HFNC Oxygen Therapy vs COT in Prolonged Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Inside the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ahmed M Mohamed, Wessam Z Selima
{"title":"HFNC Oxygen Therapy vs COT in Prolonged Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Inside the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study.","authors":"Ahmed M Mohamed, Wessam Z Selima","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and background: </strong>Hypoxemia is a common and serious complication occurring during deep sedation for prolonged upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE). We evaluated and compared the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy vs conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy (COT) in preventing hypoxemia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and who underwent prolonged (>15 minutes) UGE under deep sedation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Seventy patients aged 20-60 years with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) I, II, or III who were admitted to the ICU and were scheduled for an anticipated prolonged UGE were included. They were randomly assigned to be administered either oxygen through a standard nasal cannula (COT group) or oxygen through an HFNC (HFNC group). The primary outcome was any occurrence of at least moderate hypoxemic episodes [oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) < 90%] of any duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Regarding the occurrence of hypoxemic episodes, 18 patients (51.4%) in the COT group experienced hypoxemia with 11 (31.4%) experiencing mild hypoxemia, six (17.1%) experiencing moderate hypoxemia, and only one patient (2.9%) experienced severe hypoxemia, with a total of seven patients (20.0%) whose SpO<sub>2</sub> was <90%. Conversely, only two patients (5.7%) in the HFNC group had mild hypoxemia, and no patients had SpO<sub>2</sub> < 90%. Additionally, nine patients in the COT group experienced clinically significant hypoxemia, whereas no patients in the HFNC group (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy was safe, well tolerated, and significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxemic episodes, compared to COT, among high-risk ICU patients who underwent prolonged UGE under propofol deep sedation.(<b>Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID:</b> NCT06350864).</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Mohamed AM, Selima WZ. HFNC Oxygen Therapy vs COT in Prolonged Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Inside the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):223-229.</p>","PeriodicalId":47664,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"29 3","pages":"223-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims and background: Hypoxemia is a common and serious complication occurring during deep sedation for prolonged upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE). We evaluated and compared the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy vs conventional nasal cannula oxygen therapy (COT) in preventing hypoxemia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and who underwent prolonged (>15 minutes) UGE under deep sedation.

Materials and methods: Seventy patients aged 20-60 years with American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) I, II, or III who were admitted to the ICU and were scheduled for an anticipated prolonged UGE were included. They were randomly assigned to be administered either oxygen through a standard nasal cannula (COT group) or oxygen through an HFNC (HFNC group). The primary outcome was any occurrence of at least moderate hypoxemic episodes [oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 90%] of any duration.

Results: Regarding the occurrence of hypoxemic episodes, 18 patients (51.4%) in the COT group experienced hypoxemia with 11 (31.4%) experiencing mild hypoxemia, six (17.1%) experiencing moderate hypoxemia, and only one patient (2.9%) experienced severe hypoxemia, with a total of seven patients (20.0%) whose SpO2 was <90%. Conversely, only two patients (5.7%) in the HFNC group had mild hypoxemia, and no patients had SpO2 < 90%. Additionally, nine patients in the COT group experienced clinically significant hypoxemia, whereas no patients in the HFNC group (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy was safe, well tolerated, and significantly decreased the incidence of hypoxemic episodes, compared to COT, among high-risk ICU patients who underwent prolonged UGE under propofol deep sedation.(Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID: NCT06350864).

How to cite this article: Mohamed AM, Selima WZ. HFNC Oxygen Therapy vs COT in Prolonged Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Inside the ICU: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2025;29(3):223-229.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
299
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine (ISSN 0972-5229) is specialty periodical published under the auspices of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Journal encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the fields of critical and emergency medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信