Mostafa Seif El Deen, Youssef Mohamed Hassan, Magdy Akel Sorour, Hany El Hadad, Mohamed Wael
{"title":"A Comparitive Study Between Early Outcomes of Laser and Lay-Open Technique in Management of Simple Pilonidal Sinus.","authors":"Mostafa Seif El Deen, Youssef Mohamed Hassan, Magdy Akel Sorour, Hany El Hadad, Mohamed Wael","doi":"10.1002/lsm.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pilonidal sinus (PS) predominantly impacts adolescent and young adult males. This condition may be asymptomatically or escalate to painful acute abscesses and recurrent discharge.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the early postoperative outcomes of laser therapy compared to the lay-open technique in the treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective randomized comparative study including 40 patients, divided into two equal groups: (a) The SiLaT group: PS treated with diode laser therapy (SiLaT) and (b) the lay-open group: PS treated with lay-open (sinotomy). Postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, pain scores, healing time, complications, and recurrence rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative time was significantly shorter in the SiLaT group (18.4 ± 2.1 min vs. 26.2 ± 3.7 min, p = 0.022). Hospital stay was shorter in the SiLaT group (6.60 ± 1.47 h vs. 15.10 ± 5.52 h, p < 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the SiLaT group (2.30 ± 0.92 vs. 4.80 ± 1.01, p < 0.001). Wound healing was significantly faster in the SiLaT group (10.1 ± 2.7 days vs. 34.1 ± 15.1 days, p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates (p = 0.998) and surgical site infection (p = 1.00) were comparable among both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) demonstrated superior early outcomes, including faster recovery, reduced pain, and fewer complications with earlier resumption of daily activities compared to the lay-open technique. However, recurrence rates remain similar, necessitating long-term studies to evaluate its effectiveness as a first-line treatment. These findings support the use of SiLaT as a day-case surgical procedure, for treating simple PS disease, particularly in young active patients seeking rapid recovery with minimal morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":17961,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Surgery and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pilonidal sinus (PS) predominantly impacts adolescent and young adult males. This condition may be asymptomatically or escalate to painful acute abscesses and recurrent discharge.
Objective: To evaluate the early postoperative outcomes of laser therapy compared to the lay-open technique in the treatment of chronic pilonidal sinus disease.
Methods: Prospective randomized comparative study including 40 patients, divided into two equal groups: (a) The SiLaT group: PS treated with diode laser therapy (SiLaT) and (b) the lay-open group: PS treated with lay-open (sinotomy). Postoperative outcomes such as operative time, hospital stay, pain scores, healing time, complications, and recurrence rates were analyzed.
Results: Operative time was significantly shorter in the SiLaT group (18.4 ± 2.1 min vs. 26.2 ± 3.7 min, p = 0.022). Hospital stay was shorter in the SiLaT group (6.60 ± 1.47 h vs. 15.10 ± 5.52 h, p < 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the SiLaT group (2.30 ± 0.92 vs. 4.80 ± 1.01, p < 0.001). Wound healing was significantly faster in the SiLaT group (10.1 ± 2.7 days vs. 34.1 ± 15.1 days, p < 0.0001). Recurrence rates (p = 0.998) and surgical site infection (p = 1.00) were comparable among both groups.
Conclusion: Sinus laser therapy (SiLaT) demonstrated superior early outcomes, including faster recovery, reduced pain, and fewer complications with earlier resumption of daily activities compared to the lay-open technique. However, recurrence rates remain similar, necessitating long-term studies to evaluate its effectiveness as a first-line treatment. These findings support the use of SiLaT as a day-case surgical procedure, for treating simple PS disease, particularly in young active patients seeking rapid recovery with minimal morbidity.
期刊介绍:
Lasers in Surgery and Medicine publishes the highest quality research and clinical manuscripts in areas relating to the use of lasers in medicine and biology. The journal publishes basic and clinical studies on the therapeutic and diagnostic use of lasers in all the surgical and medical specialties. Contributions regarding clinical trials, new therapeutic techniques or instrumentation, laser biophysics and bioengineering, photobiology and photochemistry, outcomes research, cost-effectiveness, and other aspects of biomedicine are welcome. Using a process of rigorous yet rapid review of submitted manuscripts, findings of high scientific and medical interest are published with a minimum delay.