Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An In Vivo Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Vaibhavi Pharne, Sudha B Patil, Aruna P Vishwakarma, Prashant A Bondarde, Madhuri Bhandare, Rishabh Patel
{"title":"Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study.","authors":"Vaibhavi Pharne, Sudha B Patil, Aruna P Vishwakarma, Prashant A Bondarde, Madhuri Bhandare, Rishabh Patel","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Primary teeth often show bizarre root canal anatomy; this requires the clinician to gain a thorough knowledge of the primary root canal morphology. Complex primary root canal morphology often leads to missed canals, and hence, various strategies can be adapted to reduce this likelihood.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the detection rate and ease of locating root canal orifices in primary molars using magnifying loupes, methylene blue dye, and fluorescein sodium dye.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Parallel-arm randomized clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 36 primary molars were divided into two groups: Group I: methylene blue; Group II: fluorescein sodium. Both groups utilized magnifying loupes (×2.5). The principal investigator used magnifying loupes, followed by the coinvestigator who used the assigned dye to detect the canal orifices. The principal investigator again examined the dyed canal orifices under magnification. The number of canals found and the ease of locating them with the three different aids were recorded on a five-point Likert scoring scale by both investigators.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>A comparison of the number of canal orifices and ease of location was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference in ease of detection between loupes, methylene blue dye, and the loupes combination (<i>p</i>-value 0.047); also, between loupes, fluorescein sodium dye, and the loupes combination (<i>p</i>-value 0.040). However, no statistically significant difference was found in detection rate with the three different methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The dye and loupes combination was proven more effective than using dye or loupes alone.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Pharne V, Patil SB, Vishwakarma AP, <i>et al</i>. Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An <i>In Vivo</i> Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):64-69.</p>","PeriodicalId":36045,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","volume":"18 1","pages":"64-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11915412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Primary teeth often show bizarre root canal anatomy; this requires the clinician to gain a thorough knowledge of the primary root canal morphology. Complex primary root canal morphology often leads to missed canals, and hence, various strategies can be adapted to reduce this likelihood.

Aim: To compare the detection rate and ease of locating root canal orifices in primary molars using magnifying loupes, methylene blue dye, and fluorescein sodium dye.

Settings and design: Parallel-arm randomized clinical trial.

Materials and methods: A total of 36 primary molars were divided into two groups: Group I: methylene blue; Group II: fluorescein sodium. Both groups utilized magnifying loupes (×2.5). The principal investigator used magnifying loupes, followed by the coinvestigator who used the assigned dye to detect the canal orifices. The principal investigator again examined the dyed canal orifices under magnification. The number of canals found and the ease of locating them with the three different aids were recorded on a five-point Likert scoring scale by both investigators.

Statistical analysis: A comparison of the number of canal orifices and ease of location was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test.

Results: There was a significant difference in ease of detection between loupes, methylene blue dye, and the loupes combination (p-value 0.047); also, between loupes, fluorescein sodium dye, and the loupes combination (p-value 0.040). However, no statistically significant difference was found in detection rate with the three different methods.

Conclusion: The dye and loupes combination was proven more effective than using dye or loupes alone.

How to cite this article: Pharne V, Patil SB, Vishwakarma AP, et al. Comparison of Detection Rate and Ease of Locating Root Canal Orifices in Primary Molars Using Various Techniques, Namely Magnifying Loupes, Methylene Blue Dye, and Fluorescein Sodium Dye: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(1):64-69.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
135
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信