include the recruitment and maintenance of a representative study population. This study examines the evolution of the demographic characteristics of 329,038 participants who enrolled and participated in The All of Us Research Program (AoURP), a decentralized study aimed at representing the diversity of the United States.

Objective: The primary objectives of this study were to assess alterations in the demographic composition of the cohort at different protocol stages within AoURP, while analyzing completion rates and timeframes for survey and substudy completion. Additionally, we examined how participant interactions with the program impacted engagement and survey responses.

Methods: We conducted a longitudinal analysis of the AoURP data, tracking changes in demographic composition, completion rates, and completion times for surveys and substudies. Comparative analyses were performed to assess differences in engagement and survey completion based on sociodemographic characteristics of participants involved in postenrollment study components.

Results: The sociodemographic composition of the cohort that participated in the postenrollment study (eg, optional components) differed significantly from that of the recruited population. The proportion of self-identified White participants increased by 21.2%, whereas the proportion of Black or African American participants decreased by 12.18% (P=.02). Participants who identified as White (n=93,614, 52.7%) and NonHispanic (n=109,279, 42.21%) were more engaged compared to those identifying as Black or African American (n=10,887, 15.76%), Asian (n=4274, 38.72%), or Hispanic (n=12,530, 20.7%; P=.006). Participants' response times to study surveys and completeness varied across all demographic groups (P<.001). Furthermore, those identifying as White skipped fewer survey questions (1.19) compared to those identifying as Black or African American (1.40) or other racial and ethnic identities (P<.001).

Conclusions: The AoURP dataset serves as an exceptional resource for investigating diverse public health concerns. However, the longitudinal analysis of participant-level data underscores a significant skew in population diversity, suggesting the need for targeted strategies to enhance engagement and retention across all groups. Ensuring diversity in the cohort is essential for maintaining the study's representativeness and the broad applicability of its findings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分散研究中不同研究群体的长期参与:“我们所有人”研究项目数据的纵向分析。
背景:临床研究的推广性取决于可靠的研究设计,其中包括招募和维持具有代表性的研究人群。本研究探讨了 329,038 名注册并参与 "我们所有人研究计划"(AoURP)的参与者的人口统计学特征的变化情况:本研究的主要目的是评估 AoURP 不同方案阶段参与者群体人口构成的变化,同时分析调查和次级研究的完成率和完成时限。此外,我们还研究了参与者与项目的互动如何影响参与度和调查回复:我们对 AoURP 数据进行了纵向分析,跟踪调查和次级研究的人口组成、完成率和完成时间的变化。我们进行了比较分析,以评估参与后研究内容的参与者的社会人口特征在参与度和调查完成度方面的差异:结果:参与注册后研究(如可选部分)的人群的社会人口组成与招募人群有显著差异。自我认同为白人的参与者比例增加了 21.2%,而黑人或非裔美国人参与者比例减少了 12.18%(P=.02)。与自称为黑人或非裔美国人(10887 人,15.76%)、亚裔(4274 人,38.72%)或西班牙裔(12530 人,20.7%;P=.006)的参与者相比,自称为白人(93614 人,52.7%)和非西班牙裔(109279 人,42.21%)的参与者参与度更高。在所有人口统计群体中,参与者对研究调查的回复时间和完整性各不相同(PConclusions:AoURP 数据集是调查各种公共卫生问题的绝佳资源。然而,对参与者层面数据的纵向分析强调了人口多样性的显著偏差,这表明有必要采取有针对性的策略来提高所有群体的参与度和保留率。要保持研究的代表性和研究结果的广泛适用性,就必须确保群组的多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信