Evaluation of a Fluorescence Immunoassay for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin Antigens.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Elizabeth M Garrett, Meng Pu, April M Bobenchik
{"title":"Evaluation of a Fluorescence Immunoassay for Detection of Clostridioides difficile Glutamate Dehydrogenase and Toxin Antigens.","authors":"Elizabeth M Garrett, Meng Pu, April M Bobenchik","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States, causing longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Accurate CDI diagnosis is essential for timely treatment and infection control. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI commonly involves the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and/or toxins A and B by immunoassays or the toxin genes by nucleic acid amplification. This study assesses the performance of a new commercial test, the Sofia® 2 C. difficile Fluorescent Immunoassay (Sofia 2; FIA; QuidelOrtho), for detecting C. difficile GDH and toxins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sofia 2 was compared to enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Techlab Inc.) and Immunocard (Meridian Bioscience) using remnant stool samples from 262 patients with suspected CDI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sofia 2 demonstrated high agreement with the EIA methods for GDH (positive percentage agreement (PPA): 100%, negative percentage agreement (NPA): 94%, overall percentage of agreement (OPA): 95%) and toxins (PPA: 100%, NPA: 99%, OPA: 99%) detection. Compared to standard-of-care (SOC) testing including toxin gene PCR with the following toxin antigen test, Sofia 2 demonstrates strong PPA (100%), NPA (98%), positive predictive value (71%), and negative predictive value (100%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sofia 2 C. difficile FIA generates rapid results that are comparable to other commercial immunoassays with a simple workflow, supporting its use for CDI diagnosis in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a leading cause of nosocomial infections in the United States, causing longer hospital stays, significant morbidity, and increased healthcare costs. Accurate CDI diagnosis is essential for timely treatment and infection control. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI commonly involves the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and/or toxins A and B by immunoassays or the toxin genes by nucleic acid amplification. This study assesses the performance of a new commercial test, the Sofia® 2 C. difficile Fluorescent Immunoassay (Sofia 2; FIA; QuidelOrtho), for detecting C. difficile GDH and toxins.

Methods: Sofia 2 was compared to enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) C. diff Quik Chek Complete (Techlab Inc.) and Immunocard (Meridian Bioscience) using remnant stool samples from 262 patients with suspected CDI.

Results: Sofia 2 demonstrated high agreement with the EIA methods for GDH (positive percentage agreement (PPA): 100%, negative percentage agreement (NPA): 94%, overall percentage of agreement (OPA): 95%) and toxins (PPA: 100%, NPA: 99%, OPA: 99%) detection. Compared to standard-of-care (SOC) testing including toxin gene PCR with the following toxin antigen test, Sofia 2 demonstrates strong PPA (100%), NPA (98%), positive predictive value (71%), and negative predictive value (100%).

Conclusions: Sofia 2 C. difficile FIA generates rapid results that are comparable to other commercial immunoassays with a simple workflow, supporting its use for CDI diagnosis in clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信