Psychological consistency network characteristics and influencing factors in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention treatment.

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Yue Li, Liang-Hong Wang, Huan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Yao-Qiong Lu, Tian-Ying Zhang, Hai-Bin Luo, Feng Tang
{"title":"Psychological consistency network characteristics and influencing factors in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention treatment.","authors":"Yue Li, Liang-Hong Wang, Huan Zeng, Yan Zhao, Yao-Qiong Lu, Tian-Ying Zhang, Hai-Bin Luo, Feng Tang","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.102571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A psychological sense of coherence (SOC) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients is important for disease prognosis, and there is considerable variation between their symptoms. In contrast, network analysis provides a new approach to gaining insight into the complex nature of symptoms and symptom clusters and identifying core symptoms.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore the psychological coherence of symptoms experienced by PCI patients, we aim to analyze differences in their associated factors and employ network analysis to characterize the symptom networks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 472 patients who underwent PCI were selected for a cross-sectional study. The objective was to investigate the association between general patient demographics, medical coping styles, perceived stress status, and symptoms of psychological coherence. Data analysis was conducted using a linear regression model and a network model to visualize psychological coherence and calculate a centrality index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Post-PCI patients exhibited low levels of psychological coherence, which correlated with factors such as education, income, age, place of residence, adherence to medical examinations, perceived stress, and medical coping style. Network analysis revealed that symptoms within the sense of psychological coherence were strongly interconnected, particularly with SOC2 and SOC8, demonstrating the strongest correlations. Among these, SOC10 emerged as the symptom with the highest intensity, centrality, and proximity, identifying it as the most central symptom.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The network model has strong explanatory power in describing the psychological consistency symptoms of patients after PCI, identifying the central SOC symptoms, among which SOC10 is the key to overall SOC enhancement, and there is a strong positive correlation between SOC2 and SOC8, emphasizing the need to consider the synergistic effect of symptoms in intervention measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"15 3","pages":"102571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11886314/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.102571","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A psychological sense of coherence (SOC) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients is important for disease prognosis, and there is considerable variation between their symptoms. In contrast, network analysis provides a new approach to gaining insight into the complex nature of symptoms and symptom clusters and identifying core symptoms.

Aim: To explore the psychological coherence of symptoms experienced by PCI patients, we aim to analyze differences in their associated factors and employ network analysis to characterize the symptom networks.

Methods: A total of 472 patients who underwent PCI were selected for a cross-sectional study. The objective was to investigate the association between general patient demographics, medical coping styles, perceived stress status, and symptoms of psychological coherence. Data analysis was conducted using a linear regression model and a network model to visualize psychological coherence and calculate a centrality index.

Results: Post-PCI patients exhibited low levels of psychological coherence, which correlated with factors such as education, income, age, place of residence, adherence to medical examinations, perceived stress, and medical coping style. Network analysis revealed that symptoms within the sense of psychological coherence were strongly interconnected, particularly with SOC2 and SOC8, demonstrating the strongest correlations. Among these, SOC10 emerged as the symptom with the highest intensity, centrality, and proximity, identifying it as the most central symptom.

Conclusion: The network model has strong explanatory power in describing the psychological consistency symptoms of patients after PCI, identifying the central SOC symptoms, among which SOC10 is the key to overall SOC enhancement, and there is a strong positive correlation between SOC2 and SOC8, emphasizing the need to consider the synergistic effect of symptoms in intervention measures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信