Moderators of aerobic exercise effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Parkinsonism & related disorders Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779
Ryul Kim, Nyeonju Kang, Joon Ho Lee, Hanall Lee, Tae Lee Lee, Do Kyung Ko, Hajun Lee, Kyeongho Byun, Kiwon Park, Jee-Young Lee, Beomseok Jeon
{"title":"Moderators of aerobic exercise effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ryul Kim, Nyeonju Kang, Joon Ho Lee, Hanall Lee, Tae Lee Lee, Do Kyung Ko, Hajun Lee, Kyeongho Byun, Kiwon Park, Jee-Young Lee, Beomseok Jeon","doi":"10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although growing evidence suggests that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), it remains unclear which specific aerobic exercise regimen optimizes improvement in these symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the effects of aerobic exercise on motor function in patients with PD according to exercise intervention protocols.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (<four vs. ≥four sessions per week), period (<12 weeks vs. ≥12 weeks), and intensity (low-to-moderate vs. moderate-to-high).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19970,"journal":{"name":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","volume":" ","pages":"107779"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parkinsonism & related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although growing evidence suggests that aerobic exercise has beneficial effects on motor symptoms in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), it remains unclear which specific aerobic exercise regimen optimizes improvement in these symptoms. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the effects of aerobic exercise on motor function in patients with PD according to exercise intervention protocols.

Methods: Through 28 qualified studies with randomized controlled trials, we assessed motor function using either the Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) III or Movement Disorder Society-UPDRS III as an outcome measure. We employed random effects meta-analysis models to obtain standardized mean differences and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Moderator variable analyses were conducted based on exercise type (aerobic exercise vs. aerobic-based combined exercise), duration (<60 min vs. ≥60 min per session), frequency (

Results: Aerobic exercise interventions demonstrated significant improvements in overall motor function. Although all categories were significantly effective in improving motor function, aerobic-based combined exercise had a greater effect size on motor symptoms compared to aerobic exercise alone. Additionally, ≥60 min per session showed a significantly increased effect size compared to <60 min per session. The impact of aerobic exercise did not differ based on exercise frequency, period, or intensity.

Conclusions: Our observations suggest that aerobic-based combined exercise and exercise sessions lasting 60 min or longer may be associated with greater improvements in motor symptoms in patients with PD.

有氧运动对帕金森病患者运动症状影响的调节因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析
虽然越来越多的证据表明有氧运动对帕金森病(PD)患者的运动症状有有益的影响,但目前尚不清楚哪种特定的有氧运动方案能优化改善这些症状。本研究旨在探讨不同运动干预方案下有氧运动对帕金森病患者运动功能影响的差异。方法:通过28项有资格的随机对照试验,我们使用统一PD评定量表(UPDRS) III或运动障碍协会-UPDRS III作为结果测量来评估运动功能。我们采用随机效应荟萃分析模型来获得标准化平均差异和95%置信区间(ci)。根据运动类型(有氧运动vs以有氧为基础的联合运动)、持续时间进行调节变量分析(结果:有氧运动干预显示整体运动功能有显著改善)。尽管所有类型的运动都能显著改善运动功能,但以有氧运动为基础的联合运动与单独有氧运动相比,对运动症状的影响更大。结论:我们的观察表明,有氧联合运动和持续60分钟或更长时间的运动可能与PD患者运动症状的更大改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Parkinsonism & related disorders
Parkinsonism & related disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.90%
发文量
292
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders publishes the results of basic and clinical research contributing to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of all neurodegenerative syndromes in which Parkinsonism, Essential Tremor or related movement disorders may be a feature. Regular features will include: Review Articles, Point of View articles, Full-length Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports and Letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信