Effect of high-intensity laser therapy and photobiomodulation therapy on oral lichen planus-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Panpan Liu, Qi Zhou, Jie Bao, Muni Chen, Mengting Xu, Jiamin Bian, Yueqiang Wen, Jiayu Yan
{"title":"Effect of high-intensity laser therapy and photobiomodulation therapy on oral lichen planus-a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Panpan Liu, Qi Zhou, Jie Bao, Muni Chen, Mengting Xu, Jiamin Bian, Yueqiang Wen, Jiayu Yan","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04398-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Photobiomodulation (PBM) in treating Oral Lichen Planus (OLP), and explores optimal PBM parameter settings. A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and SinoMed was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on laser therapy for OLP up to October 30, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadad score. Eighteen studies were identified, with 16 involving 742 participants included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies compared PBM with topical corticosteroids (TCS), and five compared HILT with TCS. HILT provided superior pain relief compared to TCS (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.79,-0.23]), while PBM showed comparable outcomes (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.87, 0.04]). PBM was more effective at pain relief with total energy density below 120 J/cm<sup>2</sup>. Both HILT and PBM reduced recurrence rates (RR = 0.33,95%CI [0.15,0.73]; RR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.25, 0.74]) and improved cure rates (RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.01, 2.06]; RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.05, 2.05]). PBM had no adverse reactions, while HILT and TCS had associated adverse events. HILT and PBM may be considered effective alternatives to TCS. For PBM treatment of OLP, a total energy density below 120 J/cm<sup>2</sup> is advisable. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these findings and refine laser parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"151"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04398-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of High-Intensity Laser Therapy (HILT) and Photobiomodulation (PBM) in treating Oral Lichen Planus (OLP), and explores optimal PBM parameter settings. A search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and SinoMed was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on laser therapy for OLP up to October 30, 2024. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadad score. Eighteen studies were identified, with 16 involving 742 participants included in the meta-analysis. Eleven studies compared PBM with topical corticosteroids (TCS), and five compared HILT with TCS. HILT provided superior pain relief compared to TCS (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI [-0.79,-0.23]), while PBM showed comparable outcomes (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.87, 0.04]). PBM was more effective at pain relief with total energy density below 120 J/cm2. Both HILT and PBM reduced recurrence rates (RR = 0.33,95%CI [0.15,0.73]; RR = 0.43, 95% CI [0.25, 0.74]) and improved cure rates (RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.01, 2.06]; RR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.05, 2.05]). PBM had no adverse reactions, while HILT and TCS had associated adverse events. HILT and PBM may be considered effective alternatives to TCS. For PBM treatment of OLP, a total energy density below 120 J/cm2 is advisable. Further large-scale studies are required to confirm these findings and refine laser parameters.

高强度激光治疗与光生物调节治疗对口腔扁平苔藓的影响——系统回顾与荟萃分析。
本研究评估了高强度激光治疗(HILT)和光生物调节(PBM)治疗口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)的有效性和安全性,并探讨了PBM的最佳参数设置。检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、CNKI和sinmed,检索截至2024年10月30日激光治疗OLP的随机对照试验(rct)。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和Jadad评分评估研究质量。18项研究被纳入meta分析,其中16项涉及742名参与者。11项研究比较了PBM与局部皮质类固醇(TCS), 5项研究比较了HILT与TCS。与TCS相比,HILT提供了更好的疼痛缓解(SMD = -0.51, 95% CI[-0.79,-0.23]),而PBM显示了类似的结果(SMD = -0.41, 95% CI[-0.87, 0.04])。当总能量密度低于120 J/cm2时,PBM缓解疼痛的效果更好。HILT和PBM均可降低复发率(RR = 0.33,95%CI [0.15,0.73];RR = 0.43, 95% CI[0.25, 0.74])和提高治愈率(RR = 1.44, 95% CI [1.01, 2.06];Rr = 1.47, 95% ci[1.05, 2.05])。PBM无不良反应,而HILT和TCS有相关的不良事件。HILT和PBM可以被认为是TCS的有效替代方案。对于OLP的PBM处理,建议总能量密度低于120 J/cm2。需要进一步的大规模研究来证实这些发现并改进激光参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信