Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction Model Using Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Related Findings: Impact of Combining Lesions' Locations and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values.
IF 1 4区 医学Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Hirotsugu Nakai, Hiroaki Takahashi, Jordan D LeGout, Akira Kawashima, Adam T Froemming, Jason R Klug, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Derek J Lomas, Mitchell R Humphreys, Chandler Dora, Naoki Takahashi
{"title":"Prostate Cancer Risk Prediction Model Using Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Related Findings: Impact of Combining Lesions' Locations and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values.","authors":"Hirotsugu Nakai, Hiroaki Takahashi, Jordan D LeGout, Akira Kawashima, Adam T Froemming, Jason R Klug, Panagiotis Korfiatis, Derek J Lomas, Mitchell R Humphreys, Chandler Dora, Naoki Takahashi","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of the study are to develop a prostate cancer risk prediction model that combines clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related findings and to assess the impact of adding Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions-level findings on its diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This 3-center retrospective study included prostate MRI examinations performed with clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) between 2018 and 2022. Pathological diagnosis within 1 year after the MRI was used to diagnose csPCa. Seven clinical, 3 patient-level MRI-related, and 4 lesion-level MRI-related findings were extracted. After feature selection, 2 logistic regression models with and without lesions-level findings were created using data from facility I and II (development cohort). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between the 2 models was compared in the PI-RADS ≥3 population in the development cohort and Facility III (validation cohort) using the Delong test. Interfacility differences of the selected predictive variables were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test or chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Selected lesion-level features included the peripheral zone involvement and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The model with lesions-level findings had significantly higher AUC than the model without in 655 examinations in the development cohort (0.81 vs 0.79, respectively, P = 0.005), but not in 553 examinations in the validation cohort (0.77 vs 0.76, respectively). Large interfacility differences were seen in the ADC distribution ( P < 0.001) and csPCa proportion in PI-RADS 3-5 ( P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adding lesions-level findings improved the csPCa discrimination in the development but not the validation cohort. Interfacility differences impeded model generalization, including the distribution of reported ADC values and PI-RADS score-level csPCa proportion.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":"49 2","pages":"247-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The aims of the study are to develop a prostate cancer risk prediction model that combines clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-related findings and to assess the impact of adding Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) ≥3 lesions-level findings on its diagnostic performance.
Methods: This 3-center retrospective study included prostate MRI examinations performed with clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) between 2018 and 2022. Pathological diagnosis within 1 year after the MRI was used to diagnose csPCa. Seven clinical, 3 patient-level MRI-related, and 4 lesion-level MRI-related findings were extracted. After feature selection, 2 logistic regression models with and without lesions-level findings were created using data from facility I and II (development cohort). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) between the 2 models was compared in the PI-RADS ≥3 population in the development cohort and Facility III (validation cohort) using the Delong test. Interfacility differences of the selected predictive variables were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test or chi-squared test.
Results: Selected lesion-level features included the peripheral zone involvement and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The model with lesions-level findings had significantly higher AUC than the model without in 655 examinations in the development cohort (0.81 vs 0.79, respectively, P = 0.005), but not in 553 examinations in the validation cohort (0.77 vs 0.76, respectively). Large interfacility differences were seen in the ADC distribution ( P < 0.001) and csPCa proportion in PI-RADS 3-5 ( P < 0.001).
Conclusions: Adding lesions-level findings improved the csPCa discrimination in the development but not the validation cohort. Interfacility differences impeded model generalization, including the distribution of reported ADC values and PI-RADS score-level csPCa proportion.
目的:本研究的目的是建立一种结合临床和磁共振成像(MRI)相关发现的前列腺癌风险预测模型,并评估增加前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)≥3个病变级别发现对其诊断性能的影响。方法:本研究为三中心回顾性研究,纳入2018年至2022年间临床疑似临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的前列腺MRI检查。MRI诊断csPCa后1年内病理诊断。我们提取了7个临床、3个患者和4个病变的mri相关发现。特征选择后,使用设施I和II(发展队列)的数据创建2个具有和不具有病变水平发现的逻辑回归模型。采用Delong检验比较两种模型在开发队列和设施III(验证队列)PI-RADS≥3人群中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验或卡方检验评估所选预测变量的设施间差异。结果:选择的病变水平特征包括周围区受累和表观扩散系数(ADC)值。在发展队列中,有病变水平发现的模型的AUC显著高于没有检查的模型(分别为0.81 vs 0.79, P = 0.005),但在验证队列中,有553次检查的模型的AUC不显著(分别为0.77 vs 0.76)。在ADC分布中发现了较大的设施间差异(P)。结论:在发展中增加病变水平的发现改善了csPCa的歧视,但在验证队列中没有改善。设施间的差异阻碍了模型的推广,包括报告的ADC值和PI-RADS评分水平csPCa比例的分布。
期刊介绍:
The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).