Reproducibility of Digital Measurements on Soft and Hard Tissue.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Philipp Thißen, Mariam Mehr, Thomas Eger, James Deschner, Andreas Magnus Geyer
{"title":"Reproducibility of Digital Measurements on Soft and Hard Tissue.","authors":"Philipp Thißen, Mariam Mehr, Thomas Eger, James Deschner, Andreas Magnus Geyer","doi":"10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this proof-of-principle study was to investigate the reproducibility of digital hard- and soft-tissue measurements obtained using an intraoral scanner.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two consecutive digital scans of the maxilla and mandible of 20 subjects aged 18-58 years were captured with an intraoral scanner. Afterwards, the double scans of each subject were virtually matched by three different methods using a dental software program. Linear distances between defined hard- and soft-tissue points on the intraoral scans were measured for each individual. To assess the reproducibility of the measurements for each matching method, the corresponding linear distances of the first and second scans were compared using a paired t-test (p 0.05). ANOVA (p 0.05) was used for comparison of the three matching methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both hard and soft tissue, the measured linear distances between the first and second scans did not differ statistically significantly. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the three matching methods for soft (p = 0.196) and hard (p = 0.963) tissue.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital measurements of hard and soft tissue are reproducible using intraoral scans. Furthermore, all three matching methods are suitable for the superimposition of scans. However, possible inaccuracies may depend on the experience of the practitioner, the technical limitations of the systems used, and patient-related factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19696,"journal":{"name":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","volume":"23 ","pages":"183-188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963731/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health & preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_1888","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this proof-of-principle study was to investigate the reproducibility of digital hard- and soft-tissue measurements obtained using an intraoral scanner.

Materials and methods: Two consecutive digital scans of the maxilla and mandible of 20 subjects aged 18-58 years were captured with an intraoral scanner. Afterwards, the double scans of each subject were virtually matched by three different methods using a dental software program. Linear distances between defined hard- and soft-tissue points on the intraoral scans were measured for each individual. To assess the reproducibility of the measurements for each matching method, the corresponding linear distances of the first and second scans were compared using a paired t-test (p 0.05). ANOVA (p 0.05) was used for comparison of the three matching methods.

Results: For both hard and soft tissue, the measured linear distances between the first and second scans did not differ statistically significantly. Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the three matching methods for soft (p = 0.196) and hard (p = 0.963) tissue.

Conclusion: Digital measurements of hard and soft tissue are reproducible using intraoral scans. Furthermore, all three matching methods are suitable for the superimposition of scans. However, possible inaccuracies may depend on the experience of the practitioner, the technical limitations of the systems used, and patient-related factors.

软硬组织数字测量的再现性。
目的:这项原理验证研究的目的是研究使用口内扫描仪获得的数字硬组织和软组织测量的可重复性。材料与方法:对20例年龄在18-58岁的患者,采用口腔内扫描器对其上、下颌骨进行连续两次数字扫描。之后,每个受试者的双重扫描通过三种不同的方法使用牙科软件程序进行虚拟匹配。测量每个人口腔内扫描中定义的软组织和硬组织点之间的线性距离。为了评估每种匹配方法测量的可重复性,使用配对t检验比较第一次和第二次扫描的相应线性距离(p 0.05)。三种匹配方法的比较采用方差分析(ANOVA) (p 0.05)。结果:对于硬组织和软组织,第一次和第二次扫描之间测量的线性距离没有统计学上的显著差异。软组织(p = 0.196)和硬组织(p = 0.963)三种匹配方法比较,差异无统计学意义。结论:口腔内扫描对软组织和硬组织的数字测量是可重复的。此外,这三种匹配方法都适合于扫描的叠加。然而,可能的不准确性可能取决于医生的经验、所使用系统的技术限制以及与患者相关的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral health & preventive dentistry
Oral health & preventive dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinicians, general practitioners, teachers, researchers, and public health administrators will find this journal an indispensable source of essential, timely information about scientific progress in the fields of oral health and the prevention of caries, periodontal diseases, oral mucosal diseases, and dental trauma. Central topics, including oral hygiene, oral epidemiology, oral health promotion, and public health issues, are covered in peer-reviewed articles such as clinical and basic science research reports; reviews; invited focus articles, commentaries, and guest editorials; and symposium, workshop, and conference proceedings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信