Reliability of popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation in the seated position.

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Taskina Akhter, Patrick B Wilson, J David Branch, Leryn J Reynolds
{"title":"Reliability of popliteal artery flow-mediated dilation in the seated position.","authors":"Taskina Akhter, Patrick B Wilson, J David Branch, Leryn J Reynolds","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a noninvasive measure of endothelial function, is commonly measured in the popliteal artery in the supine and upright body positions. However, reliability studies of the measurement in these positions are not well studied. This study aimed to examine the trial-retrial and visit-to-visit reliability of popliteal artery FMD in the seated position. Popliteal artery FMD was measured in 20 healthy adults across two visits in the seated and prone positions to assess visit-to-visit reliability. Two measurements were taken for each body position at each visit to assess trial-retrial reliability. %FMD was calculated as the percent change from baseline diameter to peak diameter. The reliability of FMD was assessed via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Popliteal artery %FMD shows moderate-to-good reliability in the seated position (ICC: 0.67-0.89) and poor-to-moderate reliability in the prone position (ICC: 0.25-0.74) within and between visits. There were no significant differences in baseline diameter or minimum diameter between body positions, visits, or trials (p > 0.05). %FMD and peak diameter following cuff deflation demonstrated no significant difference between body positions (p > 0.05). Popliteal artery FMD demonstrates good reliability in the seated position, supporting the development of a standardized measurement protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 6","pages":"e70252"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923912/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a noninvasive measure of endothelial function, is commonly measured in the popliteal artery in the supine and upright body positions. However, reliability studies of the measurement in these positions are not well studied. This study aimed to examine the trial-retrial and visit-to-visit reliability of popliteal artery FMD in the seated position. Popliteal artery FMD was measured in 20 healthy adults across two visits in the seated and prone positions to assess visit-to-visit reliability. Two measurements were taken for each body position at each visit to assess trial-retrial reliability. %FMD was calculated as the percent change from baseline diameter to peak diameter. The reliability of FMD was assessed via the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Popliteal artery %FMD shows moderate-to-good reliability in the seated position (ICC: 0.67-0.89) and poor-to-moderate reliability in the prone position (ICC: 0.25-0.74) within and between visits. There were no significant differences in baseline diameter or minimum diameter between body positions, visits, or trials (p > 0.05). %FMD and peak diameter following cuff deflation demonstrated no significant difference between body positions (p > 0.05). Popliteal artery FMD demonstrates good reliability in the seated position, supporting the development of a standardized measurement protocol.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信