The influence and relationship of dysbiosis in the urinary microbiota on patients with urolithiasis.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Hsiang-Ying Lee, Chung Yu Lin, Yung-Shun Juan, Wen-Jeng Wu, Sung Yong Cho, Deng-Chyang Wu
{"title":"The influence and relationship of dysbiosis in the urinary microbiota on patients with urolithiasis.","authors":"Hsiang-Ying Lee, Chung Yu Lin, Yung-Shun Juan, Wen-Jeng Wu, Sung Yong Cho, Deng-Chyang Wu","doi":"10.1007/s00240-025-01724-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Urolithiasis is a disease with high prevalence and recurrence rate. There are various risk factors impacting on stone formation including intestinal micorbiota. This study aims to investigate the relationship between urine microbiota with urolithiasis. We collected mid-stream voided urine samples from urolithiasis patients and control participants and stored them in a freezer at - 80 °C. All enrolled participants were requested to provide information about their clinical characteristics. The procedure included the extraction of the genomic DNA from the urine samples; the amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR); PCR product quantification, mixing, and purification; DNA library preparation; and sequencing was performed with quality control (QC) measures. Alpha diversity was indicative of the species complexity within individual urine samples, and beta diversity analysis was used to evaluate the differences among the samples in terms of species complexity. We enrolled 28 urolithiasis patients and 59 control participants who reported no recent antibiotic usage. In the beta diversity analysis, there was a significant difference between the microbiota in the samples of the urolithiasis and control groups according to ANOSIM statistical analysis. (P = 0.004). On comparing the groups, it showed Alcaligenes, Bacteroides, Blautia, Ruminococcaceae_UCG, Cutibacterium, Alistipes, Lachnoclostridium present more significant in control group than urolithiasis patients. In conclusion, our current study shows that dysbiosis of urine microbiota may be related to the development of urolithiasis. Further research targeting specific microbes to identify their role in the development of diseases is necessary and might provide novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic options.</p>","PeriodicalId":23411,"journal":{"name":"Urolithiasis","volume":"53 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urolithiasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-025-01724-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urolithiasis is a disease with high prevalence and recurrence rate. There are various risk factors impacting on stone formation including intestinal micorbiota. This study aims to investigate the relationship between urine microbiota with urolithiasis. We collected mid-stream voided urine samples from urolithiasis patients and control participants and stored them in a freezer at - 80 °C. All enrolled participants were requested to provide information about their clinical characteristics. The procedure included the extraction of the genomic DNA from the urine samples; the amplification by polymerase chain reaction (PCR); PCR product quantification, mixing, and purification; DNA library preparation; and sequencing was performed with quality control (QC) measures. Alpha diversity was indicative of the species complexity within individual urine samples, and beta diversity analysis was used to evaluate the differences among the samples in terms of species complexity. We enrolled 28 urolithiasis patients and 59 control participants who reported no recent antibiotic usage. In the beta diversity analysis, there was a significant difference between the microbiota in the samples of the urolithiasis and control groups according to ANOSIM statistical analysis. (P = 0.004). On comparing the groups, it showed Alcaligenes, Bacteroides, Blautia, Ruminococcaceae_UCG, Cutibacterium, Alistipes, Lachnoclostridium present more significant in control group than urolithiasis patients. In conclusion, our current study shows that dysbiosis of urine microbiota may be related to the development of urolithiasis. Further research targeting specific microbes to identify their role in the development of diseases is necessary and might provide novel diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic options.

尿菌群失调对尿石症患者的影响及关系。
尿石症是一种高患病率、高复发率的疾病。影响结石形成的危险因素多种多样,包括肠道微生物群。本研究旨在探讨尿微生物群与尿石症的关系。我们收集了尿石症患者和对照组的中游空尿样本,并将其保存在- 80°C的冰箱中。所有入选的参与者都被要求提供有关其临床特征的信息。该程序包括从尿液样本中提取基因组DNA;聚合酶链反应(PCR)扩增;PCR产物的定量、混合和纯化;DNA文库制备;采用质量控制(QC)措施进行测序。Alpha多样性反映了单个尿样内物种复杂性,beta多样性分析用于评价不同尿样间物种复杂性的差异。我们招募了28名尿石症患者和59名未报告近期使用抗生素的对照组参与者。在beta多样性分析中,尿石症患者与对照组的微生物群差异有统计学意义。(p = 0.004)。组间比较结果显示,尿石症患者中Alcaligenes、Bacteroides、Blautia、Ruminococcaceae_UCG、Cutibacterium、Alistipes、Lachnoclostridium在对照组中较尿石症患者多。总之,我们目前的研究表明,尿菌群失调可能与尿石症的发生有关。有必要进一步研究特定微生物,以确定它们在疾病发展中的作用,并可能提供新的诊断生物标志物和治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urolithiasis
Urolithiasis UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the International Urolithiasis Society The journal aims to publish original articles in the fields of clinical and experimental investigation only within the sphere of urolithiasis and its related areas of research. The journal covers all aspects of urolithiasis research including the diagnosis, epidemiology, pathogenesis, genetics, clinical biochemistry, open and non-invasive surgical intervention, nephrological investigation, chemistry and prophylaxis of the disorder. The Editor welcomes contributions on topics of interest to urologists, nephrologists, radiologists, clinical biochemists, epidemiologists, nutritionists, basic scientists and nurses working in that field. Contributions may be submitted as full-length articles or as rapid communications in the form of Letters to the Editor. Articles should be original and should contain important new findings from carefully conducted studies designed to produce statistically significant data. Please note that we no longer publish articles classified as Case Reports. Editorials and review articles may be published by invitation from the Editorial Board. All submissions are peer-reviewed. Through an electronic system for the submission and review of manuscripts, the Editor and Associate Editors aim to make publication accessible as quickly as possible to a large number of readers throughout the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信