Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial doppler biomarkers for the prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Hanna Schenck, Céline van Craenenbroeck, Sander van Kuijk, Erik Gommer, Michael Veldeman, Yasin Temel, Marcel Aries, Werner Mess, Roel Haeren
{"title":"Systematic review and meta-analysis of transcranial doppler biomarkers for the prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia following subarachnoid hemorrhage.","authors":"Hanna Schenck, Céline van Craenenbroeck, Sander van Kuijk, Erik Gommer, Michael Veldeman, Yasin Temel, Marcel Aries, Werner Mess, Roel Haeren","doi":"10.1177/0271678X251313746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) significantly impacts mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of Transcranial Doppler (TCD)-derived biomarkers for predicting DCI via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Included studies had to correctly define DCI and report data on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Univariate or bivariate analyses with a random effects model were used, and risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. From 23 eligible articles (n = 2371 patients), three biomarker categories were identified: cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV), cerebral autoregulation, and microembolic signals (MES). The highest sensitivity (0.86, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) and specificity (0.75, 95% CI 0.52-0.94) for DCI prediction were achieved with a mean CBFV of 120 cm/s combined with a Lindegaard ratio. The transient hyperemic response test showed the best performance among autoregulatory biomarkers with a sensitivity of 0.88, (95% CI 0.54-0.98) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.52-0.94). MES were less effective predictors. Combining CBFV with autoregulatory biomarkers enhanced TCD's predictive value. High heterogeneity and risk of bias were noted, indicating the need for a standardized TCD approach for improved DCI evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"1031-1047"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X251313746","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following an aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) significantly impacts mortality, morbidity, and healthcare costs. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of Transcranial Doppler (TCD)-derived biomarkers for predicting DCI via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Included studies had to correctly define DCI and report data on sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. Univariate or bivariate analyses with a random effects model were used, and risk of bias was evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. From 23 eligible articles (n = 2371 patients), three biomarker categories were identified: cerebral blood flow velocities (CBFV), cerebral autoregulation, and microembolic signals (MES). The highest sensitivity (0.86, 95% CI 0.71-0.94) and specificity (0.75, 95% CI 0.52-0.94) for DCI prediction were achieved with a mean CBFV of 120 cm/s combined with a Lindegaard ratio. The transient hyperemic response test showed the best performance among autoregulatory biomarkers with a sensitivity of 0.88, (95% CI 0.54-0.98) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.52-0.94). MES were less effective predictors. Combining CBFV with autoregulatory biomarkers enhanced TCD's predictive value. High heterogeneity and risk of bias were noted, indicating the need for a standardized TCD approach for improved DCI evaluation.

经颅多普勒生物标志物预测蛛网膜下腔出血后迟发性脑缺血的系统回顾和meta分析。
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)后的延迟性脑缺血(DCI)显著影响死亡率、发病率和医疗费用。本研究通过系统回顾和荟萃分析评估了经颅多普勒(TCD)衍生生物标志物预测DCI的诊断准确性。纳入的研究必须正确定义DCI,并报告敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值的数据。采用随机效应模型进行单因素或双因素分析,并通过诊断准确性研究质量评估评估偏倚风险。从23篇符合条件的文章(n = 2371例患者)中,确定了三种生物标志物类别:脑血流速度(CBFV)、脑自动调节和微栓塞信号(MES)。结合Lindegaard比值,平均CBFV为120 cm/s时,DCI预测的灵敏度(0.86,95% CI 0.71-0.94)和特异性(0.75,95% CI 0.52-0.94)最高。瞬时充血反应试验在自调节性生物标志物中表现最好,敏感性为0.88 (95% CI 0.54-0.98),特异性为0.82 (95% CI 0.52-0.94)。MES的预测效果较差。CBFV与自调节生物标志物结合可提高TCD的预测价值。注意到高异质性和偏倚风险,表明需要标准化的TCD方法来改进DCI评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信